Claude And Roommate That's A Drug Dealer Case Summary
PART 1
Case 23, p.121
The parties involved are Claude and roommate that's a drug dealer. The moral issue is how Claude is a drug user who uses with no one knowing, but doesn't like that his roommate sells it. In this case we can see how Claude ethical reasoning played a role in his immoral action. Claude did not want to get caught doing something wrong based on the action of his roommate. He felt that his roommate was more ethically incorrect because he was actually selling it. He knew he was wrong , but minimized his wrongs and maximize his friend's. I would say Claude's intentions are a little cloudy because he wants to do the right thing but he is doing just as wrong. ( Raley & Burnor p.g. 215)
Case 9, pp. 130-131
The parties involved
Case 23, p.121
The parties involved are Claude and roommate that's a drug dealer. The moral issue is how Claude is a drug user who uses with no one knowing, but doesn't like that his roommate sells it. In this case we can see how Claude ethical reasoning played a role in his immoral action. Claude did not want to get caught doing something wrong based on the action of his roommate. He felt that his roommate was more ethically incorrect because he was actually selling it. He knew he was wrong , but minimized his wrongs and maximize his friend's. I would say Claude's intentions are a little cloudy because he wants to do the right thing but he is doing just as wrong. ( Raley & Burnor p.g. 215)
Case 9, pp. 130-131
The parties involved