Preview

Common Law assignment 1

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3053 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Common Law assignment 1
The source of English Law is broad, with the real starting point at the Norman Conquest in 1066. During that time, England was mostly ruled by customs prior to the Conquest. It wasn’t until William the Conqueror took throne that modern English law started to develop, under the common law. Fast forward to 21st century, and now the law has been a lot more developed, with its sources divided into two, the primary source and the secondary source. The primary source being case law, legislation, and European law. In the case of secondary source, it comes from law journals, textbooks, and parliamentary and non-parliamentary documents. The contents of this assignment will then be divided in examining these two sources, and how it ultimately becomes the pillars for what English law as it is today and beyond. First and foremost, case law, or to be more precise for this discussion, common law, is ‘…law developed by judges through cases…’1, this means that English law is made through the cases which is dealt by previous judges, and makes future judges be bound by it. Thus the term of “stare decisis” comes in, whereby it means in accordance to Professor Gall “to stand by decisions and not to disturb settled manners”2. This latin describes what the English common law is all about, being that judges is bound by the previous judges’ decisions. Upon discussing the term of stare decisis in common law, it is then needs to be discussed on the matters of its advantages and disadvantages. The disadvantages of the doctrine of stare decisis itself is that it will cause injustice. This is due to the fact that courts needs to be in line with previous cases on how to deal with their current respective cases, which leads to undesirable treatment to the respective claimants simply because it is a binding case that laid down an unjust rule. Of course, today’s modern system of the English Legal System (ELS) do have mechanisms in order to avoid this, but this wasn’t exactly


Bibliography: Books Slapper G & David Kelly, The English Legal System 2013-2014 (14th edition, Routledge, 2013) Huxley-Binns R & Martin Jacqueline, Unlocking English Legal System (3rd edition, Routledge, 2010) Martin Jacqueline, The English Legal System (6th edition, Hodder Education, 2010) George M & Arasu K, Common Law Reasoning Study Manual LL.B (1st edition, Brickfields Asia Corporation, 2013) Electronic Sources Earl of Oxford’s Case [1616] 1 Rep Ch 1 T v UK; V v UK (1999) 7 BHRC 659, ECHR

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    TMA 1 W200

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are four main sources of law in England and Wales are legislation, judge-made law and European Union (EU) law and human rights law. This essay will look at the difference sources of English law (as highlighted above) and explain the relative importance of each source with particular reference to case law, and conclude whether the view articulated by your friend is correct.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The precedent of “Stare Decisis” was adopted in the State vs. Pendergrass. Stare Decisis means stand by what has been decided. An analogy that was used to create precedent in the first place would have been the protection of established authority or the maintenance of hierarchical relationships. The way this precedent was brought about was the idea that children needed to be disciplined if necessary.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week1 Busn 420

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the heart of the common law system is the doctrine of stare decisis, which translates to “let the decision stand.” Stare decisis creates precedent and thus, when a court has decided a case in a particular way, future cases should be decided the same way. However, stare decisis will only apply if the facts of the case are substantially similar to the prior case. Precedent acts as a major guide for judges when hearing similar cases.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    BUSINESS LAW QUESTIONS

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1-5. What does stare decisis mean, and why has this doctrine been so fundamental to the development of our legal tradition?…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Common Law Assignment

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue is it’s unclear whether Jessie is making an offer to sell or an offer simply as a gift as they have been friends for 15 years. In order to determine if a valid offer has been made application of the objective test would be applied1. Would a reasonable person in these circumstances believe there to be a valid offer and what is the relative importance of the statement to each party2? Jessie’s statement made to Ian that he is happy to ‘let go’ of his car with the wording he has used has the potential to make the situation somewhat ambiguous, Jessie’s true intentions are unclear. The statement is not definite and lacks sufficient finality for the statement to be classed as an offer3. Although his wording is uncertain the courts will also look at what context the statement was made and because Ian did state he wanted to ‘buy’ a car for his daughter then the statement can be argued both ways. Jessie then invited Ian to his home to look at the car although there is still no conversation about the sale of the car. This offer doesn’t have terms that are clear and final and therefore the requirement of a valid offer has not been satisfied.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stare decisis means that a lower court cannot ignore binding precedent however it is not limited to precedent without considering the context of the case at hand. Secondly, The Supreme Court of Canada clarified that in determining whether a law causes violation of section 7 two points should be considered causation and principles of fundamental justice. The Supreme Court of Canada rejected the argument that there is insufficient causal relationship between the provisions and the safety risks faced by…

    • 2666 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. What 2 factors do most judges use when deciding a case? What does stare decisis mean?…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stare decisis is a doctrine obligating judges to help persons who have failed to protect their own rights.…

    • 2274 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Stare Decisis Case Summary

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stare decisis is important in that it “preserves respect for the rule of law and appropriately cabins judicial discretion” (Constitutional Law Professors, 5). According to the Supreme Court, this doctrine of precedent:…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    | Incorrect. The use of precedent--the doctrine of stare decisis --permits a predictable, relatively quick, and fair resolution of cases. Under this doctrine, a court must adhere to principles of law established by higher courts.…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Creation of U.S. Laws

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thorpe, M. (2012). U.S. Law and the History of English Common Law. Retrieved from http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/CommonLaw.htm…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mexico Ethical Dilemmas

    • 4995 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Because of the concept of stare decisis, the U. S. Supreme Court, in interpreting a statute in 2009, will necessarily interpret certain statutory language in the same way as the U. S. Supreme Court interpreted the same statutory language in 1971.…

    • 4995 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    An important point to keep in mind is that all binding decisions are initiated at the highest court at either the federal or state level. These decisions are precedent only in the jurisdiction where the court presides. Stare decisis refers to the practice of the courts adhering to previously rendered decisions. This is especially true involving United States Supreme Court decisions that have binding authority on both the federal and the state courts. Remember that court decisions in the same jurisdiction only have persuasive authority which is not binding.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chapter: 4 Encountering Law is Common Law System; Principles of Legal Research and Reading the Law (p37)…

    • 2659 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nsl Final Exam Study Guide

    • 7447 Words
    • 30 Pages

    a. Stare Decisis. Stare Decisis can influence judge’s decisions because they will defer to prior Supreme Court decisions and apply the precedent to their current cases and rule based on the past decisions.…

    • 7447 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics