Clergy Of Brahmanbaria By Stephen Bannon Summary

Stephen Bannon’s Judeo-Christian ideals and the Clergy of Brahmanbaria’s conservation of Islamic Values may seem to be two entities from opposite sides of the political religious spectrum. But, with a closer analysis of their ideals, they both have something in common. Both seem to have a fear of globalization on a socioeconomic level. Changes to the world’s economy and changes to the local social structure are the two main threats to the future of their beliefs. On the Judeo-Christian side, Bannon is a highly educated ex-Goldman Sachs employee that believes that the underpinnings of one’s religion should drive the work that they produce. Of course, he believes that the faith with the most coherent and righteous values is the Judeo-Christian West.
Overall, he claims that there is a crisis in his church, in his faith, of the west, and in his capitalism. On the other hand, the clergy in Bangladesh are deeply rooted in the sociopolitical power of rural areas. They set the social laws that every citizen has to abide to in order to preserve the ideals of Islam. The most important threat to the preservation of their ideals is the NGO and the progression of women’s rights in their community. The ideals of the Proshika (NGO) align directly against the established rules of the clergy. It appears that the Clergy will do whatever’s possible to try and stop any form of NGO practices in their community. Although the NGO practices aren’t entirely without fault, these extreme measures of physical assault and public shaming are very inhumane and clash with the trajectory of cultural