Preview

Come And Get Me You Fairies ! By Kathy Shaidle

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
629 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Come And Get Me You Fairies ! By Kathy Shaidle
Constitutionally Protected Speech- Speech under the law can apply to almost any form of expression ranging from verbal communication to writings and pictures to expressive conduct. Constitutionally protected speech is becoming more of a problem. Come and Get Me You Fairies! by Kathy Shaidle, an article with no restrictions on the effects of “hate speech” laws. Shaidle focuses on an idea for a Liberal bill that is set to take legal action for “anti-transgender speech” that could lead to up to two years in a federal prison. She claims that it is unjust for someone to be imprisoned for words. Shaidle points out that oppressive interruptions into an assumed democratic country are not exclusive to Canada. Quoted from her work “bear in mind that …show more content…
Are there things in this world that deserve hate? Is it wrong to show hatred toward a racial supremacy ideal such as Nazism or a communist government? Would it be wrong to hate leaders like Stalin, Hitler, or people who made an attempt at genocide? Do we enjoy making excuses for people who destroy buildings and murder thousands of citizens just doing their daily routines? When we study common trends, which are based on undeniable misstatement, like the climate change issue or the infectious of shift claims of rape in a feminist culture or the political awareness of the school system as appeared in the Germany Infiltration system of the 1930s, is this not “a time to speak.” If we are bothered by the united attack on biological matter that leads to absurd physical catastrophe and civil action that benefit abuse of the common order while characterizing the doubtful and, as Robert Reilly of catholic world report argues definitely, advocating “the substitution of pure will as the means for unshackling us from what we are as given,” should we not be able to speak our anger through words or reveal our faith, yet illogical? If we oppose to the “slaughter of the innocents," otherwise pro-choice

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is the major question that arises. I believe that everyone knows that speech is protected under the…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The court said that the First Amendment Rule applies as a defense against the state tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. This precedent was set in the Hustler Magazine Inc. v. Falwell. The court needed to decide whether or not the speech was of public concern. Speech of public concern is entitled to special protection under the First Amendment and is on the highest rung of protection. This is to ensure that public debate and self expression are preserved and remain "uninhibited, robust, and wide-open." When an issue is of private matters then it is given much less protection. It is true that it is difficult to define exactly what public concern is. It has been covered in a broad term that can be narrowed down in individual circumstances. For speech to be defined as public concern it must "be fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community." It also can be defined as when the speech "is a subject of legitimate news interest; that is, a subject of general interest and of value and concern to the public." All factors of the speech must be determined and reviewed before a decision is made. The court must consider the content, form, and context of the speech. This includes examining what was said and how it was said. This is to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis because of the varying nature and severity of speech. Once all aspects are covered, the court can determine if the speech meets the criteria for public or private…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hudgens V Labar Case Study

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Our constitution gives us the right under the First Amendment to the Freedom of Speech. This seems like a fairly straight forward right, but what many don’t know is that the Constitution only guarantees our right to freedom of speech against abridgement by government, federal or state. (Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 Lexis).…

    • 2468 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vacco Vs Quill Case Study

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages

    While the Church exhorts civil authorities to seek peace, not war, and to exercise discretion and mercy in imposing punishment on criminals, it may still be permissible to take up arms to repel an aggressor or to have recourse to capital punishment. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia."…

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States prides itself on the freedoms that are afforded to each of its citizens. Among those freedoms is the first amendment freedom of speech. However, that freedom is often called into question. For instance, the Snyder v. Phelps case. In the Snyder v. Phelps case, Albert Snyder who is the father of Matthew A. Snyder, argues how the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) picketed his son’s funeral asserting offensive statements due to his Albert Snyder’s homosexuality. Moreover, Snyder filed a lawsuit against the WBC “for defamation, intrusion, upon seclusion, infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy” (“Snyder v. Phelps” Wikipedia). The speech discussed in the Snyder v. Phelps case deserves the protection of the first amendment.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    constitution gives us the freedom of speech expressed by the first amendment. The first amendment gives us the liberty to express our own opinion about something. It also gives us a sort of independence by letting us speak freely instead of following someone else opinion because anything else would of been considered illegal. For example, before the colonists immigrated to America, England and there they were required to have a certain religion set by the King. Every person was required to be either protestant or catholic depending on the King’s preference. The colonists grew tired when the king changed it so many times and they wanted to have their own religion so they moved to…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Owls by Mary Oliver

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The great-horned owl is one of the most mysterious animals of the world. In an excerpt from Mary Oliver's essay "Owls," she discusses her fear as well as her utmost admiration of this most frightening of creatures.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the narrow basis for the constitutionality of legislation restricting hate speech, Rothstein J. held that additional language of the Saskatchewan Code extending to expression that "ridicules, belittles or otherwise affronts the dignity" of persons on the basis of a prohibited ground was not justified under s. 1 of the Charter, and thus of no force and…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects five fundamental freedoms: religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. These freedoms collectively form the bedrock of individual liberty, creating an environment where citizens can express themselves, participate in civic life, and hold their government accountable. Freedom of religion ensures that individuals have the right to practice their faith or choose not to, without interference from the government. Freedom of speech guarantees the right to express opinions and ideas, even those that may be unpopular or controversial; this freedom extends beyond mere verbal expression to encompass artistic, symbolic, and symbolic…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In other countries it seems as though they have less tolerance for this type of targeted hatred as well as for people who use their “free speech” rights as a self-defense to cause harm or humiliation to others. In Canada, they outlaw any representation of hatred against any group’s beliefs and in Britain they prohibit any derogatory or abusive language against another person or group that would stir up hatred. I believe that the U.S. government should be less tolerable of these types of offenses and place stricter laws limiting freedom of speech if it causes anyone else…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, patriated in 1982, is arguably the most fundamental base of law that exists in Canada. Section 2 of the Charter, also known as the Fundamental Freedoms, is a crucial part of the Charter because it protects citizens and gives them the freedom to follow and practice their own religion, have their own beliefs and opinions, express themselves as they wish and gather in peaceful assemblies (Jobb). Section 2(b) of the Charter, also known as the “freedom of expression”, states that Canadians have the “freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication” (Class Note, Al-Hassani, 10/10/2014). This freedom is crucial in a democratic society because…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hate is everywhere. It always has been, from the beginning of time. When the cavemen started forming intense dislikes for one another over the last coconut to present day, when suicide bombers take their own and the lives of innocent people to express their hate. And somewhere in between those two occurrences, are hundreds and thousands of additional incidents that sprung from hate toward a concept, system or person. Prejudice, racism segregation, war, murder, genocide; they all develop from a person’s mind: their thoughts and feelings. One of the most commonly known acts of hate is genocide, the Holocaust, to be specific. The Holocaust was an…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the First Amendment has such strong language, we begin with the presumption that speech is protected. Over the years, the courts have decided that a few other public interests — for example, national security, justice or personal safety — override freedom of speech. There are no simple rules for determining when speech should be limited, but there are some general tests that help.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays