Preview

Cavour and Garibaldi in Italian Unification

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cavour and Garibaldi in Italian Unification
Compare and contrast the roles of Cavour and Garibaldi in Italian Unification between 1852 and 1861

It is undeniable that both Camillo de Cavour and Giuseppe Garibaldi both played integral roles in the unification of Italy. These men dedicated their lives to the creation of one cultural and political entity. They also made many great strides towards this unification that very well may have not happened, or at least would not have happened in the same way, if they had not existed. Yet despite this common aim, it is remarkable how much these men differed in their actions and strategies. At times the nature of the actions of these men were so greatly different that they hindered the road to unification. Cavour and Garibaldi, although both dedicated to and aiming for Italian Unification, differed greatly in their methods and actions. The changes in Europe in the 19th century, including those a great as Italian Unification, were greatly catalyzed by the brilliance of the political insight of those elite members of society. This included that of Cavour. As a master of foreign policy he also had a deep understanding of the relationship between national and international events. With this understanding and his political skills, he was able to manipulate foreign policy to support unification. He used his international power and alliances to achieve his domestic goals. For example, he allied with France and Prussia when he felt it necessary. Cavour also had credibility as a monarch which no doubt helped facilitate his political power. Cavour was also a realist which can be seen in his political practices, specifically that of Realpolitik. This was the idea that politics must be conducted by realistic assessments of power and the self interest of individual nation states. Cavour exactly utilized this notion. He had the upper hand in international politics which Garibaldi would never achieve. Cavour was largely responsible for many of the political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Garibaldi= southern Italian leader of unification, raised army of Red Shirts, went to Sicily to help revolt vs Bourbon king. Won Sicily, marched up Italian Peninsula.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the period 1896 – 1915, the condition of Italy was relatively in a terrible state in many ways with various political, economic and social problems that hindered the country’s progress. Italy’s Liberal Governments during this period were generally very unsuccessful in dealing with these inherited and growing problems clearly contributing to the end of Liberalism in Italy. More so, the Liberal Government under the rule of Giolitti saw Italy progressing in some circumstances regarding the socio-economic concerns. Nonetheless, it is very comprehensible that the Liberal Governments lacked solving the problems that they faced.…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though some wanted to stick to tradition, there were some important and influential people who encouraged the unification. Giuseppe Mazzini, attorney, believed that Italy deserved to be a nation and it was about time all the parts of the monarchy to be part of one big republic in unification. Along with Mazzini, Carlo Cattaneo, philosopher and political activist, also believed in the unification of this monarchy would be a right step for Italy. He said that even though it would mix them, it won’t take their culture and traditions off the grid like they believed, but instead, they would all be appreciated and remembered. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest of Piedmont stated that the unification would actually make the kings stronger without damaging their own independence.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was Austria responsible for the failure of Italian revolutionaries in the years 1820-49?…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let the Marches, and Umbria, and Sabina, and the Roman Campania, and the land of Naples rise, so as to bring division into the forces of our enemy!…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gracchi Glory

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages

    While the Gracchi brothers were motivated by the serious need for reform and equality in the Roman state, the methods they adopted led to both their political failure, and their violent, untimely ends. Both brothers were “genuinely committed to the interest of the people”[1], however the means adopted to fulfil their good intentions only led to tragedy and discontent. In attempting to implement political reform and break the monopoly…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Italian people were living in the control of foreign rulers. The ideal Italian leaders were Giuseppe Mazzini, Cavour, and Giuseppe Garibaldi. Mazzini centralized the republic and gave more emphasis on the right and the will of the people. Next, Gioberti headed the federation of existing states, and then Italian nations were built around the aristocratic kingdom of Sardinia-Piedmont as german looked towards Prussia. Cavour has played a prominent role in the Sardinina government from the period 1850 to 1861. He was recognized as a dominant figure during that time. In 1852, Cavour was elected as a chief minister in the Sardinian monarchy. Likewise Cavour made the necessary arrangements and took actions wisely in order to integrate northern and central Italy. Also, Cavour acquainted several programs of railroads, highways, civil liberties and provided assistance for Sardinia. Moreover, with the help of France, he achieved victory over Austria and Lombardy. Thereafter Garbaldi removed the Sicily kingdom and then finally in 1860, southern Italy and Sicily was given to…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, more importantly in my opinion, the end of the war revealed that Italy lacked the diplomatically-savvy leaders because, as “the ruling coalition included many divergent points of view, her traditional system of government made this almost inevitable”.10 The public was confused about national interests and began to question whether the traditional system was really the best, be it the Liberals, the Socialists or the…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    5 Paragraph Assignment

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1850 there were many political coalitions in central Europe such as Italy, Germany and Russia, who used strong national pride for national unification purposes. Count Camillo Cavour managed to remove Austrian influence from all parts of Italy through a series of wars, thus spurring intense nationalism. Giuseppe Garibaldi, another Italian nationalist, raised a volunteer army in 1860 and drove Spain from the Kingdom of Two Siciles, thereby uniting all of Italy under Victor Emmanuel. Similarly, Otto von Bismarck, appointed by William I in 1861, was able to unite Germany through the Franco-Prussian war. In 1871, the victorious Bismarck crowned King William I as emperor of the new German Empire, and a strong and proud Germany emerged. In Russia, Alexander III, through a policy known as Russification, demanded all Russians, including people in the far-flung reaches of the Empire were made to learn the Russian language and convert to Russian Orthodoxy. Those that didn’t were persecuted (primarily the Jews) and led to many nonconformist to flee Russia. Through this forceful process, Russia was successfully united in language and…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Cavour: Prime Minister of Piedmont-Sardinia from 1852 until his death, had a realpolitiker’s vision, promoted economic development, to unify Italy he had to confront Austria so he got help from Napoleon who feared growth of Piedmont and gave them Lombardy but not Venetia to Piedmont and left the rest of Italy disunited, helped achieve a strong economy, modern army, liberal political climate…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prime Minister Otto Von Bismarck and Prime Minister Count Camillo Benso di Cavour were powerful men who believed in politics based on practical objectives rather than on ideals, also referred to as Realpolitik. Bismarck sought to unify Germany while Cavour sought to unify Italy. Looking at which one was more effective as a leader it is my opinion that Otto Von Bismarck was most effective in the success of his nation.…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This movement is one example of how a movement that also shows nationalism characteristics can create unification among Italy. The Congress of Vienna and the end of Napoleonic rule lead to a nationalism increase for Italy. This increase brought unity because the people starting feeling as though they had a say in what was happening instead of having one person make all the decisions. This group and the end of this rule demonstrates how there can be a unity increase coming from any sort of source. Finally, in March 1861, a parliament of all of Italy except Rome and Venetia, agreed on unifying Italy with Victor Emmanuel as its first king.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fundamentally, both Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler had the same burning desire to each make their nation a respected and economically impregnable Great Power. Mussolini wanted to return Italy to its glory days of the ancient Roman Empire, a domestic policy amongst others which was used as propaganda and to ultimately consolidate his power. A strong economy and a united state were vital for both countries in case of the outbreak of yet another catastrophic war. "Everything in the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state", stated Mussolini in need of desperate backup at home. Post WWI left both Germany and Italy with grave problems economically, which further repelled into social problems such as high unemployment and inflation, crucial issues which had to be dealt with domestically. In addition to this, Hitler wanted to implement his ideological aims which included German rearmament, racial purity and the consolidation of his power which were reflected in his domestic policies. This essay will compare the similarities and differences of the domestic policies of both Hitler and Mussolini, and state to what extent one leader was more successful than the other in achieving his policy.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays