According to utilitarianism, punishing or treating the criminal offender benefits society and this benefits outweighs the negative effects on the individual offender. This is a teleological argument because the morality of the punishment is determined by the consequences derived reduced crime (Pollock 327). According to Bentham, he believed that punishment works when it is applied rationally to rational people but is not acceptable when the person did not make a rational decision to commit the crime, such as when the law forbidding the action was passed after the action occurred, the law was unknown, the person was acting under compulsion, or the person was an infant, insane or intoxicated (Pollock 327).
According to utilitarianism, punishing or treating the criminal offender benefits society and this benefits outweighs the negative effects on the individual offender. This is a teleological argument because the morality of the punishment is determined by the consequences derived reduced crime (Pollock 327). According to Bentham, he believed that punishment works when it is applied rationally to rational people but is not acceptable when the person did not make a rational decision to commit the crime, such as when the law forbidding the action was passed after the action occurred, the law was unknown, the person was acting under compulsion, or the person was an infant, insane or intoxicated (Pollock 327).