Childhood Vaccination Essay
Disease has been a constant source of death and hardship for the human race since their inception. Science, as a whole, has since then attempted to remedy the problem with its usage of vaccinations. The concept of a vaccination is the stimulation of one’s immune system in order to better protect itself against any sort of infectious disease. However, no matter the benefits of an application of induced immunity, people in modern times have called vaccinations into question over the amount of misinformation and the infringement on personal beliefs they represent especially when it comes to children. In the article, “Current Controversies in Childhood Vaccination”, written by Dr. Marisa Carillo-Marquez and Dr. Lisa White, vaccines are displayed
…show more content…
With legislation being pushed to pass making it so that children will not be able to attend public schools without keeping up with their vaccinations, parents are furious at the lack of control and choice this decision would create. By being seen as a restriction on children, parents become more and more unwilling to comply with efforts to vaccine all children against preventable diseases. These viewpoints are captured in an article written by authors Anna L. North and Dr. Linda M. Niccolai titled “Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Requirements in US Schools: Recommendations for Moving Forward” that was published in the American Journal of Public Health. The writers bring the lower than optimal amount of HPV vaccine acceptance into account by explaining that, “acceptance of HPV vaccine is low when requirements are introduced” (North and Niccoli 1768). The writers are using the appeal of logos to present the fallacies of current systems to implement mandatory vaccines. This evidence supports the idea that parents are resisting giving their children the vaccine because of the supposed infringement on personal choice it represents. This point is further expanded when the writers explain, “requirements that are enacted poorly or unnecessarily may jeopardize the legitimacy and effectiveness of requirements for that vaccine and other
With legislation being pushed to pass making it so that children will not be able to attend public schools without keeping up with their vaccinations, parents are furious at the lack of control and choice this decision would create. By being seen as a restriction on children, parents become more and more unwilling to comply with efforts to vaccine all children against preventable diseases. These viewpoints are captured in an article written by authors Anna L. North and Dr. Linda M. Niccolai titled “Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Requirements in US Schools: Recommendations for Moving Forward” that was published in the American Journal of Public Health. The writers bring the lower than optimal amount of HPV vaccine acceptance into account by explaining that, “acceptance of HPV vaccine is low when requirements are introduced” (North and Niccoli 1768). The writers are using the appeal of logos to present the fallacies of current systems to implement mandatory vaccines. This evidence supports the idea that parents are resisting giving their children the vaccine because of the supposed infringement on personal choice it represents. This point is further expanded when the writers explain, “requirements that are enacted poorly or unnecessarily may jeopardize the legitimacy and effectiveness of requirements for that vaccine and other