Preview

Mabo Legal Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
358 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mabo Legal Case Study
Timeline of the court cases in ‘Mabo’ The Queensland land rights case had barely even begun before QLD premier Joh Bjelke-Petersen attempts to prevent it.
QLD government passes the Declaratoy Act to retrosepectively extinguish native title on QLD’s costal islands.
This indicates that the government regognises the potential for the Mabo case to set a precedent that could impact on future land rights claim.
Eddie- tells Netta that the Bjelke-Petersen act is a law “..to kill us all off’
Eddie meets the lawyers and finds out the case is broke and they apply for legal aid.
1986- Eddie returns to Murray Island for the court case to hear


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mabo Case Study Australia

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The term Mabo refers to all issues relating to the Australian High Court judgement in the Mabo v. Queensland case. On the 3rd of June, 1992, after a decade long lawsuit, the High Court ruled that the land title of the Indigenous Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders is recognised at common law. This Indigenous Peoples land title comes from the continuation within common law of their rights over land which pre dates the European colonisation of Australia. In the absence of an effective extinguishment by the crown, this title presents through heritage the original occupants right to possession of their traditional lands in accordance with their customs. The judgement has, at long last, rejected the "Terra Nullius” bringing Australia in line with remaining common law countries. Eddie Mabo had died of cancer in February 1992 so he was not alive to see the final ruling that would become so historic because it completely overruled the idea of Terra Nullius. Nobody could have predicted the changes it made on Australian land law.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal fiction upon which Australia was founded refers to the British doctrine, “terra nullius”. The phrase translates to “land without ownership”. When Australia was founded, even though the colonisers acknowledged the presence of the Indigenous they considered the Aboriginals too primitive to be actual owners. The Aboriginals were considered too primitive with no identifiable hierarchy or political structure. This legal fiction had a significant impact on Australia with the widely known Mabo Case. In May 1982, Eddie Mabo and four other plaintiffs of the Murray Islands pursued confirmation of their traditional land rights in the High Court of Australia. Their claim had been that Murray Island (Mer) had been previously inhabited and had been possessed by the Meriam people with their own social and political organisations. After 10 years and the death of Mabo, on June 3 1992, the High Court ruled that the lands of Australia were not terra nullius when European settlement occurred and the Meriam people were entitled to the lands of Murray Island. Then in December 1993, the Native Title Act was produced as part of the Commonwealth’s response to the High Court’s decision to protect the native lands of Aboriginals. The legal fiction has therefore had a major impact on Australia’s legal history with the introduction of the Native Title Act where the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were compensated for the dispossession of their lands.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although, it is the most useful source since it displays what significant events led up to the Mabo decision and how it was caused. Eddie Mabo learnt he didn’t claim ownership of Mer, the government did. It was then suggested that Eddie Mabo should create a case to claim land rights. Source 1 answers sub-question 1, “Who are the key figures involved?” which are Eddie Mabo, Benny, Noel Loos, Henry Reynolds and the High Court.…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this journal article Mercer, discusses the on-going debate surrounding Indigenous Australians land rights claims from the mid-1980s onwards. He then goes on to discuss that the law surrounding land always adhered to the principles of Governor Bourke’s’ Proclamation, until the landmark decision handed down in the Mabo case. However, he concludes that in regard to political climate little else has been done in the advancement of land rights’ legislation in regard to the Indigenous Australian population. He also provides a comparison between how Australia and Canada have responded to Indigenous claims of land, saying that Canada has acted far…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mabo V State

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mabo and others v State of Queensland (No.2 (1992) HCA 23, is arguably one of the most famous native title claims in Australian history. This case was the first in Australian history to successfully overturn Terra Nullius and essentially led to the creation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (‘The Act’). Terra nullius means land belonging to no one or land that has never been subject to sovereignty of any state and is a part of International Law. The majority of Indigenous People view terra nullius in a negative way, as this term had been used as a means for justifying invasion or takeovers of traditional land. The result of terra –nullius on ATSI (Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islanders) meant that they have suffered countless wrong doings and injustice towards them.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rogerian Paper

