Preview

Clan of the Cave Bear

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
706 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Clan of the Cave Bear
Portrayals of prehistory in popular books, films, and television programs are sometimes more interesting for what they tell us about contemporary life than for what they reveal about ancient cultures. In the Clan of the Cave Bear (and the books that followed it) a doomed Neanderthal race is hopelessly outclasses by physically modern, culturally advanced "Others." Such portrayals could be labeled as accurate or inaccurate based on current findings. Whether or not these primitive peoples had belief systems was expressed in the film, which seems quite accurate. However, one must not forget about evolutionary theory and how it can affect the validity of these portrayals, as well as the few contemporary values put in the film. Neanderthals are now known to have primitive belief systems (Pringle 1998). They, according to archaeological evidence, buried their dead. In some graves, things such as flower petals, stone tools, and the like were found alongside the remains. Also, in some caves, small stone statuettes were in pieces in certain parts of the area around what seem to be remains of what used to be a fire, which could be evidence that they had spiritual ceremonies of some kind. These findings support the theory that the Neanderthals had a belief in an afterlife, supposedly animistic in nature as indicated by artifacts discovered by archaeologists. The evolutionary theory also greatly impacts the validity of the film. For example, an inaccuracy was found in the film, but was essential to the plot. The brain size of Neanderthals has shown that they weren't as smart as modern humans, and thus couldn't learn to count numbers. However, some parts of the film were accurate. Neanderthal peoples probably did have some sort of primitive language, or at least had the ability to make noises (Wilford 2003). The primitive people had a strict social hierarchy (Pringle 1998). Rare was a grave with a female body. And even when those were found, it was often alongside a


Bibliography: Wilford, John Noble. "Big Teeth in Ancient Jaw Offer Clues About Our Ancestors." New York Times. 30 September 2003 Pringle, Heather. "New Woman of the Ice Age." Discover April 1998; pages 62-69

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Postorbital ring 2. Dental comb 3. Tapetum Lucidum Tarsiers more like monkeys in their genetics Primate Fossil Ancestry: Events Preceding Primates Ca. 500 MYA: first vertebrates in fossil record Ca. 250 MYA: Pangea II forms- nearly all land is one big continent Ca.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What conclusion could you draw about Sumerian afterlife beliefs from the fact that the bones of other dead relatives were pushed into a corner to make way for new burials?…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lab Write Up

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The tooth formula is a shorthand technique that biologist use to keep track of the teeth on a particular jaw. The formula consisted of two lines, top jaw and bottom jaw, which were used to count how many incisors, canines, premolars, and molar teeth a species had. Species A, Odocoileus virginiaus (white-tailed deer), had a tooth formula of 0033/3133. On the top jaw, the deer had zero incisor and canine teeth but have three of both the premolars and molars. On the bottom jaw, the deer had three incisors, one canine, three premolars, and three molars. Species B, Canis latrans (coyote), had a tooth formula of 3142/3143. On the top jaw, the coyote had three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and two molars. On the bottom jaw, the coyote has three incisors, one canine, four premolars, and three molars. Both the deer and coyote skull were long and skinny towards the nose and mouth. The coyote skull had a much rounder nose than the deer. Species C, Homo sapiens (human), had a tooth formula of 2122/2122. On both the top and bottom jaws, there were two incisors, one canine, two premolars, and two molars. In comparison to the deer and coyote skull, the human was an outcast. The human skull was a short distance from the back of the skull to the front. The human skull was very different in bone structure and longer in height than the deer and coyote skulls.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is an ambitious project, and no reviewer can comment on all of it with equal authority. My own background as an historian of European expansion and Asian response over the last two hundred years requires me to take most of the account of prehistory on trust - which is a drawback since Diamond asserts that most of the really important influences on modern history had already occurred before the birth of Christ. To a non-specialist, the account of human prehistory presented here seems plausible and well-founded - the argument is that, as homo sapiens evolved in Africa and migrated to colonise first Asia, then Europe, then Australia, and finally the Americas, so a technical progression from hunting to settled agriculture, and a societal progression…

    • 2579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He brings in historical, proven examples of societies that have beaten out others for the pure reason of their environment and not their biological evolution. One example given by the author to support this idea is comparing Homo neanderthalensis and Cro-Magnons within part one of the book. Cro-Magnons are distant ancestors from where the anatomically modern Homo sapiens derived. Although it has been proven Homo neanderthalensis had a larger cranial capacity than modern humans, which correlates to a higher degree of intelligence, they however are the ones that are extinct. Diamond follows this line of thinking throughout the book, focusing on a multitude of different topics that could have affected the lives of past peoples.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When viewing Disney's A Bug's Life with the critical eye of an anthropologist, it is hard to truly believe that it is a children's movie. This movie is an introduction to the complex world of anthropology and it's concepts. One finds elements of culture in many different lights throughout this film. A Disney masterpiece shall be proven in this paper to not only intrigue the younger audience, but it shall verify the fact that the way humans function is so easily portrayed, even in the simplest behavioral patterns.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instructor: Dr. Joyce Parga; Email: j.parga@utoronto.ca Office hours: Tuesdays & Thursdays 3-4 pm (or by appointment); Office: MW 382 Lecture meeting times and location: Tuesdays 1-3 pm in SW 319 Tutorials (labs): 5 Tuesdays across the semester during your 1-hr tutorial section in MW 329 Tutorial TA: Dejana Nikitovic; Email: dejana.nikitovic@mail.utoronto.ca; Office: MW 343 (Note: Tutorials begin in Week 3 on Tuesday May 21. See Tutorial Schedule at end of syllabus.) Course Description: This course will provide a basic introduction to Evolutionary Anthropology and Archaeology, aimed at students with no background in either field. Prerequisites: None Exclusions: ANT100Y, ANT101H Required Readings: All chapters listed below in the lecture schedule refer to the following course textbook, which is available for purchase from the UTSC bookstore: Lewis, B., Jurmain, R., and Kilgore, L., 2012. Understanding Humans: Introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 11th edition. Belmont CA: Wadsworth. You can also purchase the text from the publisher as an e-book. Go to: http://www.nelsonbrain.com/shop/isbn/9781111831776 (On Blackboard, there is a PowerPoint file provided by the publisher about buying the e-book – look under “Course Materials”.) Lecture schedule: Following is a planned list of topics to be covered in lecture; note that topics are subject to change and all topics listed may not be covered, but you are responsible for doing all of the readings. Date 7 May 14 May 21 May Lecture Topic Course Intro /What is Anthropology/Evolution Genetics/Processes of Evolution Non-Human Primates/Primate Behaviour…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becoming Human Worksheet

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    larger Brains short heavy set Body hunters Food Source Why are the teeth of children particularly helpful in providing information about extinct hominids?…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your Inner Fish

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Your Inner Fish: A Review of Chapter 4 In Your Inner Fish, a book about the study of evolution in mammals, chapter four is dedicated to the study of teeth. Neil Shubin is explicit in his insistence that teeth are extremely important when studying evolution of the human body. He uses three main points to explain this to the reader. First, through the function of teeth. Then by revealing the anatomy of teeth. And finally by discussing tooth-to-tooth occlusion. Teeth are used to manipulate larger objects so that they may fit into a smaller mouth. Shubin writes ”Mouths are only so big, and teeth enable creatures to eat things that are bigger than their mouths” (Shubin 60). Without teeth creatures would have a smaller variety of options when it came to food choices. Bigger fish could only eat smaller fish and so on. As explained by Shubin “… teeth can be the great equalizer: smaller fish can munch on bigger fish if they have good teeth” (Shubin 60). So we derive from this that teeth can play an important role in the food chain and thus in evolution. However, teeth play a more important part than this. By studying the anatomy of teeth many secrets can be revealed about ancient reptiles and mammals. For instance, Shubin relates that “The bumps, pits and ridges on teeth often reflect the diet” (Shubin 60). By knowing the diet of an ancient creature, it is reasonable to see how a paleontologist and evolutionist can follow the emergence of the omnivore over the carnivore and herbivore. And the hardness of teeth make it the “best-preserved animal we find in the fossil record for many time periods” (Shubin 61). This clue to these ancient animal’s diets can “give us a good window on how different ways of feeding came about” (Shubin 61). So, the shape of the teeth and the general mineral make-up both contribute to the usefulness of teeth to the scientist.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCoid, C., McDermott, L. 1996. “Toward Decolonizing Gender: Female Vision in the Upper Paleolithic” New Series, Vol. 98, No.2, June, 319-326…

    • 1554 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Joseph Campbell’s Myths to Live By: Chapter One, he first describes a situation in which a young boy writes a scientific paper about the evolution of man. However, both the boy’s teacher and mother discredited the paper and claimed that man’s first parents were Adam and Eve. Campbell thought this was absurd--especially for a “twentieth century child!” (3).…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Yde Girl

    • 1356 Words
    • 4 Pages

    -Prag, John, and Richard Neave. Making Faces: Using Forensic and Archaeological Evidence. College Station: Texas A&M UP, 1997. 31/4/14…

    • 1356 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After 300,000 y.a. tools become more complex and are labeled in Europe as the Middle Paleolithic or in Africa, as the Middle Stone Age (Ambrose 2001). Regional variation is great enough that cultural traditions become evident. Tools composed of two or more materials that require complicated preparation become common and suggest increasingly complex brains. The tool tradition associated with the Neanderthals in western Europe is called the Mousterian (Klein 1999). All are eventually replaced by the blade industries of the Upper Paleolithic which are associated with modern humans. Encephalization, Language and Speech; brain sizes expressed as estimated cranial capacities are commonly reported for various species of hominin. Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus have the smallest averages to date at 410 and 440 cubic centimeters (cc.), respectively (Collard & Wood 1999). Chimpanzee cranial capacity also averages 410 cc. But chimpanzees weigh about 24% more than the australopiths, thus complicating this simple comparison. The cranial volume of the robust hominins such as P. robustus and P. boisei were in the 500’s and H. habilis, H. rudolfensis and H. ergaster averaged 610, 750, 850 cc.,…

    • 3142 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: 1.) Keith Maisels, Charles. Early Civilizations of the Old World. London and New York, 1999…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Veronica Harper was ready to let bygones be bygones. She'd spent enough years fighting tooth and claw to know that nobody won in a drag out brawl. It was better for all parties to come to the peace table. But being the leader of a Bear Shifter Clan meant many things, the most important of which was to be the kind of leader that the rest of the Clan would follow. That meant never losing face. Even if the person you're staring down is a handsome hunk with more charm than he realizes.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays