Chirstopher Grau Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind Analysis
In "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and the Morality of Memory,” Chirstopher Grau examines the concept of memory removal from several philosophical viewpoints. The author includes the Utilitarian approach, where such a device would be applauded (and morally required) for it would increase happiness and lessen suffering. However, Grau also notes that since we learn from painful experiences, "denying (someone) useful information...would probably not be for the best...(maximum utility)," and consequently, not fulfill the Utilitarian objective (121). The author also analyzes the concept of memory removal from the ethical viewpoints voiced by Nagel, Nozick and Murdoch. However, the most poignant argument concerns the conscience choice
of obliterating memories, which is in direct opposition to Kant's proclamation of self respect and a "duty to...never use yourself solely as a means to an end" (124). Thus, memory removal is a form of "self-mutilation," and a failure to realize one's worth (124). Kant's theory is also based on autonomy, which requires one's authentic self, achieved through self reflection, free of any external forces which would impede this process. Consequently, memory removal would be considered a device that would disrupt this process, and hinder autonomy. By utilizing Kant's theory as a backdrop, one can see that Joel and Clementine made an unethical decision to chose memory removal, and due to depression and self-destruction, lacked the autonomy required to even make such a choice.
of obliterating memories, which is in direct opposition to Kant's proclamation of self respect and a "duty to...never use yourself solely as a means to an end" (124). Thus, memory removal is a form of "self-mutilation," and a failure to realize one's worth (124). Kant's theory is also based on autonomy, which requires one's authentic self, achieved through self reflection, free of any external forces which would impede this process. Consequently, memory removal would be considered a device that would disrupt this process, and hinder autonomy. By utilizing Kant's theory as a backdrop, one can see that Joel and Clementine made an unethical decision to chose memory removal, and due to depression and self-destruction, lacked the autonomy required to even make such a choice.