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Wiersma, Lindsey L. "Indigenous lands as cultural property: a new approach to indigenous land claims." Duke Law Journal Feb. 2005: 1061+. General OneFile. Web. 4 Oct. 2011.…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Squirk

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Queensland government reacted to the land rights claim by passing theQueensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act 1985 (Qld) which said that the Torres Strait Islander rights and claims had been extinguished in 1879 when the islands came under the rule of the Queensland government. It was a futile move to stop the Mer people's claim and in 1989 it was overruled as it contravened the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth). The case then came to the High Court of Australia – the highest court in the country.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Mabo brought forth a new yet logical approach to land ownership within Australia through utilising the courts of Australia and it is with this that he and others brought forth a case to the high court of Australia. This case did not only affect Mabo’s land as it would affect all of the indigenous people’s right to land as with the passing of the case it would remove the once placed terra nullius on Australia and allow for aboriginals to once more take ownership of their land. This is evident in a news article from the time titled “Court's ruling destroyed idea of terra nullius” where it states, “The High Court found in favour of the Murray Islanders and overturned the doctrine accepted until then that Australia had been terra nullius”. Henceforth, the methods of Eddie Mabo challenged previously set out laws and regulations and compelled the high courts of Australia to modify it so that the aboriginals would have their rightful ownership of their…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 27th 1967, the Holt Liberal government held a referendum to determine whether or not two sections of the Constitution should be removed, as it discriminated against Aboriginal people. As a result, almost ninety-one percent of Australians voted ‘yes’ to alter these constitutional references. This significant event permitted the Commonwealth Government to…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This claim is both substantiated and refuted in the evidence she uses in attempt to back up this claim. As evidence, Maddison uses two accounts from Aboriginal activists. Firstly, Megan Davis, an aboriginal activist and human rights backs up Maddison’s claim as she believes it is the fault of a poor process which has seen a campaign being run before the proposed reform is clear.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Unconscionability

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Critically analyse, explain and evaluate this statement in the light of recently decided case law and academic commentaries.…

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Native Title Analysis

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This process has displayed the development of innovative ways, theories and principles, as well as the termination of the doctrine of ‘terra nullius’, creating justice for ATSI peoples past, present, and future. Native title is a legal right on ATSI communities to use land and live on the land which they have an ongoing connection with. Native title was a problem as it was extremely difficult to determine whether Australia was ‘land belonging to no one’. The Indigenous had to prove they had traditional connections with the land. Law reform was brought about to the ‘terra nullius’ claim by Aboriginal advocates who challenged Australian sovereignty on the terms that ‘terra nullius’ was incorrectly applied. The Native Title Act 1993 and the Native Title Amendment 1998 are the mechanisms that have been put into action. The Native Title Act 1993 came about due to the Mabo cases, and the Native Title Amendment 1998 by the Wik case. When Australia was stated as ‘terra nullius’ ATSI peoples were impacted significantly, they lost all rights they had to their land. It was unjust considering they were the traditional owners of the land. The doctrine of ‘terra nullius’ suggested that Indigenous Australians did not exist as citizens. Law reform began to take place in the Gove Land Right case. The Department of Aboriginal Affairs was founded by the Australian Labour Party in 1972 after the unsuccessful case of the Gove Land Rights. Later a royal commission into land rights was founded and successfully made the Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1976. This is effective law reform as it was the first legislation in Australia to found a land claim process in which traditional owners could claim their land. Within the Mabo cases, the Queensland government enacted the Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act 1985.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Larry hires a lawyer when he learns he is being taken to court. He ends up with…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Native title was not recognised in Australia until 1992 when the High Court in the Mabo decision overturned the doctrine of terra nullius. This led to the legislation of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) and the establishment of the National Native Title Tribunal. Now Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders had the right to make native title claims but this was a very expensive, slow and time-consuming process making it ineffective for Indigenous people to regain ownership of their traditional land. The Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) also restricted the rights of Indigenous Australians.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics