Introduction
I. Attention grabber: How would you react if everything you and your family had worked diligently for was taken in a single night? Use 2-spaces between sentences Furthermore, how would you react if you were told that this all could have been avoided if you had communicated more effectively with a locksmith a few days prior to the event? Would you look back to the event and analyze the conversation in order to understand what exactly went wrong? – Good opening series of rhetorical questions. Can you draft them a bit more concisely, so that they are only 2-3 lines? II. Establishing Ethos: The people in this group have watched the film Crash (year), and carefully examined the scene where the locksmith speaks with the store owner about the need for him to buy a new door. We have also studied several communication principles as defined by Beebe Beebe and Ivy (year) in the Communications textbook and related these principles back to the movie scene. You’ve got the right idea here. Again, just be more concise and direct with the wording. III. Central Idea: The central idea of this essay is that The members of the group have concluded that the Character A and Character B showed ineffective communication habits in their scene. two characters miscommunicated due to poor communication skills from both characters. (In this essay, we will analyze different aspects of the dialogue in order to explain how and why these characters failed to communicate effectively.) – This second sentence here is a Specific Purpose Statement. IV. Preview: This analysis will cover the communication competence level of the two characters, the model of communication in the scene, the communication characteristics, the role of self-awareness, the power of words, the role of nonverbal communication, listening styles, and elements of culture. Good preview! V.