Preview

Cases Related to Malaysian Constitution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4852 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cases Related to Malaysian Constitution
[2013] MLJU 271
Kamalan a/l Shaik Mohd v Pendakwa Raya
HIGH COURT (PULAU PINANG)
YA ZAMANI BIN A RAHIM J
RAYUAN JENAYAH NO 41A-51-05/2012
18 March 2013

Ismail bin Mohamad (Tamil Salvan Tenappan with him) (T Tenappan & Co) for the appellant.
Suhaimi bin Ibrahim (Charanjit Singh a/l Mahinder Singh with him) (Deputy Public Prosecutors) for the prosecution.
YA Zamani Bin A Rahim J:
GROUNDS OF DECISION
[1] The appellant, a police sergeant (hereinafter referred to as "the accused") was an investigating officer attached to Bukit Mertajam Police Station. Among his duties, was to investigate commercial crime cases.
[2] The accused was originally charged, at the instant of Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia, with two offences under s 10(a)(aa) of Anti Corruption Act, 1997 and s 11(a) of of Anti Corruption Act, 1997 Anti Corruption Act, 1997 respectively at Butterworth Sessions Court which ended with his acquittal. These are corruption cases.
[3] The accused too was indicted with two charges at Bukit Mertajam Magistrate's Court under s 193 and s 217 (hereinafter referred to as " s 193 and s 217 charges") respectively under the Penal Code. The s 193 and s 217 charges against the accused were at the instant of the police and they read as follows :
1) S 193 charge
Bahawa kamu pada 19.9.2004 jam 8.00 pagi sehingga 22.9.2004 jam 4 petang di Pejabat Pegawai Penyiasat Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Seberang Perai Tengah, di dalam Daerah Seberang Perai Tengah, di dalam Negeri Pulau Pinang, semasa jalankan siasatan bersabit Bukit Tengah Report 3671/2004, SPT/IP No. 2595/2004, kamu telah menyatakan di bawah S 119 Kanun Acara Jenayah iaitu catatan prosiding harian kes tersebut bahawa kamu (1) mengambil tangkapan bernama Cheah Liau Khuan KPT : 630809-07-5196 daripada lokap Balai Polis Kubang Semang pada 20.9.2004 dan 21.9.2004 untuk dijalankan soal siasat dan selepas itu dihantar balik ke lokap tersebut, (2) merakam percakapan di bawah S 113 tangkapan Cheah Liau Khuan

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    R V. Shankar Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Held: The decision of the court was Shankar was charged and convicted of two counts of possession of loaded, prohibited firearms and public mischief (appealed and dismissed)…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    4)What was Nguyen was convicted of at the trial court level? (page 2 of the opinion)…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This civil case was taken the supreme court. The supreme court dismissed a civil case taken by a murderer named Hazairin Iskandar. He sued, Zulfriki Mahbur and two acquaintances ,Aminah Theglory and Wahyu sasterawan. Hazairin Iskandar claims that his brother sold taxi while he was in prison. He sued the two acquaintances claimg that they deceptively sold both his taxi’s and taxi licence plates while he was in custody in May 2010. Iskander was jailed for about 17 years for killing of mohd shah seamin. Who had been having an affair with his wife, nita iskandar. He and his son committed that murder in februrary 2010.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2 years the trial ended with the verdict of guilty on the account of…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Case Letter

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR – List what was unfair about the arrest and first trial PG 3…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Per Judge LJ R. v. Misra and Srivastava [2004] EWCA Crim 2375 para 64 (in the Court of Appeal Criminal Division)…

    • 2780 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Yahoo News (2013) CPIB Officer in Corruption Case, Available at: http://sg.news.yahoo.com/dpm-teo--latest-high-profile-cpib-case--particularly-serious--041014485.html (Accessed: 1st September 2013)…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The victim was one of the followings and the murder was related to the performance of the victim official duties in the justice system…

    • 115 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Leader Report

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Malaysia: the trial of opposition parliamentarian Lim Guan Eng : an update. (1997). London: Amnesty International, International Secretariat.…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On July 20, 1907, the Pf was whipped 20 times with a rattan by an order by the Df. Pf complained to the Police Magistrate, Df was angered and ordered Pf to be confined and caused the Pf to be tied up to a stake & had him whipped a 100(x), placed Pf under confinement for 2 months and finally dismissed Pf’s service. A Muslim, who died in Penang, devises his entire property Issue Pf filed an action for assault, battery and false imprisonment against the Df for $600.…

    • 6658 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Delima

    • 1902 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The case is about an enterprise founded by family members and later was incorporated as Sdn Bhd. The shareholders were mainly the directors of husband and wife who were involved in the management of the company. The company involved in trading and engineering service3s. The company has limited financial resources. Based on the audit finding the records were not properly kept and no procedures and financial system were in place and lacked internal control. The auditors were not able to express a true & fair view on the accounts and recommended to qualify the audited accounts.…

    • 1902 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Akaayar Gemanam V. Tarkaa Nyoughur & ors Citation: (1997) LPELR-CA/J/59/95 in the Court of Appeal Jos Judicial Division, Tuesday, 6/05/1997.…

    • 7028 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recognition Rites Speeches

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Based on the information revealed by Hon Pedro M. Ureta he was threatened by the aforesaid person and it was validated by Tangalan Police Station.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    English Law

    • 5366 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Edition.KualaLumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.2) Wu Min Aun . 2000. The Malaysian Legal System. 2…

    • 5366 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9(B)(1)(b) of the Indian Explosives Act, Sec. 25(1)(a) of the Indian Arms Act, and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act. The date of birth of the petitioner, as per the School Transfer Certificate, is 11.5.1987. At the time of arrest, he was studying in standard 'X'. On 23.11.2002 and 24.11.2002, the Special Task Force and 'Q' Branch CID made a joint combing operation to nab naxalites in Dharmapuri District. In connection with the same, they entered the petitioner's house in search of his father. As his father was not available, they arrested the petitioner, who was sitting in the house, and foisted a case against him. They produced the petitioner before the Judicial Magistrate , Uthangarai on 25.11.2002. The Magistrate, without enquiring whether he was a juvenile mechanically remanded him to judicial custody. The petitioner was placed along with other alleged naxalite prisoners. A bail petition was moved before the Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri, in Crl.M.P.No.68 of 2002. Regarding his age, the petitioner was subjected Special Court, Poonamallee requiring the production of the juvenile petitioner on 19.2.2003 was also enclosed. The POTA Special Court does not have jurisdiction to try a juvenile, when there is an Act, viz. Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the JJ (C& PC) Act) to…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays