Preview

Case Study: Did Win Breach His Fiduciary Duty To Hailey

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Did Win Breach His Fiduciary Duty To Hailey
Did Win breach his fiduciary duty to Hailey?

Fiduciary Duty
Cal Family Code § 721
A husband and wife owe to each other a duty of highest good faith and fair dealing, and neither shall take any unfair advantage of the other. The duty is including but not limited to, providing each spouse access to records regarding transactions and accounting information, concerning the community property.

Cal Family Code § 1100 (e)
Each spouse has an obligation with respect to the management and control of the community property. Each spouse must make full disclosure to the other spouse of all material facts and information regarding the existence, characterization, and valuation of all assets in which the community may have an interest and debts for which the community may be liable, upon request.

Cal Family Code § 1101
A spouse has a claim against the other spouse for any breach of the fiduciary duty that results in impairment to the claimant spouse’s present undivided one-half interest in the community estate by causing a detrimental impact on it.
…show more content…
Hailey would argue that Win breached his fiduciary duty owed to her by making such a highly speculative investment decision in spite of her warning as she thought “it was a terrible idea”, and as the result, losing all the money as it was “wiped out.” Hailey would also argue that the investment was speculative because it was a software “startup” company, and that Win took unfair advantage of Hailey because he went ahead and blew all the money on the speculative investment although she “begged” him not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Whenever a devise, conveyance, assignment, or other transfer of property, including a beneficial interest in a land trust, maintained or intended for maintenance as a homestead by both husband and wife together during coverture shall be made and the instrument of devise, conveyance, assignment, or transfer expressly declares that the devise or conveyance is made to tenants by the entirety, or if the beneficial interest in a land trust is to be held as tenants by the entirety, the estate created shall be deemed to be in tenancy by the entirety.” (765 ILCS 1005/1c).…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Client Gia Smith is a 42 years old female black African America born in New York City, United States. Client does not have a GED or High School Diploma. Client became pregnant at the age of 17 years old and client was obligated to drop out of High School. Client is eligible for Food Stamps and Cash Assistance. Client last employment was in 2001 as a cash register at a clothing store named Sterns. HS has observed client dresses appropriately at all times, is well groomed, has good hygiene and has adequate eye contact.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Because you 're filing a joint return, Lance and Wanda both need to sign the tax return.…

    • 2752 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ?Buder?s ex-wife, Sartore, sued him, alleging that he had breached his fiduciary duty owed to the children under the UGMA. She sought to recover the funds lost by Buder?s investment of the children?s funds in penny stocks. Who wins?? (Gift)…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Page V. Gulf Coast Motors

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Glenn A. Page was friend for a long time of Jerry Sellers, an owner of Gulf Coast Motors. Glenn began borrowing money from Gulf Coast Motors on a regular basis for two years. There was no formal loan process. Glenn would sign a ledger where it was written “I agree to pay Jerry Sellers as above”. Glenn made some small payments towards his account attempting to reduce or pay the balance. At the time the money was borrowed Glenn was not working so he had not assets in his own name. Gathered evidence showed that Glenn had a gambling issue. Sellers testified that at the end of the two year period, Mary R. Page, Glenn’s wife orally guaranteed to repay Glenn’s loans. Mary on the contrary had significant assets of her own. Mary denied that she had promised to pay Glenn’s debt. Gulf Coast Motors sued Glenn and his wife Mary to recover payment for the unpaid loans. (Cheeseman, H. Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues (7th ed). Pearson Learning Solutions)…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Bezirdjian v. O’Reilly, the plaintiff (Bezirdjian) files a shareholder derivative complaint on behalf of Chevron Corporation citing that current and certain former member of Board of Directors (BOD) breached fiduciary duties, grossly managed the corporation, were involved in constructive fraud, and wasted corporate assets “in connection with illicit payments Chevron allegedly made to Saddam Hussein in exchange for Iraqi oil from 2000 to 2003.” Bezirdjian has a legal right to bring an action against the alleged party because he believes that harm has been done to Chevron in connection to illicit payments made to Saddam Hussein but the corporation itself has not taken any action against the offenders.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will make use of case law, statutes and legal writings to establish discussions that will determine the rightful interest-holder of the property above. In assessing whether Pamela has a priority over the two mortgagees, it is appropriate to first establish whether she has an interest over the property. Acquisition of interest in land exists in various forms. They include purchase of the land, inheritance, interest through a trust and adverse possession.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion Nichols, was in violation of Garelli Wong’s claim because of the disclosure agreement he had signed while under their employ. Contracts are binding and that is the smoking gun, and that being the case Nichols was in direct violation of that contract, for this reason alone the courts should have found in favor of Garelli Wong, Inc.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 2 Geology

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Steven, who is Bertha 's guardian, convinces her to buy a certain parcel of land from Christy at a greatly inflated price. Steven may be liable for…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Life estate Pur Autre Vie should be given to Lucy, based on her life and Barry’s life with the remainder being divided between his heirs in a fee simple absolute. This would allow both he and Lucy to live there for the duration of their lives, yet the property interest is in Lucy’s name. The heirs will have the remainder interest as…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Affirmative actions plans are used to benefit society, it is a management tool designed to ensure equal employment opportunity. It includes the policies, practices and procedures the University implements to address underutilization in its workforce and to ensure that all qualified applicants and employees receive an equal opportunity for recruitment, retention, selection, advancement, training, development and every other condition and privilege of employment. Affirmative action goes beyond non-discrimination. Whereas equal opportunity is passive, affirmative action is positive, constructive action. The general premise underlying affirmative action is that absent discrimination, over time an employer's workforce, generally, will reflect the gender, racial, and national origin/ethnicity profile of the labor pools from which the employer recruits and hires its employees. Affirmative action attempts to compensate for past discriminatory practices by requiring federal contractors to engage in "good faith efforts" to expand outreach and recruitment of women, minorities, persons with disabilities and certain protected veterans, thereby making them aware of employment opportunities and providing access to be able to pursue such opportunities. I believe that this would be illegal as the university has a right to actively seek to recruit minorities to the school but it cannot discriminate against the non-minority students who would be discriminated by eliminating the remaining spots if the quota of 20 was not fulfilled. some employers voluntarily adopt affirmative action policies and will make an extra effort to hire a diverse workforce. Once a company adopts an affirmative action policy, they should follow it to avoid lawsuits from potential employees. There was a case in July 2013 which was called Fisher v Texas. In 2008, several high school seniors who had been denied admission at the University of Texas-Austin filed a lawsuit. The…

    • 2357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. What objective evidence was there to support the defendants’ contention that they were just kidding when they agreed to sell the farm?…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synopsis of Rule of Law. The California court found that partners in nonmarital relationships may bring claims for property division based on both express and implied contracts.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the employees, Dale Garman, found out that Wilson was falsifying his monthly housing expenses and was in fact living in his old neighborhood, which couldn't possibly cost more than $300. The house that Wilson was living in was not up to the company standards and it looked as if he was sharing it with quite a few people. Dale notified Wilson's supervisor Barbara Weston of his living situation and Barbara confronted Wilson. Wilson admitted to the falsified invoices and pleaded to Barbara that there is quite a bit expected of him as a Rambian from the slums. He provides for his family and pays for his nieces' and nephews' educational expenses from that money. He also felt that if he lived in an expensive area like his colleagues, his family would judge his actions and think of him as selfish. Although Wilson had good intentions in falsifying his claims, he did not use the allowance as NewComm intended for him to do and more importantly falsified his invoices. Now Barbara faces a tough decision of deciding how to appropriately handle this situation in an ethical way.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays