Liz Fleischer
Analyze the effectiveness of political compromise in reducing sectional tensions in the period 1820-1861.
I. Introduction
1. Background Information
a. sectional tensions had been causing disjunction between the North and the South ever since the the country’s founding
b. political compromises were supposed to fix the issues but usually only led to temporary resolving of the problems
c. slavery was the cause of the sectional tensions
d. while cotton was king in the South, the North was rapidly industrializing
2. Thesis
a. The Compromise of 1820, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Compromise of 1850 were ineffective in reducing the sectional tensions in the period 1820-1861.
II. Body Paragraph 1.
1. Compromise of 1820
i. The Facts:
1. Maine enters as a free state
2. Missouri enters as a slave state
3. Slavery is prohibited above the 36 30 parallel.
4. created by Henry Clay ii. The Analysis:
1. contradicted itself because Missouri is above the 36 30 parallel and it had slavery
2. position of the line ultimately allowed for an uneven balance of slave states and free states
3. the division of the country by an official line promotes sectionalism
III. Body Paragraph 2
1. Kansas-Nebraska Act
i. The Facts:
1. Popular sovereignty for Kansas-Nebraska territory
2. divided territory into two parts (Kansas and Nebraska)
3. one likely to become a free state and one likely to become a slave state
4. repealed Compromise of 1820
5. Created by Stephen Douglas ii. The Analysis:
1. Created disorganization as to what states could be free and what states could be slave
2. Destroyed the Whig Party, divided the Democratic Party, created the Republican party
3. Caused disruption in the political balance of the country
IV. Body Paragraph 3
1. Compromis of 1850
i. The Facts:
1. Created by Henry Clay (Ultimately passed through Congress by Seward, Davis and Douglas)
2. TX gets 10 million dollars for giving up claims to Utah and New Mexico
3. California entered as a free state
4. Utah and New Mexico get popular soverignty
5. Slave trade abolished in D.C. but slavery still leagal
6. Tougher fugitive slave laws ii. Analysis:
1. Slave laws force North to pass personal liberty laws
2. Not everyone supported it
3. Kept the nation’s capitol as a slave district
4. Passed for self intrest of the creaters but not for the well being of the nation iii. Put off the crisis and allowed the situation to get worse
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
a. They persisted it not only as an economically punitive in the short run, but as a possible wedge for later federal interference with slavery in the southern states…
- 4939 Words
- 20 Pages
Good Essays -
1) What was the relationship between the former Confederate states and the federal Union? What should be demanded of those states before they were regarded as reconstructed?…
- 3995 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
8. What was the difference in treatment of the city slave as opposed to the country slave?…
- 258 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
b. Did he think that the Missouri Compromise resolved the controversy surrounding Missouri 's admission to the Union? Why or why not?…
- 672 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
their designation as either free or slave states. The destiny of Kansas, however, had been tied…
- 10126 Words
- 41 Pages
Powerful Essays -
2. Emancipation proclamation- freed slaves in the CSA, so did not affect slavery in the border states; allowed blacks to join Union Army…
- 543 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
III. These dependence on cotton and therefore slaves was at a time when slavery was in question - being outlawed in many places and slave trade was outlawed completely…
- 2995 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
6. Compare and contrast the causes and results of two of the following independence movements?…
- 386 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
2) Recaptured by federal troop, but proved to be a political success. Brown used his treason charges to put slavery on trial…
- 3753 Words
- 16 Pages
Good Essays -
Several reasons highlighted behind the division, such as; states’ rights and disagreements over tariffs and the most influential issue about slavery (Tindall…
- 1259 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
slavery and protected it where it existed, but the new territory was governed by a "higher law…
- 826 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Missouri Compromise, in many ways made political conditions worse between the North and South. For a long time the North and South had been fighting about political issues such as slavery. The North believed that it was wrong to capture, enslave and ship Africans to America to work in harsh conditions for free for White owners. The South, on the other hand believed slavery was right and should be used for helping the economy and producing cash crops so the North could use the supplies to make products. But the addition of new states, especially an uneven number made the tension grow between the two sides on the decision of slavery.…
- 299 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
6. How were the following used as methods of controlling not only the slave population but poor whites…
- 1538 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
II. The Amendments to the Constitution, the Constitutional issues, and/or the important issues in the case…
- 364 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the 1800’s there was much turmoil over the debate of slavery and whether it was inhumane or not. Slavery caused the nation to separate into 2 factions; the north, who believe in abolishing slavery and the south who thought that slavery was a “benign institution” as quoted by Ulrich B. Phillips. There is much debate whether slavery was the prominent cause of the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, slavery was not the ultimate cause of the Civil War; in fact the economic, cultural, and political differences between the North and South played more prominent roles in the instigation of the Civil War and influenced the beginnings of slavery.…
- 683 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays