Preview

Cja 354 Insanity Defense Paper

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
669 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cja 354 Insanity Defense Paper
Insanity Defense Paper
Angela Harris, Samantha Kunz, Jermaine Kelley
CJA/354
June 8, 2014
Ann Perry

We believe that the defendant may not be competent to stand trial, due to the fact that he had has emotionally and mental issues. The defendant has no knowledge of the crime or its consequences, if put on the stand he may revert back to that emotional state of mind and will not be able to give and accurate statement and will not be able to understand charges and sentencing.

As a team we believe that Stu Dents is certainly not competent to stand trial due to the fact he is emotionally and mentally unstable. He clearly believes he is of higher power, while being arrested he kept stating he was god. While the officers were searching his home they found a room full of pictures of the victim. Mr. Dents displayed signs of obsessive compulsive disorder which while not severe is a mental illness on its own. Mr. Dents also displayed signs of psychotic disorders. One symptom of psychotic disorders would be hallucinations. It is apparent Mr. Dents suffers from hallucination he mistook a police officer for an alien.
…show more content…
The State of New York applied the M 'Naghten rule to the insanity defense until 1965. The M’Naghten rule to the insanity defense states that a defendant should not be held responsible for his actions only if their mental disease was severe enough that they did not know their act would be wrong, or they did not know the nature and quality of their actions. There is much criticism over if the individual committing the act new the act was wrong and could control their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mr. Jackson, the Appellate, was a mentally deficient deaf. He wasn’t able to read, write or communicate. The Appellate was charged with robbery of two different women. Appellant robbed the women for four and five dollars respectively. Appellant was found to be incompetent to stand trial at an incompetency hearing. The Court ordered Appellant to be committed until he was competent to stand trial.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John R. Harig Case Study

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    MILLERSBURG — Found competent to stand trial, outstanding motions to dismiss the charge against a Marshallville man and have the amount of bail revisited will have to wait for another day, one on which he can be in court with his attorney.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dusky Case Summary

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    US the Supreme Court established guidelines that satisfy due process in regards to one’s competency to stand trial. The Supreme Court determined that the court must find the defendant able to rationally, and functionally understand the charges and proceedings against them, and have a present ability to assist their attorney in their defense. It is not merely enough for one to be oriented as to person, place, and time. This standard goes on to define both the cognitive and interpersonal aspects of competency to stand trial . The cognitive element is the ability to know and understand the charges and legal process being taken. The interpersonal element is in regards to the ability of the client to assist their attorney. Moreover, the Dusky standard confirms that under Higgins v. McGrath (1951), a defendant who suffers from a severe mental mental disorder may still be competent to stand trial if the defendant can understand and assist their attorney. Furthermore, because of these new guidelines, Dusky was retried and received a guilty verdict however, his sentencing was reduced by more than half. He was sentenced to 20 years with eligibility for parole in 5 years in comparison to serving the original sentence of 45…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Nevada, 1996991 P. 2d 1183People in the United States commit crimes and make up excuses why they should not be held accountable for a crime. Insanity and temporary Insanity have significant differences. One might ask themselves is there really any meaningful difference? During the history of our court system there has been many significant court decisions which address the controversy topics of insanity and temporary insanity as it relates to criminal procedures. One of the most significant court decision is Miller Vs State Supreme Court of Nevada, 1996 991 P.2d 1183.…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ralph Tortoric Case Essay

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During this conversation, Judge Rosen made note that Ralph responded to each question appropriately and asked questions back to the judge. We have to understand that we are not looking at what his mental state of mind was at the time of the incident, rather his mental state of mind at the time of the trial. Therefore, when Ralph was found to be competent to stand trial it was believed that he understood the nature of the charges against him and could, if he chose to do so, aid in his defense. KU CJ100 *Emily A. Singleton-Burruano* 3 I am not disagreeing with the fact that Mr. Tortorici was mentally ill, this is clearly evident. However, he committed a crime and it was time to face the punishment for that crime. I feel that he was treated fairly in the trial but I would have liked to see a court ordered follow up psychiatric treatment plan in place for Tortorici. In my opinion, regardless of the crime that is committed or the mental state of the offender at the time of the incident, the offender should be punished according to the crime they have…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The legal definition of insanity stated by therapist Bryan Howes is “n. mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.” Which emphasizes the idea that if an individual is not in control of their actions, then they are to be considered insane. In some cases, this period of “unawareness” can compose dangerous situations depending on what actions are performed in his/her unconscious state of mind.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Insanity defense first came into England’s radar when Daniel McNaughton, who attempted to murder, Prime Minister Robert Peel. McNaughton Rule became a common law test to determine criminal liability in relation to mentally disturbed defendants. Another notable case is that of Reagan, John Hinckley who in 1981 attempted to assassinate the president.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The basic outline for competency to stand trial is for a person to be aware of the proceedings, know what they are being charged with, and the ability to interact with attorney to work on their own defense. This seem like a simple and easy task to take place, but each year numerous people are unaware of what is happening to them when they are arrested and brought in for initial hearing. Competency is something that can easily be missed if not addressed early on, once noticed the attorney or prosecution may ask for a competency evaluation. The judge holds the decision in his hand but once the issue of competency is raised it would be…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain how a determinist view of free will versus a libertarianism view of free will changes the argument for the insanity defense, and capital punishment.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under the Model Penal Code (MPC) test, a criminal defendant must be found not guilty by reason of insanity if he is diagnosed with a relevant mental defect a person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law. My client Hinckley suffers from a severe, chronic mental disorder. My client did not act on his own volition, but that his life was controlled by his pathological obsession with the movie, Taxi Driver, starring Jodie Foster. In that movie, the title character stalks the president and fights in a shootout. Hinckley's saw the movie…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harris, M. (2013, January 14). Insanity plea repeated. In The Baltimore Sun . Retrieved March…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As the defense attorney in the case of State v. Stu Dents it is hard to argue against the insurmountable evidence that the authorities collected at the home of Stu Dents following the murder of his girlfriend Uma Opee. Among the items was a journal which the defendant started to write in six months prior to the incident. With this evidence the prosecutor speculates that Mr. Dent planned and calculated this vicious act. While the journal shows substantial incriminating evidence against Mr. Dents it also illustrates the mind of a very disturbed and confused person. Entries in the journal discuss purchasing certain items that were allegedly used during the murder, however in his confused state of mind he also made references of aliens, God, and the end of the world. The court should consider this not to be an act of a premeditated murderer, but an individual who is suffering from severe mental illness. Confirmation of his…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mary Barnett, the defendant, should not be held responsible for the actions taken and she should clearly be put under the care of the doctors in a health facility. Taking under consideration that Mary is mentally ill and has postpartum depression, she should not be put in jail for it.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The judge felt that Ralph could distinguish between the presiding parties in the courtroom, and he is able to assist in his own defense, hence he is competent to stand trial. However, as the prosecutor who took the case on said, by the spirit of competency Ralph did not meat the criteria, but by legal definition he was competent to stand trial. The 4 experts that the defense called to stand verified that Ralph is suffering from a severe delusion and that he did not know the nature of what he was doing and the consequences of such actions. Ralph and other mentally ill defendants have to face a system which intentions are to prosecute and find someone guilty of a crime. Also, to somehow re-pay the victims and the community, however, those mind…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Program

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    At issue in the Barefoot case were the pronouncements of a prosecution psychiatrist who did not interview the defendant, but believed that there was ‘‘100% and absolute chance’’ that the defendant would still end up being dangerous. According to Krauss, Liberman, & Olson this testimony was said to be constitutional by the court even though the existing studies of mental professionals’ ability to predict dangerousness suggested that these predictions were wrong two out of three times. A number of studies have showed that jurors’ final decisions are strongly influenced by expert psychological testimony when it is presented on a variety of psycho-legal issues from the inaccuracy of eyewitness identification.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays