John D. Rockefeller formed the Standard Oil Company in 1870. One of the first things that he had to deal with was the high cost of transporting the barrels of oil to his refineries in Cleveland, Ohio. He negotiated a deal with a railroad company that lowered his shipping costs. This allowed him to lower the cost of his oil which resulted in more sales (www.spartacus.schoolnet.com). By doing this Rockefeller could undersell his competitors.
Rockefeller wanted to expand his business even more. He figured that if he could buy out his competitor's companies then he could create a giant oil company and lower his prices even more. His method is called horizontal consolidation, which involves the bringing together of many firms in the same business. The law stated that one company could not own the stock of another. Rockefeller got around this by creating a trust. Eventually forty companies joined the Standard Oil trust (Cayton 238). In my opinion that was a smart move, not an immoral one.
Not only was Rockefeller a savvy businessman, but he was also a philanthropist. By the end of his life he had given over $500 million to establish or improve charities. His donations also played a large part in establishing the University of Chicago. He founded the Rockefeller Foundation which gave aid to institutions working in the fields of public health, fine arts, and social research (Cayton 238). He set up the Rockefeller Institute for medical research and also founded the Rockefeller General Education Board which helped to establish many high schools (http://voteview.uh.edu/entrejdr.htm).
Andrew Carnegie came from humble beginnings in Scotland. The development of the Bessemer process convinced him that steel would soon replace iron. He established the Carnegie Steel Company in 1889. The business prospered and soon became extremely lucrative. He had enough money to buy the companies that performed all the phases of steel production, such as the mines, furnaces, and railroads. This process is called vertical consolidation. Owning all of the phases of production allowed him to drastically cut his prices. His competitors didn't have enough wealth to purchase the phases of production so they couldn't afford to lower their prices. This caused Carnegie to sell more and some of his competitors to go out of business (Cayton 238).
Carnegie believed in a "gospel of wealth". He thought that people should be permitted to make as much money as they can, but after they make it they should give it away. More than eighty percent of Carnegie's fortune went toward some type of education. He donated money for more than 3,000 free public libraries, supported artistic and research organizations, and set up a fund to study how to eliminate war. By the time of his death Carnegie had given away over $350 million (Cayton 238).
Carnegie and Rockefeller are just two examples of people who were sometimes perceived as captains of industry. Some people saw their trusts, monopolies, and labor conditions as immoral and unethical. I see them as clever. They found the loopholes in the system and used them to their advantage. Businesspeople today would do the same thing. No one doubted what their motives were. They wanted to make money, and make as much of it as possible. However, they also used their wealth to benefit the nation. They donated money to innumerable charities and organizations. That in my opinion, makes them captains of industry.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In the nineteenth century, there were two industrialists and one of them was the Captain of Industry. But, we’re going to focus on the Robber Baron, they’re known more for their dirty work. Some examples are bad political practices, business reforms, and treated their workers poorly in terms of labor. Many people don’t know what these industrialist did to the public to gain their wealth, but now you’ll know the bitter truth.…
- 412 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
John D. Rockefeller has earned a spot in the hall of shame. He became wealthy because of ruthless and dishonorable business tactics which then hurt the nation. Rockefeller became wealthy because, he lowered his prices way down and forced the Pennsylvania Railroad to lower their prices, and he also ran smaller companies out of business and then took them over for his own. After he took over most of the smaller businesses, he raised his own prices back up in order to bring in a bigger profit. Rockefeller’s robber baron side was reflected by this action because, he went behind people’s backs and turned the other way when it came to business partners.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Morgan,Rockefeller and Carnegie were robber barons They were considered cruel and ruthless. Carnegie made his employees work long hours and gave them little pay he even tried to stop unions in his company. Employees pointed out that Rockefeller could have paid his workers a fairer wage and settled for being a half billionaire. Morgan criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his.…
- 70 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Rockefeller was a Captain of Industry through his legal means of business. Rockefeller bought out companies through agreements. Rockefeller bought out companies through legal means which lead him to be able to get a monopoly. This evidence shows Rockefeller is a Captain of Industry…
- 278 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Carnegie did believe in survival of the fittest and that the rich was more competent and educated than the poor, middle class but, he also believed in aiding the less fortunate in a non-direct way by “ ...bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer,...”(Doc 4). In controlling multiple industries he provided the less fortunate with jobs and work experience, bettering them in a non-direct way. John D. Rockefeller on the other hand believed in boosting himself using horizontal integration, monopolizing the smaller businesses, expanding his industry further and further. Rockefeller once had monopolized almost 90% of the oil and oil refining businesses. He lowered his prices to attract a customer base slowly eliminating all of his competitors by either buying them out or forcing them out of business, to then jack up his prices once he owned most of the industry. Because of his monopoly in the oil industry he and the railroad tycoon Vanderbilt were in league together giving “discriminating rates” to outside , small business competitors (Doc 7). In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to…
- 972 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
According to some business historians, "business leaders were not predatory money seekers. Indeed, in many cases they were talented individuals whose creative contributions to the economy - and to American society as a whole - were very great." Allan Nelvins said that "it was true that Rockefeller used methods that were of dubious moral character. On the other hand the kind of monopoly control attained by Standard Oil was a natural response to the anarchical cutthroat competition of the period and reflected the trend in all industrial nations toward consolidation. To Nelvins Rockefeller was not a robber baron; he was a great innovator who imposed upon American industry 'a more rational and efficient pattern.' Rockefeller's objective was not merely the accumulation of wealth; he and others like him were motivated by 'competitive achievement, self-expression, and the imposition of their wills on a given environment'" (The American Businessman: Industrial Innovator or Robber Baron, pg. 34). These men came into a disorganized economy and created organizations that played a vital role in making American the greatest industrial power in the world. If it were not for the advancements in steel, oil, textiles, chemicals, electricity, and automotive vehicles, our nation would not be where it stands…
- 1559 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
of the time were John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan. The definition of a…
- 600 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Today, we know that John D Rockefeller the founder of Standard Oil company used his power to eliminate his competitors and tried to create a monopoly in oil industry. He made secret rebates with railroad companies, so railroads gave his company a lower rate than his competitors. As a result, he could drive out them from the market. In order to destroy the competitors, he raised prices in the areas with no competition, and lower prices in the areas with competition. His strategies ruined competitors, and made them to sell out or go bankrupt. He was considered a ruthless or tyrant who had a lot of enemies, but it was not considered illegal or unethical to monopolize an industry. I think after his first priority which was making money, he was…
- 233 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In 1870, Rockefeller and a few associates incorporated the Standard Oil Company in Ohio. Because of Rockefeller's know how on economical operations, Standard Oil Company…
- 2897 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
In document 7 it states that “In 1882 the Carnegie Steel Company...inaugurated a policy whose object was to control all factors which contributed to the production of steel, from the ore and coal in the ground to the steel billet and the steel rail.” Andrew Carnegie’s company basically owned iron mines, steel mills, railroads, and shipping lines. Rockefeller used his profits to buy other oil companies and ended rivalry in the oil industry by forming the Standard Oil Trust. J.P. Morgan created a banking monopoly, Swift and Armour possessed meat packing, and Vanderbilt created a railroad…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
With this borrowed money and the money he had made with his other business, he bought the largest oil refinery in Cleveland, Ohio and started Standard Oil. Rockefeller formed Standard Oil with his younger brother William Rockefeller, Henry Flagler, and a group of other men. John was the company’s president and the largest shareholder. Over the next few years, Rockefeller made new partners and grew his business interest in the growing oil industry. In 1882 these companies combined to form the Standard Oil Trust. This trust would soon control about 90% of the nation’s refineries and pipelines in America. One of the reasons Standard Oil was so successful was that they bought rival companies and started companies for distributing and marketing their products. “In order to exploit economies of scale, Standard Oil did everything from building it’s own barrels to employing scientists to figure out a use for petroleum by products.” Because of Rockefeller’s enormous wealth and fame, he was often the target of people spreading rumours about how he ran his business and how he became successful. As the New York Times reported in 1937: “ He was accused of crushing out competition, getting rich on rebates from railroads, bribing men to spy on competing companies, making secret agreements, coercing rivals to join the Standard Oil Trust under threat of being forced out of business, building up enormous fortunes on the ruins of other men, and so…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Business is a fascinating topic to research and no one is more fascinating that John D. Rockefeller. This paper answers the age old question of any successful businessman: where did he get his start? I will answer that question with a paper about John D. Rockefeller’s early life. It will also explain how he became one of the first great business leaders for America and some of the major influences in his life and what he did after he…
- 765 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
John D. Rockefeller created an oil empire, the Standard Oil Company, in this manner. Rockefeller monopolized the oil market through horizontal consolidation, buying out competitors, or driving competitors out of business by initiating rate wars. His cold-hearted mentality was highlighted when he claimed, “Individualism has gone, never to return.” In his testimony to the United States Industrial Commission, Rockefeller boasted about the “power to give the public improved products at less prices and still make a profit for stockholders”, but failed to recognize that consolidation left the poorer class suddenly unemployed. Many magnates also followed Andrew Carnegie’s entrepreneurial tactic of vertical consolidation, in which every stage of manufacturing a product was in the hands of a single corporation. According to James B. Weaver, such schemes allowed trusts to “control the articles which the plain people consume in their daily life.” The American people were forced to cope with the sugar trust, the leather trust, the harvester trust, the tobacco trust, and Rockefeller’s dominant Standard Oil trust. Along with the development of trusts, the invention of machinery allowed rich industrialists to hire less workers for lower wages. By cutting employees and saving money, the corrupt barons were…
- 881 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
* Sherman Antitrust Act- a law, enacted in 1890, that was intended to prevent the creation of monopolies by making it illegal to establish trusts that interfered with free trade.…
- 343 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Industrial revolution provided an opportunity for a handful of Americans to amass a great deal of wealth and prosper. The conditions that allowed for the rise of these Americans were cheap labor, a lack of government regulations, and improved technology in manufacturing and communications. Some Americans were convinced that these industrialists were crooks, stealing from the public to build their fortunes. By increasing goods, creating jobs and expanding markets, others would argue they were captains of industry and served their nation in a positive way. As pioneers of the modern industry, having ultimately acted in the best interests of society in America, I believe in the end, they were more characteristic of captains of industry for…
- 418 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays