First, Company Q should have performed a thorough evaluation to find the root cause of the consistent loss of profits in the 2 stores they closed in higher crime-rate areas. They would have likely found that the products that they were offering in all stores simply did not sell well in all of the stores due to the varying demographics. Catering product offerings is vital to ensure sustainability and growth. If Company Q offered organic vegetables and cage free eggs in an area that is typically classified as lower income, they would probably have a hard time selling those products. However, if Company Q stocked low-cost food items and affordable goods that were catered towards the demographic of their customer, they would probably turn a profit. Diversification across Company Q’s various stores will definitely take more effort, but the outcome could relate to more jobs for their employees, more customers, and more growth for the …show more content…
Company Q’s refusal to donate products to the food bank due to potential theft brings light to an even larger problem. A good fraud, waste, and abuse program is an important foundation in any company’s ethical code of conduct. If a small team of company employees was created, they would be able to find the instances in which there may be fraud or abuse with food bank donations. It’s absolutely irresponsible to throw items away that could go to needy due to a fear of theft by internal employees. Food banks rely on donations from grocery stores to help feed the less fortunate. Other grocery stores participate in this practice and have obviously found a way to donate successfully without theft, and with some thoughtful controls put in place, Company Q could do the