Preview

Cooper V. Austin

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
864 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cooper V. Austin
Citation:
Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)
Parties:
* Phillip J. Cooper, Plaintiff – Appellant, Administrator * Charles Austin, Defendant – Appellant * Alois B. Greer, Proponent of the codicil
Facts:
* This is a will contest case involving a codicil to the Last Will and Testament of Wheelock A. Bisson, M.D., deceased. * Dr. Bisson's will, which is not contested, was executed June 18, 1982.
Prior Proceedings: * Dr. Bisson died in 1985, and shortly thereafter Greer filed a petition in probate court to admit the June 18, 1982, will and two codicils thereto dated August 20, 1984, and August 6, 1985, respectively, to probate as and for the Last Will and Testament of Wheelock A. Bisson, M.D. By order entered November 26, 1985, the probate court admitted the paper writings to probate as the Last Will and Testament of Dr. Bisson. * On May 20, 1986, Austin filed a petition in probate court to contest the two codicils, and, after answer to the petition by Greer, the probate court certified the contest to circuit court by order entered August 13, 1986. * No action was taken in circuit court until the administrator pendente lite filed a "Complaint to Establish Will and Codicil" on November 9, 1988. Austin's answer to the complaint, inter alia, denied that either codicil had been properly executed by the decedent or properly witnessed and further denied that the codicils had any legal validity or effect. * Greer filed a motion for summary judgment in October, 1990, seeking to have Austin's case dismissed on the grounds that it was barred by T.C.A. § 32-4-108 (1986), because it was brought more than two years from the entry of the order admitting the will to probate. The trial court denied this motion. * On March 26, 1991, a jury trial was held on the issue of devisavit vel non as to the 1984 codicil. The 1982 will was introduced into evidence by stipulation, and Greer offered the 1984 codicil

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    98 N.J. Super. 235, 236 A.2d 630, N.J. Super. Lexis 389 (1967) Superior court of New Jersey, Law Division…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nora Lindsay Case Study

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This evidence was found from from the formal approach the deceased took when writing the will and the support of the deceased’s intentions with a statement in 2008. This formal evidence included writing her name, address and date of birth at the top of the first page, by adopting language commonly used when writing wills such as ‘being of sound mind’ and ‘bequeath’ and also by signing the document. Further evidence of the deceased’s intentions was also supported by the fact that the deceased placed the document, along with other important documents, in an envelope that stated “this contains the Will of”. Furthermore, by the deceased informing the appellant of her will and intentions in 2008, Her Honour drew the conclusion that the deceased intended the document to take effect upon her death, finalizing her intentions for the document to form her…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. This first case I chose was Beard v. Hamilton, 512 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987).…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages

    ISSUE: Whether the will of the decedent McPeak was properly executed in accordance with the Florida law.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: The evening of May 4, 1982, Charma and Hugh Riddle were in their living room watching television. Mrs. Riddle proceeded to leave the room to go to the bathroom, but was surprised to find “respondent Cartwright” in the hallway with a shotgun in his hands (1). Charma Riddle fought with Cartwright for the gun, but Cartwright was able to shoot Mrs. Riddle twice in the legs. Apparently Mrs. Riddle was familiar with Cartwright as he was a “disgruntled ex-employee” of the couple (1). Cartwright then went on to the living room where Hugh Riddle was and shot and killed him. While Cartwright was tending to Mr. Riddle, Mrs.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    5. Procedural facts Plaintiff was convicted in the Fourth District Court in Dallas County, Texas of murder. The plaintiff then proceeded by appealing to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the previous judgment. The US Supreme Court reversed the decision of the original trial court and the Texas Court of Appeals.…

    • 380 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    227 Kan. 780; 610 P. 2d 580; 1980 Kan. LEXIS 280; 28 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1362…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Common law crimes are made by judges and statutory crimes are made by legislature. Most jurisdictions have moved away from common law to statutory crimes. Many crimes are both common law and statutory. Common-law crimes create problems…

    • 1491 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    of viability, more specifically the determination of when life begins. There are several issues that…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Robbins Collections School of Law University of California at Berkley. (n.d.). The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. Retrieved from http://www.berkley.edu…

    • 1862 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus, and the War on Terror have all played a role throughout history. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power in the absence of the rule of law. The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States since terrorists are apprehended and deprived of due process. Habeas corpus is considered to be one of the most fundamental guarantees of personal liberty that we cherished as a country since the inception of our Constitution. However, debates have arisen regarding the proper use of habeas corpus making the focus be brought back in the past decade. Since September 11, 2001 terrorist attack on the United States, many people have been detained by the U.S. government as part of its war on terror. Many of these detainees face indefinite detention and have not yet been charged with a crime. The right of Habeas corpus overrules man’s interpretation and allows those accused federal and state court representation before a judge, or jury. The accusers deemed innocent until proven guilty, they have the right to representation, and appear in person for the charges brought forth. The purpose of this paper is to show how Habeas corpus came about, and its suspension by the United States. Also, the war on terror will be addressed along with the Supreme Court’s interpretation. Learning the history of Habeas corpus and how it works, allows us to see just how these laws are supposed to be carried out from our Constitution and not to be reconciled with.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An ex post facto law is a law that is retroactive; after the fact. It is a law that retroactively changes an offender’s rights by criminalizing and imposing punishment for an act that was not punishable at the time the offender committed it. Or, it can be the raising the punishment for a crime after the crime is committed. It generally punishes conduct that was lawful when it was done but later becomes unlawful or increases the punishment (Ex Post Facto Law, n.d.).…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cruzan V Missouri Case Edited

    • 27979 Words
    • 112 Pages

    CRUZAN, BY HER PARENTS AND CO-GUARDIANS, CRUZAN ET UX. v. DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, ET AL.…

    • 27979 Words
    • 112 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What does freedom of expression really mean? Why is it important to our democratic society? In the landmark case of R. v. Keegstra (1990), the issues of freedom of expression and hate speech is brought in front of the Supreme Court of Canada. The case also deals with issues of whether sections 319(2) and 319(3)(a) of the Criminal Code violated section 2(b) and section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The courts view that the objectives of having freedom of speech are correlated with democracy in the sense that for members of society to have their voices heard, they must be free to speak on matters that provide value back to society. This case has served as precedence for other freedom of expression cases. R. v. Keegstra can be looked at through many of the legal principles, but for the purposes of this essay, I will focus on the Offense Principle. This principle, brought forward by Joel Feinberg, is a tangent of John Mill’s Harm Principle, which deals with non-physical harm, such as hate speech. This is evident when looking at R. v. Keegstra, as the Offense Principle is the best principle to articulate why the dissenting judges ruled the way they did. I believe that the lead dissenting judge, Beverly McLachlin, ruled accurately in her judgement and I intend to support this ruling throughout this essay. As well, I will provide a summery of R. V. Keegstra, look at Philosophical principles as…

    • 2805 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This case has a similar background to those of the assignment. The original action is based in 1962 in the city of Jackson, Mississippi. In that lawsuit, Clark v. Thompson, 206 F. Supp. 539 (SD Miss. 1962), the…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays