Nicotine is commonly known as a stimulant, stimulants speed up metabolic processes, cellular respiration is a metabolic process. CO2 production is an indicator of cellular respiration. With these facts a hypothesis stating that the rate of cellular respiration will increase in higher concentrations of nicotine, which can be observed by the increase of CO2 production. Cellular respiration is the most efficient way for cells to harvest energy stored in food. Cellular respiration is defined as the aerobic harvesting of energy from food molecules; the energy-releasing chemical breakdown of food molecules and the storage of potential energy in a form the cell can use to perform work (ATP). This exergonic reaction, meaning a reaction that produces energy, uses a series of three metabolic processes, glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation, to break down polymers, such as carbohydrates into smaller glucose molecules. During cellular respiration glucose molecules and oxygen(O2) are converted into carbon dioxide (CO2), water(H2O), and the ultimate goal, energy …show more content…
Using a cotton ball a small amount of distilled water was dabbed on each of 6 mealworms. The mealworms were then placed into an Erlenmeyer flask using the forceps. Using the ring stand and clamp to keep the flask in place the CO2 sensor and datalogger were inserted into the flask and initial and final CO2 readings were recorded.(Use pages 105-108 in General Biology, Bio 101 Laboratory manual 2010-2011 for correct usage and setup of datalogger) This procedure was then repeated and recorded 2 additional times. Next, for treatments 1, 2, and 3 a graduated cylinder was used to accurately measure 500ml of distilled water into beaker A, 50ml into beaker B and 5ml into beaker C. .2g of tobacco was then added to each beaker. This allowed testing of different concentrations of nicotine on the cellular respiration of the mealworms, giving more in-depth results to prove or reject the hypothesis. The mealworms were then removed from the flask and dabbed with the lowest concentrated solution, beaker A. The mealworms were gently placed back into the flask, as in the control treatment. The initial and final CO2 readings were recorded a total of 3 times. The entire process of treatment 1 was then repeated in treatments 2 and 3 using beakers B(50ml concentration) and C(5ml