b. He demonstrated the value of strong executive leadership; he led common people into national politics; he united them into a powerful and long-lived Democratic party; and he proved people can be trusted with the vote…
2. No bank of the United States-Van Buren opposed not only the creation of a new Bank of the United States but also the placing of Government funds in state banks. He fought for the establishment of an independent treasury system to handle…
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American War, but it started a whole new debate about the extension of slavery, with Northerners rallying around the Wilmot Proviso (which proposed that the Mexican Cession lands be free soil); however, the Southerners shot it down.…
2) Recaptured by federal troop, but proved to be a political success. Brown used his treason charges to put slavery on trial…
The Liberty Party formed to advocate the total elimination of slavery. Although abolitionists were effective as social agitators, they were less skilled in political organization. The Liberty Party reached its peak of influence in the presidential election of 1844 and still only received 62,300 of the votes, about 2.3%. The total elimination of slavery was too radical for the majority to accept. Less radical movements took hold in the Free-Soil and Republican parties that opposed the further expansion of slavery but accepted its place in the Union.3…
iv.The Republican Party prevented the development of a land distribution system, but supported other methods to aid the freed slaves…
Slavery created a unique problem for the nation. Though slavery was abolished in the north slave owners in the south argued the importance of slavery for their state’s economic prosperity. One problem is the nation had nothing set forth in the constitution that could guide them to a national solution. The founding fathers had not only wished to create a strong country but also emphasized the importance of state’s sovereignty. It was this idea of state’s being responsible for their own decisions and laws…
The increase in sectionalism and the tensions that arose from it was surprising to me because I naively assumed the United States was for the most completely united at this point in Antebellum America. The political polarization and its dramatic impact on the political landscape of the 1850s was very interesting to learn about. The creation of two political parties, Democrats and Whigs, really cemented the notion of the divide between North and South. The rise of such parties as the Free-Soil Party and the Know-Nothings, or the American Party, is very reminiscent of today’s political climate. While the undertones of the slavery debate create divides even within political parties, the concerns of the nativist movement shifting towards the immigration…
The war affected political balance with pro and anti slavery states and if slavery had been allowed in the newly acquired Mexican territory, the slaveholding states would acquire greater representation in congress. Another consequence during the mexican american war is that there were tensions between Mexican and American immigrants that grew with the…
Question: To capture the presidency in 1860, the Republican Party needed to win all of the following except: Student answered: a) the upper North Correct answer: d) one or more southern states…
Second, and closely related, was the issue of whether the roughly four million freedmen should be allowed to vote. The issue was how to receive the four million former slaves as citizens. If they were to be fully counted as citizens, some sort of representation for apportionment of seats in Congress had to be determined. Before the war, the population of slaves had been counted as three-fifths of a corresponding number of free whites. By having four million freedmen counted as full citizens, the South would gain additional seats in Congress. If blacks were denied the vote and the right to hold office, then only whites would represent them. Many conservatives, including most white southerners, northern Democrats, and some northern Republicans, opposed black voting. Some northern states that had referenda on the subject limited the ability of their own small populations of blacks to vote.…
Many looked to the Constitution and what the Founding Fathers explicitly stated for guidance on the matter. Pro and anti-slavery supporters debated over the Founding Fathers’ intentions regarding slavery and its expansion. The Republican Party Platform of 1860 opposed the expansion of slavery into the West and was against the reopening of the slave trade. “That the maintenance of the principles promulgated in the Declaration of Independence and embodied in the Federal Constitution, “That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,” is essential to the preservation of our Republican institutions; and that the Federal Constitution, the Rights of the States, and the Union of the States must and shall be preserved.” (Republican Party Platform, 1860).…
They wanted farm families to settle the western territories and install democratic republican values and institutions there. Motivating its members –mostly white yeomen farmers was their belief that slavery benefited “aristocratic men”. The Wilmot Proviso of 1846 was an event that prompted the creation of The Free Soil Party. The Wilmot Proviso was a bold attempt by opponents of slavery to prevent its introduction in the territories purchased from Mexico following the Mexico War. The Proviso never passed through Congress, but it did ignite an intense national debate over slavery that led to the creation of the antislavery Republican Party in 1854.…
In the 1800’s there was much turmoil over the debate of slavery and whether it was inhumane or not. Slavery caused the nation to separate into 2 factions; the north, who believe in abolishing slavery and the south who thought that slavery was a “benign institution” as quoted by Ulrich B. Phillips. There is much debate whether slavery was the prominent cause of the Civil War. Contrary to popular belief, slavery was not the ultimate cause of the Civil War; in fact the economic, cultural, and political differences between the North and South played more prominent roles in the instigation of the Civil War and influenced the beginnings of slavery.…
Ex. is that when slavery still existed, different territories had different opinions so, they let each territory decide if they wanted slavery or not..…