Preview

Case Study: Dunn V. Mcwilliams

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1094 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Dunn V. Mcwilliams
McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States
Introduction
The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.
…show more content…
This was requested in relation to the Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S 68 ruling of 1985 that had approved that the defendant is allowed to have a meaningful expert assistance in the “evaluation, preparation, and presentation of the defense” . However in the case argument it was realized that this clause did not clearly describe if the expert should be independent of the prosecution. The prosecution in this case was not willing to submit to this request claiming that the defendant needed only access to an expert. The prosecution was against the idea of the defendant being offered an independent expert but they wanted the judge to allow provision of an expert who would be neutral to all parties involved in the …show more content…
The Supreme Court felt that the lower courts were holding on errors and were wide diverging from the establishment of the law. However there was an opinion that the courts error was not substantial and injurious to warrant a grant of habeas relief. The court observed that the court was wring on holding to the idea that the Ake law requirements was satisfactorily met by providing the defendant with a competent psychiatrist . The Supreme Court reported that the Ake law does not only provide for examination but it should also allow for “access to a competent psychiatrist who will conduct an appropriate examination and assist in evaluation preparation, and presentation of the defense

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    (Cheeseman2013) In the case of Cunningham v. Hastings, Mr. Hastings and Mrs. Cunningham, was an unmarried couple, purchased a home together. Mr. Hastings put $45,000 down payment toward the home out of his pocket. When it came to how the deed established the deed stated Hastings Cunningham as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. The couple occupied the property jointly. When the relationship between the two ended, Mr. Hastings seized sole possession of the property. Mrs. Cunningham filed a complaint seeking partition of the real estate. Based on its determination that the property could not be split, the trial court ordered it to be sold. The trial court further ordered that $45,000 of the sale proceeds be paid to Mr. Hastings to reimburse…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dethorne Graham, who is a diabetic, asked a friend, William Berry, to drive him to a store to purchase some juice to neutralize the start of an insulin reaction. When Dethorne Graham entered the store, he saw the number of people that would be ahead of him, Dethorne Graham hurried out and asked William Berry to drive him to a friend's house instead. Connor, a Charlotte, North Carolina police officer, became wary after seeing Dethorne Graham quickly enter and leave the store. Officer Connor followed William Berry's car, about half a mile from the store, he made an investigative stop and ordered Dethorne Graham And William Berry to wait while he found out what had happened in the store.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles Baker sued Joe Carr because he explained that the legislature of Tennessee failed to represent urban citizens and overrepresented rural citizens. A law in Tennessee required every district to be redrawn every ten years, but Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901. Baker stated that Urban areas had grown in population and should be represented as equal as rural areas. He also said that urban areas failed to receive “equal protection of the laws” , required by the Fourteenth Amendment.…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world is full of camera phones, different social media outlets, and the work of law enforcement is not hidden anymore, the general public can see the police officers performing their jobs. However, those officers quick to use gun or Taser lack the skills in de-escalation when dealing with a minor hostile situation. Nevertheless, the case of Bryan v. McPherson was related to a situation of officer Brian McPherson and motorist Carl Bryan, which Mr. Bryan was pulled over and issued a citation early that same day and headed to southern California from Camarillo to Coronado.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smith V. Sate Case Study

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Answer: The hearsay rule prohibits statements made outside of court to be offered as proof, in admitting evidence. However there are exceptions to the hearsay rule, which includes statements made in 1) excitement utterance, this is defined as statements made while the declarant was under stress of excitement which caused it. 2) Present impression, statements made during or right after the declarant perceived it. 3) There are various records rules; such as public records which are marriage, death, and birth if reported to legal office, observations made while on public duty like how many times an officer has had disciplinary actions against him or her while on duty. Cases filed in courts prior…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963 Clarence Earl Gideon presented himself in front of the Supreme Court. Gideon had been indicted for breaking and entering; after defending himself in his preliminary trial he was sentenced to five years in prison. During his time in jail, Gideon did some research on law and wrote an appeal to the Supreme Court. Gideon’s request of representation was on behalf of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court decided to put the case on trial; it related back to the Betts v. Brady case of 1942. Unlike Betts v. Brady’s 6-3 ruling in which Betts had lost, Gideon won the case with an astounding 9-0 majority. The main issue of the case centers on proper representation of the defendant. In order for the reader to fully understand the scope of the case, he or she needs to consider Betts v. Brady.…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones V. Tsige Case Study

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort system provides compensation to individuals who have been wronged or injured by the activity of another individual. Until the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v. Tsige in 2012, resulting in the creation of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, the common law did not include torts that did not entail a personal or financial injury. It is essential the common law includes torts that do not entail actual injury to provide individuals the means of seeking remedies when they are wronged from the wrongdoer responsible for the action.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King V Burwell Case Study

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court decision in King v. Burwell surrounded the challenge of provision to the Affordable Care Act. The key question the case focused on was whether Obamacare authorized federal tax subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance through a state exchange. The challenger, King, argued the way the law was written can’t allow for states to subsidized insurance through a federal-run exchange. They argued that insurance subsides are only allowed in states that operate their own insurance exchange. Pointing to a clause “established by the state,” the plaintiff argued the way the law, written by members of Congress, authorizes only to tax and subsides in states that established…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many ways, the opinion in this case represents a final step in the creation of…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doe V. Delie Case Study

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The minimum health care standards are intended to insure that the quality of health care services provided to inmate’s correctional facilities is maintained at a level consistent with legal requirements, accepted professional standards and sound professional judgment and practice. Such as: medical and dental diagnosis, treatment and appropriate follow up during “sick call” care consistent with professional standards and sound professional judgment and professional practice; administration of emergency medical and dental care; assessment of the quality of health service delivery on an ongoing basis. No inmate may be punished for requesting medical care or for refusing it.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Missouri in 1975. This case is brought to the Supreme Court for review in 1969 where Drope, the Petitioner, and his acquaintances are charged with assisting in a rape and kidnapping of his wife. Once indicted the petitioner files a motion in order to obtain psychiatric evaluation and further treatment; this request is quickly denied. Once on to trial, Drope does not try to deny the claim against him however; his wife attests to acts of strange behavior, anti-social behavior, and recalls an incidence in which he tried to murder her the Sunday before the trial begins. Two days into the trial Drope shoots himself and is hospitalized unable to return, the court decides to continue on the basis that his absence was on this own accord. The case was closed with a jury finding him guilty and sentenced to life in prison. Once sentenced he immediately filed an injunction asking for another trial do to the fact he was deprived of his constitutional rights after not being given a mental competency hearing prior to or during trial. This case is seen by the same judge that has just sat through the previous trial. This motion is discarded upholding the ruling of the previous court, which this verdict is held up in the Missouri Supreme Court as well. Once heard by the Supreme Court they find that there should have been a mental competency hearing ordered prior to trial due to overwhelming evidence of mental instabilities. His suicide attempt should have also caused for a hold on the trial in order for mental competency to be reviewed at that point. Petitioner’s attorney asks for a recess at the time of the shooting and is denied. The court is ordered to proceed without him there; the Supreme Court finds this to be another oppression of his constitutional rights. This is a very good example of the mental competency evaluation and the importance that it plays for patients. Some patients should be in mental rehabilitation’s but are…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Appendix D CJS/240

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Briefly review the discussions in the other two topics you did not choose for your first response on conversation starter 1. In a 200- to 300-word response, address the main points for and against the two controversial issues.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hurst Error Analysis

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Despite the fact that this Court has found the Hurst error harmless in some cases without evidentiary development, this Court has never done so when a defendant has proffered evidence and been denied a hearing. Appellant requested a hearing based on a substantial evidentiary proffer showing the extent of the Hurst error in his case. This proffer cast doubt on what the outcome of his penalty phase would have been without the constitutional error. In light of Appellant’s proffer, the circuit court should have held an evidentiary hearing on harmless error. This Court should remand for such a hearing.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Lasnik Case

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The public defense systems of two towns near Seattle, Washington were found to be so in adequate that they violate the sixth amendment right to the assistance of counsel in criminal prosecutions. U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik condemned the cities of Mount Vernon and Burlington, Washington for failing to provide meaningful representation to indigent defendants facing misdemeanor charges. A class-action suit against the cities, brought by the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington affiliate and private citizens went to trial in June.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The right to counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. It provides for counsel in phases of a criminal proceeding for anyone who cannot afford one. This wasn’t always the case. Early colonial days did not allow defendants the opportunity to hire their own attorney nor was one appointed. This right has been earned in incremental stages involving several precedent cases. Those cases include Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 321 (1972), and United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967). Today, counsel is guaranteed in all phases of critical pretrial events. Counsel is also guaranteed during post-trial sentencing procedures and in a first appeal to a conviction ensuring the presence, expert advice, and assistance at all stages of a prosecution (Kanovitz, 2010, p. 409).…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays