Preview

Right to Counsel

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1808 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Right to Counsel
THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL

The right to counsel is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. It provides for counsel in phases of a criminal proceeding for anyone who cannot afford one. This wasn’t always the case. Early colonial days did not allow defendants the opportunity to hire their own attorney nor was one appointed. This right has been earned in incremental stages involving several precedent cases. Those cases include Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938), Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 321 (1972), and United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 (1967). Today, counsel is guaranteed in all phases of critical pretrial events. Counsel is also guaranteed during post-trial sentencing procedures and in a first appeal to a conviction ensuring the presence, expert advice, and assistance at all stages of a prosecution (Kanovitz, 2010, p. 409).
In the early founding of this country, the colonies used common law brought over from England which prevented serious offenders from obtaining counsel even at their own expense (Right to Counsel Clause). Some attorneys, out of the kindness of their heart and others for self-serving purposes, would lend their services freely and other times the public would pay. This pattern continued until the Revolutionary war at which time the practice of hiring one’s own representation was well practiced. The right of counsel was secured in the Sixth Amendment.
The Sixth Amendment gave the right to counsel but only people who could afford an attorney could hire one. Thus, a large population of people was left to defend themselves at a great disadvantage for many of them were uneducated or had other issues that prevented them from getting a fair trial. The first major incremental case to impact the right to counsel was Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). In Powell, the court recognized that poor and illiterates were not receiving a



References: Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972). Kanovitz, J.R. (2010). Constitutional law (12thed.). New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963). Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938). Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932). Right to Counsel Clause(2010). Revolutionary War and Beyond. Accessed on 21 February 2012 at http://www.revolutionary-war-and-beyond.com/right-to- counsel-clause.html United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    McWilliams V Dunn Supreme Court of the United States Introduction The Dunn v. McWilliams case is a famous court case that was heard before the supreme court of United States in April 24, 2017. The case involved James McWilliams as the petitioner against Jefferson Dunn was the commissioner and was representing the Alabama department of corrections. The focus of the case was the sixth amendment of the US constitution was useful in providing for the right to the assistance of an attorney to represent them in defense. However the oral arguments in the case pointed out that it was unclear on whether the defendant’s right to an attorney allows for him to an independent expert who would be devoted in advocating specifically for the defense’s case.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama, and overruled Betts v. Brady, which allowed selective application of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states, itself previously binding only in federal cases. Instead, the court held that the right to the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right, essential for a fair trial, thereby emphasizing the procedural safeguards which were needed for due process of law. In this sense, the court ruled specifically that no one, regardless of wealth, education or class, should be charged with a crime and then be forced to face his accusers in court without the guidance of counsel. All of the other justices concurred in the judgment.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Court held that the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of counsel is a fundamental right essential to a fair trial and, as such, applies the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In overturning Betts, Justice Black stated that “reason and reflection require us to recognize that in our adversary system of criminal justice, any person brought into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, can’t be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.” He further wrote that the “noble ideal” of “fair trials before impartial tribunals in which ever defendant stands equal before the law, can’t be realized if the poor man charged with crime has to face his accusers without a lawyer to assist him.”…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal system of the United States has been overwhelmed by underfunding and excessive caseloads, which has placed a substantial burden on public defenders. Unfortunately, public defenders are the hardest working attorneys and sector of the legal system because they are severely understaffed. Therefore, they are represented by public defenders, which is a granted constitutional right in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright. This case specified that states are required to provide defense attorneys to defendants convicted of a felony or serious crime that cannot provide attorney representation for themselves. According to Brunt (2015), “approximately 80% of the offenders that are charged with a felony are indigent.” This is a relatively large number…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prepare a 1,050- to 1,400- word paper in which you analyze the aspect(s) of right to council. Examine the development of right to council and when the right to council attaches to criminal procedure, as well as the right to self-representation. Additionally, be sure to define the role of attorneys in the criminal justice system as it applies to right to council.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the colonies in America were established, most of the American law remained rooted in English law and continued the practice of denying counsel to defendants, although the laws varied depending on the colony. Close to the end of the Revolutionary war in America, the right to represent and the right to counsel was widely regarded as a…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1791, the United States Constitution implemented the Bill of Rights to protect the rights of the individuals by listing specific prohibitions of governmental power. The Bill of Rights consisted of the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, including the Sixth Amendment—the right to counsel. The Betts v. Brady case, Gideon v. Wainwright case, and Shelton v. Alabama case, each demonstrated how individuals wrongfully suffered due to the lack of appointed counsels. Following these three significant court cases over the past 80 years, the Supreme Court set a precedent for all cases to follow, by ensuring the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right which has led to a more just system—one which acknowledges equal rights of all individuals,…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zero Tolerance Case Study

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Judge Civarelli denied juveniles their constitutional right of the 6th amendment: right to counsel. He claims that only once did he deny the right to counsel to a juvenile and the rest, if requested, could have asked for counsel and they would have placed the case in a continuance. As we see in the…

    • 1984 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    CJ 305

    • 1602 Words
    • 9 Pages

    -Ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceedings which could jail or imprison the defendant; warren court’s judicial activism in criminal rights.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Powell v AL

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DISSCUSSION: Justice Sutherland delivered the opinion of the court. They said “a defendant should be afforded a fair opportunity to secure counsel of his own choice.” The court also determined that the defendants were not “defendants were not accorded the right of counsel in any substantial sense”. When the court appointed the members of the bar from the area he knowingly denied the defendants their right to counsel. Paired with the poor indefinite charge to get the defendants counsel with their…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bill of Rights also protected the right to trial by jury in civil cases. This guarantees the right to trial by jury in civil cases in federal courts in the seventh amendment. This amendment was added by one of our Founding Father James Madison. This amendment makes sure that your case is heard by a jury. This amendment helps when someone is trying to sue somebody, they have the right to have a federal jury hear both sides of the story.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a reason the U.S. Supreme Court Justices tend to quote Dickens frequently in their opinions: he usually some good points about the law. When it comes to legal fees, Dickens often pontificated as to whether it was ever possible to have a fair trial when money determined the quality of representation. Two hundred years later and on the opposite side of the Atlantic, this issue is still ripe for debate because regardless of all the services available; social equality in the law does not exist - particularly when it comes to the mentally ill or disabled. This paper will discuss the ethical issues surrounding legal fees, examine the options for representation available, and touch upon how this affects the mentally ill or disabled - a group…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alabama are a clear statement of the importance of the defendant’s right to counsel in a criminal proceeding. The right to counsel has been the source of much controversy within the U.S. law over the past decades. However, in the light of the words of Justice Sutherland, the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel was found a denial of due process. The Powell case holding declared that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required that state courts give defendants an opportunity to obtain counsel for defendants in all capital cases who are not able to afford one and an attorney free of charge in noncapital…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gideon V Wainwright Case

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The criminal justice system has come a long way in providing Due Process for all defendants. Amongst all the opinions, one thing runs the same; each and every defendant must be provided adequate representation for their criminal cases. Whether or not the client can provide their own, legal assistance must be provided as to ensure the defendant’s rights are protected. The right to adequate counsel should never be a luxury only affluent people can provide, but thanks to the Sixth Amendment, every citizen has a right…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He later fought to the Supreme Court, which they appointed a lawyer for him. He would later be acquitted of his crime and the Supreme Court ruled that everyone has the right to an attorney, even if they can’t afford one. Public defenders today do not have the same amount of resources that a private lawyer has. They also deal with multiple cases and they cannot focus on every single one of them like a private attorney can. A private attorney can have at most 5 cases but charge a lot per hour for them.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays