Preview

Capitalism in Marx and Weber

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capitalism in Marx and Weber
The Concept Of Capitalism In Marx And Weber; What Is The Contemporary Relevance Of Their Ideas?

Introduction:
At the later nineteenth century many social and economical ideas were developed because of the past revolutions and the present conflict of individuals and organised assemblies. Capitalism, one of these ideas, leads bourgeoisie to dream of a capitalist society in order to advance their maintain lifestyle and gain wealth. This economic system which is dominated by private business and the principles of production are for profit works in side of the bourgeoisies. The employees, working to these businesses, carry out the production but don’t own it. They produce «commodities» as they are called by Marx, which belong to the employer in return for wage. Many thinkers of 19th and 20th century analysed Capitalism each in his own way. Karl Heinrich Marx (1818-1883) and Maximilian Carl Emil Weber (1864–1920) are two of the most important figures in the science of sociology who still inspire contemporary society with their ideas.

Despite their indisputable differences, Marx and Weber have much in common in their evaluation of modern capitalism: they share a vision of the capitalist economic system as a universe where “individuals are directed by abstractions,” (Marx), where impersonal relations and objects replace personal relations of dependence, and where the accumulation of capital becomes an end in itself and irrational. And whereas Marx is making anti-capitalism critique banks on the possibility of overthrowing capitalism by workers of socialist persuasion, Weber is a fatalistic and resigned observer to the mode of production and administration that seem to him to be inevitable. The purpose of this paper is to compare both Marx’s and Weber’s ideas and theories about Capitalism and then to evaluate their relevance in contemporary society.

Marx’s and Weber’s Ideas about Capitalism:
Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) was the forefather to the great communist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    How and why does Weber seek to establish a connection between the Protestant ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism?…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx: the German philosopher with his works the communist manifesto and capital, provide a bitter critique of capitalism.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Max Weber's The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is a study of the relationship between the ethics of ascetic Protestantism and the emergence of the spirit of modern capitalism. Weber argues that the religious ideas of groups such as the Calvinists played a role in creating the capitalistic spirit. Weber first observes a correlation between being Protestant and being involved in business, and declares his intent to explore religion as a potential cause of the modern economic conditions. He argues that the modern spirit of capitalism sees profit as an end in itself, and pursuing profit as virtuous. Weber's goal is to understand the source of this spirit. He turns to Protestantism for a potential explanation. Protestantism offers a concept of the worldly "calling," and gives worldly activity a religious character. While important, this alone cannot explain the need to pursue profit. One branch of Protestantism, Calvinism, does provide this explanation. Calvinists believe in predestination--that God has already determined who is saved and damned. As Calvinism developed, a deep psychological need for clues about whether one was actually saved arose, and Calvinists looked to their success in worldly activity for those clues. Thus, they came to value profit and material success as signs of God's favor. Other religious groups, such as the Pietists, Methodists, and the Baptist sects had similar attitudes to a lesser degree. Weber argues that this new attitude broke down the traditional economic system, paving the way for modern capitalism. However, once capitalism emerged, the Protestant values were no longer necessary, and their ethic took on a life of its own. We are now locked into the spirit of capitalism because it is so useful for modern economic activity.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is a dynamic system. If there is one thing that characterizes this system above all others, it is the ubiquity of change. From Marx, to Weber, to Schumpeter, analysts of capitalism have emphasized its dynamic qualities. Several sources of this dynamism have been proposed. For Marx it was the conflict between classes, for Weber it was the continuing development of rationalization and for Schumpeter, it was innovation, both technological and organizational.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is a compilation of thoughts regarding German economic and political concerns. Karl Marx conceives capitalist society’s responsible for the estrangement of the laborer. The capitalist mode of production ensures that man’s labor necessarily restricts him from acting in accordance with his humanity. The theory of capitalism diverts him, in the sense that it provides false hope for betterment, while the structure of capitalism, in coercing him to fluctuate his priorities away from that of an autonomous social being towards that of a collective individual, debases man’s special bond to his species- what is self-contradictory is it asks him to abandon his deepest bond to humanity, while at the same time offering him the hope of becoming a better social being. As a result of this contradiction, Marx affirm, man’s labor alienates him from himself and from his species. Yet I am here to argue, although man may feel alienated from himself and product of work, man has the choice, option to free himself from notions of capital enslavement. Within this essay, I will define estrangement of labor and the four main dimensions of alienation, evident in a capitalist society. I will discuss how alienated labor comes about as a result of capitalism and why said labor is not socially commend. Furthermore, I will elucidate on what non-alienated labor would be like, compared to alienated labor, in a capitalist society. Ultimately, I will annotate why Marx’s critique of capitalism is unfound and how labor under capitalism is in fact, engaging.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels stood firm in their belief that the main theme of industrial capitalism was freedom. They wanted the proletarians to have the freedom to become a complete human being by recreating oneself through free choices. They accredited a high importance to the human persona and thought that making a life was separate from producing an item for another person. Marx and Engels express their concerns for the human under capitalism through Communist Manifesto. Capitalism forces individual self-advance but only in preventive and misleading ways because almost everything the bourgeois society creates will only exist to be torn down. For Marx and Engels, capitalism is approaching a massive climax where those who are being crushed by it are overcoming the people who benefit from it. Marx recognizes, however, that the working class has no way of seizing property since none of them own anything themselves, consequently they will have to tear down and destroy all private ownership which will result in class itself disappearing. In such a notion that capitalism is seen as a "runaway train," Marx and Engels dispute the next stages in this historical dialectic is for the proletarians to own the ways of production, an arrangement where there will be a transposition of society so that those who are lacking power will now have it once they distinguish their…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capitalism is defined as “an economic system in which the ownership of the means of production- like land, factories, large sums of money, and machines - is in private hands” (SOC 10). Social Philosopher Karl Marx strongly believed that in the end, capitalism simply wouldn’t work for several different reasons. His idea became known as Marxian conflict theory. While the functionalist theory examines groups’ order and cohesion, the conflict theory examines ways groups disagree and struggle for power. Marx predicted that capitalism would cause continuous tension between the haves and the have -not’s; the have-not’s mostly being the minorities and the poor. He believed that capitalist societies would be reduced to two social classes; the capitalist class (the bourgeoisie or the rich) and the working class (the proletariat or the poor), and that this division would eventually cause some sort of social upheaval.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weber V. Diamond

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Weber’s argument is that capitalism flourished when the protestant (particularly Calvinism) ethic encouraged large numbers of people to engage and work in the secular world, developing their enterprises and using their wealth to invest back into their business. He defines spirit of capitalism as the ideas and habits that favor the rational pursuit of economic gain. Capitalism was not the goal for the protestant reformation but yet an unplanned byproduct. On the other hand, Diamond is trying to explain why the west dominated over other cultures by means of superior guns, population destroying germs, steel, and food producing capability. Agriculture and record keeping lead to the development of technology, science, and advanced government which gave the west its economic development over other parts of the world.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weber argued that capitalism was closely linked this to the protestant work ethic (Calvinism). He said that Calvinism formed capitalism over a period of time. The strong work ethic lead to an accumulation of wealth due to the lack of spending Calvinists performed. It was seen that greed/spending money was a challenge to God and as the Calvinists wanted Gods ‘approval’ they did not spend. Calvinists believe in predestination which means you are chosen to go to or not to go to heaven, before you were born. There was no way to prove if you were or not, only that the people who where predestined to go to heaven had a strong, hard work ethic. This high accumulation of wealth led to the Calvinists investing their money back into their businesses instead of spending it. This led to and formed capitalism. However, Capitalism existed before Calvinists in some areas, which goes against Weber ’s theory that Calvinists work ethic formed Capitalism. Also, Scotland developed capitalism much later then many other countries despite being strongly Calvinist.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx explores on capitalism and its effects on society. Capitalism is referred to as an economic and political system where the country’s market industry is ‘capitalized’ and owned by private individuals. These individuals are known as the bourgeoise. The bourgeoisie are the people who own the means of production. Moreover, beneath these individuals are the means to their product known as the proletariat. The proletariats are individuals known as the ‘working class’ and sell their labour to the bourgeoisie for wages. Evidently, the bourgeoisie-protelteriat relationship is an interdependent system that is the core of capitalism.(quote 3) The underlying forces of capitalism are class conflicts and exploitation. (quote 3).…

    • 1683 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    shovan

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    SOCIOLOGY (HONS./PG) [ CODE -31]] The five broad areas are: Sociological Thought, Sociological Theory, General Sociology, Research Methods and Indian Society Sociological Thought Comte : Positivism, Sob cila Statics & Social Dynamics, Hierarchy of Sciences, Law of Three Stages. Spencer : Organicism, Social Evolution, Typology of Societies. Durkheim : Methodology, Division of Labour, Suicide, Religion, Social Fact. Weber : Methodology, Social Action, Authority, Rationality, Protestant ethic and capitalism Marx : Methodology, Class, Class struggle & Revolution, Alienation, Stages of Social Development, State.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays