Preview

Case Study Mabo/Essay Federalism

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study Mabo/Essay Federalism
FEDERALISM
Federalism is a form of government which unites separate political entities, within a national system whilst still retaining their independence (AUSTRALIANPOLITICS.COM, 2011). In this essay it will be discussed that the ‘Mabo Decision’ and the implementation of the Native Title Act, 1993, is an example of this and will be analysed whilst unearthing the challenges and benefits which were exhumed within this historical test case, whilst explaining the impact of the High Court Ddecision.

The Australian system of government is a federal system incorporating characteristics of both the British system and that of the United States. The Australian Constitution provides for a Westminster type parliament, an upper house (Senate) and a Lower House (House of Representatives) with an Executive consisting of elected Members of Parliament. The Senate, however, like its United States counterpart, is representative of the States, with the High Court, similar to the United States Supreme Court, as the judicial annotator of the Australian Constitution and the Federal Government 's legislation.

The courts have also played an important role in developing the common law to provide recognition for various human rights. The most historically challenging example of this was the recognition of Aboriginal native title in the Mabo High Court ruling.

MABO CASE BACKGROUND
The ‘Mabo decision’ was named after the leading plaintiff Edward ‘Koiki’ Mabo in a native title challenge put to the government of Queensland and the Federal government of Australia. The other Murray Islander (Meriam people) plaintiffs were: Celuia Mapo Salee, James Rice, Sam Passi and his brother Father Dave Passi.
On May 20, 1982, the plaintiffs’ statement of claim was lodged at the Brisbane registry of the High Court of Australia. The claims lodged included the rights to both land and sea surrounding the island. The state of Queensland’s jurisdiction ended at the 3 mile limit and the Commonwealth



References: (Episode Seven, We are no longer shadows) SBS production DVD, 2008. Trevor Graham, DVD, 1989 Mabo the native Title revolution, viewed 1 October 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mabo Legal Case Study

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    QLD government passes the Declaratoy Act to retrosepectively extinguish native title on QLD’s costal islands.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mabo Case Study Australia

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The term Mabo refers to all issues relating to the Australian High Court judgement in the Mabo v. Queensland case. On the 3rd of June, 1992, after a decade long lawsuit, the High Court ruled that the land title of the Indigenous Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders is recognised at common law. This Indigenous Peoples land title comes from the continuation within common law of their rights over land which pre dates the European colonisation of Australia. In the absence of an effective extinguishment by the crown, this title presents through heritage the original occupants right to possession of their traditional lands in accordance with their customs. The judgement has, at long last, rejected the "Terra Nullius” bringing Australia in line with remaining common law countries. Eddie Mabo had died of cancer in February 1992 so he was not alive to see the final ruling that would become so historic because it completely overruled the idea of Terra Nullius. Nobody could have predicted the changes it made on Australian land law.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this journal article Mercer, discusses the on-going debate surrounding Indigenous Australians land rights claims from the mid-1980s onwards. He then goes on to discuss that the law surrounding land always adhered to the principles of Governor Bourke’s’ Proclamation, until the landmark decision handed down in the Mabo case. However, he concludes that in regard to political climate little else has been done in the advancement of land rights’ legislation in regard to the Indigenous Australian population. He also provides a comparison between how Australia and Canada have responded to Indigenous claims of land, saying that Canada has acted far…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MABO PRACTICE ESSAY PRIDE

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The 1992 Landmarks High Court case abolishing the doctrine of ‘Terra Nullius’; the foundation of Australia’s settlement paved way for the ‘Native Title Act 1993’. Following the 20 year commemoration of the Mabo decision, the 2012 telemovie ‘Mabo’ directed by Rachel Perkins was released. It depicts the life of Murray Islander man and activist Eddie Koiki Mabo and his family in his grueling fight for land rights. Pride comes before the fall – the ego of one stems destruction. Pride is a sense of satisfaction derived from one’s achievements. It is also a feeling of self-worth and dignity. Eddie is of Murray Island decent and this background stems a lot of pride. The Indigenous race have suffered from racist values of society and it is Eddie’s pride in his race that stems his battle for justice and equality.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mabo V State

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mabo and others v State of Queensland (No.2 (1992) HCA 23, is arguably one of the most famous native title claims in Australian history. This case was the first in Australian history to successfully overturn Terra Nullius and essentially led to the creation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (‘The Act’). Terra nullius means land belonging to no one or land that has never been subject to sovereignty of any state and is a part of International Law. The majority of Indigenous People view terra nullius in a negative way, as this term had been used as a means for justifying invasion or takeovers of traditional land. The result of terra –nullius on ATSI (Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders) meant that they have suffered countless wrong doings and injustice towards them.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How and why is power divided in Australia? Is a good and commonly asked question by looking at the Australian Constitution, and federalization it is possible to understand how power is divided within Australia. Through the ideas of the three arms of government following the Montesquieu view, the Washminster hybrid, Westminster and Washington systems of government which all influence Australia’s political system to shape it to what we know it as today. One demonstrates why power is divided in Australia. By doing this it will be easy to see and understand why it is necessary for power to be divided in Australia and how it is done to form a responsible and representative government.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Squirk

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Queensland government reacted to the land rights claim by passing theQueensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act 1985 (Qld) which said that the Torres Strait Islander rights and claims had been extinguished in 1879 when the islands came under the rule of the Queensland government. It was a futile move to stop the Mer people's claim and in 1989 it was overruled as it contravened the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth). The case then came to the High Court of Australia – the highest court in the country.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Mabo brought forth a new yet logical approach to land ownership within Australia through utilising the courts of Australia and it is with this that he and others brought forth a case to the high court of Australia. This case did not only affect Mabo’s land as it would affect all of the indigenous people’s right to land as with the passing of the case it would remove the once placed terra nullius on Australia and allow for aboriginals to once more take ownership of their land. This is evident in a news article from the time titled “Court's ruling destroyed idea of terra nullius” where it states, “The High Court found in favour of the Murray Islanders and overturned the doctrine accepted until then that Australia had been terra nullius”. Henceforth, the methods of Eddie Mabo challenged previously set out laws and regulations and compelled the high courts of Australia to modify it so that the aboriginals would have their rightful ownership of their…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 27th 1967, the Holt Liberal government held a referendum to determine whether or not two sections of the Constitution should be removed, as it discriminated against Aboriginal people. As a result, almost ninety-one percent of Australians voted ‘yes’ to alter these constitutional references. This significant event permitted the Commonwealth Government to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument analysis examines the article Recognise What? Problems with the campaign for constitutional recognition (Maddison, 2017). Published in the May/June issue of the Indigenous Law Bulletin, Maddison describes the process to recognise Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders as the first people of Australia in the constitution. The article explains this process through several accounts, resistance to the campaign and the role of the ‘Recognise’ campaign. Throughout the article, Maddison argues that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders should be recognised as the first people of Australia while acknowledging the problems with the campaign. The analysis will identify the main claims, evidence used to support these claims and the assumptions made by the author. Maddison uses several forms of evidence to support her 3 main claims and the underlying assumptions.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Australian Federal Government introduced the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Recognition Bill 2012 (Cth) (the Bill) to Parliament on 28 November 2012. It was given Royal Assent on 27 March 2013 and became known as the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples Recognition Act 2013 (Cth) (the Act).…

    • 2204 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paul Keating

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A key achievement in Paul Keating’s leadership was the recognition of Indigenous Australian’s rights and acknowledging their position in society. Keating established a Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, working alongside Aboriginal Australians, which sought to implement different strategies to ameliorate the injustices. In June 1992 the High Court recognised Aboriginal land rights by making a decision that native title existed in the Mabo case. Keating supported this notion and delivered the Redfern Speech in December 1992, apologising for the wrongdoings of white society and recognising Aboriginal rights. This was a significant moment and is still recognised today because it was the first time in Australian history that the government attempted to reconcile the relationship with Indigenous Australians. Today, people reflect on this speech and can still find areas that need to be improved upon to ensure an equal society.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mabo Decision was the outcome of the protest led by Eddie Mabo with a group of people from the Murray Islands in Torres Strait claiming that they had ownership of the islands before the white people settled. This act was very successful leading to the High Court deciding that the Murray Islanders were entitled to possession, occupation, enjoyment and use of the lands. The Mabo Decision overturned the concept of Terra Nullius (‘the land belonging to no one’) meaning the Australians recognised that the native title still…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counsel for the defendant suggested that the decision in Ballina Shire Council v Ringland (1994) 33 NSWLR 680 applied to this case and meant that the NSW Aboriginal Land Council could not sue for defamation. The decision was made by Chief Justice Gleeson and President Kirby that a council elected under the Local Government Act 1919 does not have sufficient powers or rights to make a claim for defamation.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics