Preview

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
858 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems The goal of socialism is to minimize people’s suffering through public control of industry and social services; socialism rejects class-based society (TheFreeDictionary, 2010). Socialism promises prosperity, equality, and security to the people. However, in many cases socialism has brought poverty, misery, and tyranny to the people; equality is achieved in the sense that everyone is equal in misery (Perry, 1995, June). Key characteristics of the socialist system in Sweden and Russia are described in this paper, and advantages and disadvantages of the system are discussed. In 1917 the Russian Revolution overthrew the czarist regime that ruled the Russian Empire. The new leaders created the Soviet Union and attempted to establish a socialist state based on the writings of Karl Marx. However, Marx did not explain how the socialist system would function. Without a blueprint for establishing the socialist system, the leaders of the new regime of Russia struggled to invent one. Under its socialist system, the government of Russia declared its ownership of most businesses and forced peasants to turn over a share of their output to the government. This “war communism” allowed the government to take control of production and distribution of goods (Rittenberg & Tregarthen, 2009, April). The new government replaced elected officials with its own, “took over” land, banks, insurance companies, and large factories. The new regime destroyed the pre-revolutionary legal structure of the Russian economy. The program of “war communism” devastated the economy and the people lived in poverty, tyranny, and misery. In 1921 Soviet communist leader Vladimir Lenin restored the legal basis necessary for the Russian economy to function, and he ordered that the government draft and enact a civil code based on western European civil law (Maggs, 2010). Russia and Sweden are socialist countries governed by European civil law. Socialism is an economic


References: Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2009, February). Active labor market policy evaluations: a meta- analysis Cooper, R. (2009, April 23). Jon Stewart: socialism is awesome. Retrieved on September 8, 2010 from the Website http://blog.heritage.org/2009/04/23/jon-stewart-socialism-is- awesome/. Free, R. (1995). Economics. Retrieved on September 7, 2010 from the Website http://graphcomp.com/home/bfree/opinions/economy.html. Maggs, P. (2010). Soviet law. Retrieved on September 9, 2010 from the Website http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/557116/Soviet-law. Perry M., (1995, June). Why socialism failed. Retrieved on September 7, 2010 from the Website http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/why-socialims-failed/#. Rittenberg, L. & Tregarthen, T. (2009, April). Principles of microeconomics. Retrieved on September 7, 2010 from the Website http://www.flatworldknowledge.com
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lenin had a greater impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other Ruler. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?
    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Lenin had a greater impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other Ruler. How far do you agree with this view of the period from 1855 to 1964?

    Over the period from 1855 to 1964, Russia saw various reforms and policies under the Tsars and the Communist leaders that had great impacts on its economy and society both positive and negative. Lenin definitely implanted polices that changed society and the economy for example with war communism. However whether his policies had the greatest impact is debatable and in this essay I will be assessing the view whether Lenin had the greatest impact on Russia’s economy and society than any other ruler between the period from 1855-1964.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    To What Extent Do You Consider the Emancipation of Serfs 1861 to Be a Key Turning Point in the Development of Russian Government and Society Till 2000?
    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To What Extent Do You Consider the Emancipation of Serfs 1861 to Be a Key Turning Point in the Development of Russian Government and Society Till 2000?

    Many historians argue The Emancipation of the Serfs in 1861, to be a key turning point within Russian history. It drastically altered Russia’s economic, political and social stipulation. One could propose the argument that this event lead to the fall of communism in 1990, further more suggesting the extent to which this event affected Russia. Hence this is ‘perhaps the most defining moment in Russian history, with its impact being seen many years after the event itself’. Although historians identify short term effects of this event, the significance to which this event developed Russian government and society up to the 21st century has been so tremendous that they cannot be disregarded. However when one considers the argument of the likes of Louis Hobart who suggests the event was only a contributing element to ‘the social and economic transformation’ it must be asked to what extent was this event alone a key turning point in the development of Russian Government?…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Commerce Study Notes Year 9
    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Commerce Study Notes Year 9

    * Socialism: Ownership of all production (farms and factories) controlled by the people. Government puts responsibility on people. E.G. Sweden…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Eastern European Socialism
    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Eastern European Socialism

    Western Democratic Socialism demonstrates to the world what a feasible, arguably successful form of socialism looks like. Conversely, the economic, political, and social challenges of Eastern European Socialism eventually led to the collapse of the Soviet Union under Gorbachev, demonstrating a form of socialism that proved incapable of being maintained. Some would say that the USSR was not an impactful form of socialism because it did not last into the 21st century. However, you cannot judge the impact of socialism based on how long that it lasted; instead, judgment of the impact can be based on what was accomplished while this form of socialism existed. In the time that the Soviet Union existed, the USSR was able to implement socialism and major changes were made. These two poles of socialism have sparked a debate about the advantages of socialism, as well as its possible obsolescence or viability. Due to this discussion, they are the most impactful forms of…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Of mice and men & An inspector calls
    • 5703 Words
    • 23 Pages

    Of mice and men & An inspector calls

    “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery”- Winston Churchill…

    • 5703 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    TypesofCapitalism
    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page

    TypesofCapitalism

    Sweden: Social capitalism: combination of free market economy and welfare state, governments regulate markets/provide social support for the poor, means of production are social and intellectual as well as tangible (Fulcher, 2004).…

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Transformation of Russia (2/14/13)
    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Transformation of Russia (2/14/13)

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How did Lenin consolidate power after 1
    • 7842 Words
    • 20 Pages

    How did Lenin consolidate power after 1

    Throughout 1917 Lenin promised the people of Russia ‘Peace, Land and Bread’. Almost immediately after coming power, Lenin signed the ‘Decree on Land’ which abolished private property and distributed the land among the peasants. At the same time, the ‘Decree on Peace’ stated Lenin’s intention for Russia to withdraw from WWI and seek a peace settlement with Germany. Lenin was aware that it was the Provisional Government’s unwillingness or inability to act on questions of land and peace that contributed to its unpopularity and allowed the Bolsheviks to take power so easily in October. Although the Bolsheviks had difficulty enforcing land reform, due in part to its limited presence in the countryside, and the fact that a number of Bolshevik leaders were not willing to capitulate to Germany, the decrees issued by the new Bolshevik government were a sign of Lenin’s awareness of the urgency of at least partially carrying out these promises.…

    • 7842 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Socialism -vs- Capitalism
    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socialism -vs- Capitalism

    Socialism vs. Capitalism Samantha Conti University of Phoenix Comm. /105 –January 12, 2008 The disadvantages of Communism are that people have to be willing to work for the greater good of society, not just themselves. They will not receive all the fruits of their labor, no matter hoe much you work you will always get the same salary. Why would you want to work so hard if you were going to make the same amount of money? Human rights abuses, lack of incentives for progress for individuals which results in a slow progressing society as a whole. Under Socialist theory the individual’s needs are determined and satisfied collectively. Dissent and venturing out on one’s own are not option. Everyone is an employee and tenant of the state. In Communism people have little rights, everything is run by the government resulting in enormous economic failures, including famine, militarism and propaganda to cover-up the systematic failures of the government. Capitalism was developed in Europe in the 19th and early 20th century. Capitalism is an economic arrangement in which people have the individual liberty and the right to own property and to do what they wish with their property as long as it does not harm anyone else. These freedoms set Capitalism apart from all other kinds of economic arrangements. The Capitalist system is based in giving each individual the freedom to better (or worse him or herself). Capitalism signifies means of production. The heart of Capitalism is the producer’s right to make what he wants and the consumer’s right to choose what to buy. A free market economy and free enterprise. The major benefit of Capitalism is private property, the concept that people have the right and privilege to control their possessions as they wish. In a Capitalism economy the role of the government reflect the desire and goals of its citizens. Capitalism societies suffer from poverty too, but in a different way as there is a vastly unequal distribution of wealth (a few…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Was A Turning Point In The Russian Revolution
    • 3563 Words
    • 15 Pages

    What Was A Turning Point In The Russian Revolution

    The Russian revolution of 1917 saw the overthrow of the tsarist autocracy in February and the seizure of power by the Bolshevik party in October.The Bolsheviks proceeded to establish the world’s first Communist state on a territory covering one-sixth of the globe. A series of events and ideas led to the October revolution, each significant in its own capacity.…

    • 3563 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    American Exceptionalism: The American Dream
    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    American Exceptionalism: The American Dream

    Whereas Socialism, according to the Marxists Theory, is something in-between Capitalism and Communism; A political and economic ideology where the government has almost complete control over trade, capital, land, and the production and distribution of goods. Thus encouraging the formation of a welfare state. In countries such as Cuba and other countries who employ Socialistic practices land is completely owned by the government, unlike America, where the majority of land is privately owned by the individuals of America. While some people will argue that capitalism is all about greed and has caused the inequality that is so frequently spoke of by politicians, protesters, and news and media outlets. Many think the solution to this inequality is to employ more Socialistic ideals, what some refer to as Marxism 2.0; however, as Socialism is European countries is proving, that is not the…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Economic Systems
    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Economic Systems

    This economic system had numerous features, both good and bad. Following the end of czarist rule, Vladimir Lenin, and later Joseph Stalin, came into power as leader of the Bolsheviks, or the Communists, those who deeply desired communist ideas for a government. Vladimir Lenin and his Communist Party established the Soviet Union, which by Joseph Stalin, was made into a communist and totalitarian state, which is ruled by one dictator. A factor of communism in Russia set by Stalin was the Great Purge. During this enforcement, those who resisted the government, going against their ideals, were executed or exiled from society. If any were even accused of opposition towards the government, they would be brutalized, murdered or removed from their country. This action sparked great fear in the people of the Soviet Union, as they were forced to be harshly subordinate to Stalin.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The impact of War Communism and the New Economic Policy (NEP) on both the peasantry and proletariat in Russian society between 1918 and 1928.
    • 1111 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The impact of War Communism and the New Economic Policy (NEP) on both the peasantry and proletariat in Russian society between 1918 and 1928.

    War communism was implemented as a result of the civil war. Historians such as Maurice Dobb, E. H. Carr, and Stephen Cohen -- have interpreted war communism as a short-term expedient imposed on the Bolsheviks by the emergency demands of civil war and foreign intervention. According to this version, the system was never intended to last into normal peacetime conditions and had no special ideological significance. While this has since become "the standard account," several well-informed economists writing in the 1920s, such as Boris Brutzkus and Leo Pasvolsky, viewed war communism in a much more ideological light -- as an attempt to realise Marx' anti-market socialist or communist utopia. The features of war communism were that peasant land was seized and then nationalised, however the peasant's control. As insufficient grain was reaching the cities the government introduced grain requisition, excess food was seized with Cheka support, it couldn't be sold for a profit. Large scale businesses were nationalised without compensation; this was extended to all business with more than ten people by 1918. All private trade was abolished, and the government controlled food with ration cards and workers were paid through food rations. Workers were told when and where to work, often working up to ten hours a day, and strikes became illegal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Imperialism as the Highest Stage of Capitalism and Modern Global Economy
    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Imperialism as the Highest Stage of Capitalism and Modern Global Economy

    Probably no other country in the world has gone through more complex and radical changes in its history over the last 100 years than the Russian Federation. In the last century this vast and diverse territory went from being an empire to being the main part of the Soviet Union, to being a liberal democracy. One of the key characters of the early developments was Vladimir Lenin. Born in 1870 in Simbirsk, he became involved in left politics already as a young adult, and even had to live in exile in different parts of Europe during the last 20 years of the Romanov Empire. He came back to Russia after the February Revolution in 1917, and after the October Revolution, he became the leader of the new founded SFSR and the prime minister of the Soviet Union from 1922 until he died in 1924. The essay analyzed in this document, “Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism”, was written during his exile in Zürich in 1916. Imperialism is the creation and maintenance of a country's power and influence through military force. Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of capital goods and the means of production, with the creation of goods and services for profit. The problematic discussed in Lenin’s essay is about the damage that imperialism does to the economy, inspired of the events happening at that time, the First World War. In this work, in a first part, Lenin’s essay will be analyzed in more detail and in a second part it will be compared and put in relation to the modern global economy.…

    • 2065 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    SEQ Lenin S Economic Policy
    • 917 Words
    • 3 Pages

    SEQ Lenin S Economic Policy

    War communism was the name given to the name of the harsh economic measure the Bolsheviks adopted during the civil war. The aims was to put Communism theories into practice by redistributing wealth among the Russian people as well as help with the Civil War by keeping the towns and the Red Army supplied with food and weapons. This policy had both negative and positive impacts.…

    • 917 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics