Preview

Case Study: Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Davis V. the Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County
Assignment #1

Case Study: Davis v. The Board of County Commissioners of Doña Ana County

Joseph Boltersdorf

Dr. Patricia Drain

Business Employment Law

January 24, 2011

1. What was the legal issue in this case? In the opinion of Judge Richard C. Bosson, the legal issue in this case was to, “…decide whether an employer owes prospective employers and foreseeable third persons a duty of reasonable care not to misrepresent material facts in the course of making an employment recommendation about a former employee (in this case, Joseph “Tinie” Herrera), when a substantial risk of physical harm to third persons (in this case, Mariah C. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant) by the employee is foreseeable” (Walsh, 2010). Former supervisors at the Doña Ana County Detention Center (Frank Steele, Director and Al Mochen, Captain & Assistant Director), gave positive endorsements of Herrera to the Mesilla Valley Hospital (MVH) who hired him as a mental health technician after he resigned from the Detention Center. The Plaintiff alleged that MVH’s decision to hire Herrera was based on misinformation provided by Steele and Mochen.
2. Why does the court conclude that Doña Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation)? According to Mann (2000), “The Court of Appeals held that when the county law enforcement officers (Steele and Mochen) undertook to provide an employment reference, they owed a duty not to make negligent misrepresentations to the subsequent employer, and that this duty extended to the patient, if a substantial risk of physical harm to a third person was foreseeable (p. 2). The Court of Appeals made it very clear that although a former employer is not required to provide an employment reference (they can remain silent), but if she or he chooses to provide one, they have a duty to provide the facts about that person. Since Steele provided a signed written statement, not only omitting references about Herrera’s



References: Maguire, M. Esq. (2011, January 24). Truth and consequences: navigating the minefield of references for dangerous former employees. Retrieved from http://www.diogenesllc.com/referencesarticle.pdf Mann, L. (2000). Employees’ rights to privacy. Modrall Sperling. Retrieved from http://library.findlaw.com/2000/Feb/1/132915.html VersusLaw, Inc. (2008). Court documents. Retrieved from http://nm.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer .aspx/xq/fac.19990713_42131. NM.htm/qx Walsh, D. J. (2010). Employment law for human resource practice: 2010 custom edition (3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    References: Walsh, D. J. (2010). Employment law for human resource practice: 2010 custom edition (3rd…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Walsh, D. J. (2010). Employment Law for Human Resource Practice: 2010 custom edition (3rd Ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Why does the court conclude that Dona Ana County could be held liable for negligent referral (misrepresentation)?…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi (Khajavi), an anesthesiologist, and defendant, Robert Del Pero, a surgeon, engaged in an altercation over the wisdom of proceeding with a particular surgery, defendant Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group (Feather River) terminated Khajavi’s employment. At trial, the court non-suited Khajavi’s claims that defendants Feather River and Robert Del Pero had discharged him, and conspired to discharge him, in violation of public policy -- that is, in retaliation for advocating “medically appropriate health care” in violation of Business and Professions Code section 2056.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cited: Chrisman, R (2011). Presentation: Understanding Agency and Employment Relationships [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from Liberty University Blackboard.Gaines-Tabb v. ICI Explosives, USA, INC. - November 9, 1998. (n.d.). Leagle Home. Retrieved from http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?page=3&xmldoc=1998773160F3d613_1669.xml&docbase=CSLWAR2-1986-2006&SizeDisp=7Gumprecht, M. E. (2008, March 12). Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, Civil Action No. 82A04-8876-CV-285. Retrieved February 2, 2013, from http://www.gumpville.com/school/law/2008-03%20-%20Summary%20Judgment%20Motion%20(Pro%20Plaintiff).pdfHoly Bible: The new King James version, containing the Old and New Testaments. (1982). Nashville, TN: T. Nelson.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yunker V. Honeywell

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. The court meant by its statement that negligent hiring and negligent retention “rely on liability on the part of an individual or a business that has been on the basis of negligence or other factors resulting in harm or damage to another individual or their property” (Luthra, 2011) and not on “an obligation that arises from the relationship of one party with another” (Luthra, 2011). The court meant that “negligent hiring and negligent retention do not rely on the scope of employment but address risks created by exposing members of the public to a potentially dangerous individual” (McAdams, 2007, pg. 457).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case that I examined was found directly from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) website. It examines the Aurora Health Care facility, with locations in Wisconsin and Northern Illinois. The Minneapolis, WI location was sued by two individuals whom were wrongfully subjected to a full health examination prior to an official extension of an offer for employment. The company also decided against hiring both individuals based upon the health assessment. Many things went wrong with this case in particular. First, the health facility had no rights to subject the potential candidates for a full health screening, without proposing any official offer for employment. They actually did just the opposite, and mandated to the individuals that if they were seeking to gain employment, the facility would need the health assessment prior to any full job offer. Secondly, per the documentation, one of the individuals disclosed his carpal tunnel syndrome throughout the interview process, yet did not mark it as a health condition. In his defense, he had surgery to correct the carpal tunnel syndrome, but the health facility went out of their way to wrongfully access his health records disclosing the man’s previous condition. Nonetheless, the syndrome would not have affected the candidate’s work ethic or work load. The second individual in this case had a similar play of events as well. She was wrongfully not offered a position due to the fact of her not disclosing a medication that she had previsouly taken. The woman had MS and at one point in her life was taking a narcotic medication that is prescribed to individuals to take during hours of sleep. She did not disclose the medication because it was not prescribed to her or in consumption for quite some time. The facility again, wrongfully accessed her previous medical records that documented the drug, and…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On November 28, 2008 our office received a phone call from a distraught woman, her name was Karla Girroir. She stated her husband was in a severe car accident while driving their antique mobile home back to their house on Thanksgiving’s Eve. I listened carefully, documenting her every word as she sobbed out the facts regarding her husband’s condition. I offered to schedule an appointment as quickly as possible with Janice Fisher, our attorney. She advised me she was unable to come in because her husband had fallen into a coma and she needed to be by his side. I stayed late waiting for Janice to finish up with her other clients. I couldn’t get Mr. Girroir’s case off of my mind and I had to speak to her before I could go home. I discussed the case with Janice and she immediately called Mrs. Girroir, I acted as a translator between Janice and Mrs. Girroir as she spoke very little English and fluent Spanish. We were advised that Mrs. Girroir had no way of transportation for herself or her twin daughters to come into the office. So Janice offered to meet her at the hospital.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cost Club One

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Bennett-Alexander, D. D., & Hartman, L. P. (2007). Employment Law for Business (5th ed.). : The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shoe Store Incident

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Upon Imelda arriving at the shoe store, Imedla clearly has voiced her opinion that she wants a female associate to assist her with her purchases. Bob explained to Imedla that the associate available for assistance today is Tom. Imedla has indicated she would purchase additional shoes if a female associate helped her. Bob regrettably informs Imelda that the company has a strict policy that designates the associates must alternate positions and today is Tom’s day for customer service. Unfortunately, Bob realizes the store may lose additional purchases because of the decision to have Tom assist Imelda. However, Bob strongly believes the company policy is a purposeful guideline to follow, and he should not waver from this policy.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr Mccall Paper

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Read the case study in Ch. 4 of Medical Law and Ethics that begins, “Jerry McCall is Dr. William’s office assistant.”…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    People all make mistakes. But in relationships that have not been allowed to deepen and mature, trust is easily undermined. If trust is developed through an individual’s observed behavior, disruptive actions may have little impact. Had Walker worked for the firm for a number of years and showed a high level of integrity, this lapse in judgment may have been overlooked. In this situation, the fact that Walker had just been hired may have dictated no other course of action than her dismissal.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lemon Tree Dilemma

    • 269 Words
    • 1 Page

    To begin with, an infringement of the harassment policy under Title VII was violated by the heads of two distinct research departments. Firstly, it has been noted that the manager, Paul Peel, had harassed the employee, Peter Dragon, regarding the issue of drug use. During my investigation, I had come to realize that Mr. Peter Dragon did have past occurrences of drug use that your company had discovered via drug testing. However, I have also took into consideration that he had passed the majority of the drug tests and the ones in which he failed on were due to traces of various chemicals that Mr. Dragon was exposed to during his daily work tasks. Moreover, I have also considered the fact that your company had financially sponsored Mr. Dragon to spend time in a drug rehabilitation center to cure him of his drug addiction. Furthermore, the doctor in charge of Mr. Dragon at the rehabilitation center had advised that he had been fully cured from his addiction. After having this formal evidence of Mr. Dragon’s cure, Mr. Paul Peel continued to falsely…

    • 269 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dillon V. Champion Jogbra

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What is the legal issue in this case? Linda Dillon appealed her case against her employer, Champion Jogbra, on the grounds of wrongful termination. The company’s progressive policy for disciplinary action was not applied. Therefore, Dillon makes her claim that her at will status was modified according to the employee handbook and practices. Employee’s handbook should be written clearly and reviewed by legal experts (Walsh, 2010). Champion Jogbra countered that Dillon was an at-will employee and she could be terminated at any time. Dillon also, argues against that the summary of promissory estoppels is incorrect. Champion pointed out that the policies and procedures contained in the manual are for guideline purposes only, not contractual. The policies and procedures are not any part of a contract or a commitment to employees. The courts decided the disclaimer in the handbook could create an implied contract to the employees, even though the disclaimer statements states otherwise. The disciplinary system as outline in the employee handbook was inconsistent with the at-will language relationship, disclaimer statement and the companies progressive discipline policies. Handbooks when originally devised the method to counter labor union efforts, they have “become much more legally binding” as courts have found parts to be, in effect, promises or contracts. As stated by, Allen Weitzman, with Proskauer Rose Law Firm in Florida, “That’s why every word counts,” (SHRM). When issuing employee handbooks employers should ensure every word that is in the handbook count and they are not conflicting in nature.…

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    kedlac case study

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Silence is not always golden. In this case it is truly represented due to the lack of information provided by a prior employer. “Dr. Robert Lee Berry was a practicing anesthesiologist and shareholder in Lakeview Anesthesia Associates, L.L.C.” (https://www.quimbee.com/cases/kadlec-medical-center-v-lakeview-anesthesia-associates) “In March 2001, Berry failed to respond to several pages while on a 24-hour shift at LRMC and was found sleeping in a chair and “appeared to be sedated.” (https://www.quimbee.com/cases/kadlec-medical-center-v-lakeview-anesthesia-associates) There were also some concerns expressed by nursing staff about how Dr. Berry was taking Demerol and not signing off for the medication. What we are coming to understand is Dr. Berry has a truly severe disease known as addiction. The information provided and witnessed by the employers and employees is what helped determine Dr. Berry’s termination.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays