Comparative Methodological Critique
Comparative Methodological Critique
Introduction
The aim of this paper is to compare two academic research papers, one informed by qualitative and another one by quantitative research designs with focus on the methodological factors. Both papers describe working lives and attitudes of gay and lesbian workers in the UK and USA, possible consequences of disclosure of sexual orientation on their working relations and organisational arrangements towards equality and diversity of working practice. These research projects add to the growing number of studies which shed light on the sensitive nature of homosexuality in the workplace and anti-discrimination policies and practices that organisations deploy to create a more inclusive working environment. Governed by the difficulty of access to gay and lesbian population both in UK and USA, and its “hidden” nature both teams chose their own strategy in unveiling the nature of work attitudes of gay and lesbian employees and demonstrating the progress organisations have made or are making towards the establishment of good practice.
1st paper (qualitative)
The paper deals with identifying good organisational practice concerning equality, diversity and sexual orientation in the workplace, and considers any changes following the introduction of Employment equality (Sexual Orientation) regulations 2003. It also aims at addressing the gap between equality policy and practice which provides the foundation for further analysis of the significant shortfall in knowledge relating to the experience of LGB (lesbian, gay and bisexual) employees in UK organisations.
Even today, the issue of sexuality still remains a sensitive one, despite the coming into force of legislation offering protection to LGB people. It is also the cause of unease for some employers in the modern world in discussing (not to mention dealing with!) this issue, and consequential bullying, suffering and fear which make life and work unbearable for so many LGB
Introduction
The aim of this paper is to compare two academic research papers, one informed by qualitative and another one by quantitative research designs with focus on the methodological factors. Both papers describe working lives and attitudes of gay and lesbian workers in the UK and USA, possible consequences of disclosure of sexual orientation on their working relations and organisational arrangements towards equality and diversity of working practice. These research projects add to the growing number of studies which shed light on the sensitive nature of homosexuality in the workplace and anti-discrimination policies and practices that organisations deploy to create a more inclusive working environment. Governed by the difficulty of access to gay and lesbian population both in UK and USA, and its “hidden” nature both teams chose their own strategy in unveiling the nature of work attitudes of gay and lesbian employees and demonstrating the progress organisations have made or are making towards the establishment of good practice.
1st paper (qualitative)
The paper deals with identifying good organisational practice concerning equality, diversity and sexual orientation in the workplace, and considers any changes following the introduction of Employment equality (Sexual Orientation) regulations 2003. It also aims at addressing the gap between equality policy and practice which provides the foundation for further analysis of the significant shortfall in knowledge relating to the experience of LGB (lesbian, gay and bisexual) employees in UK organisations.
Even today, the issue of sexuality still remains a sensitive one, despite the coming into force of legislation offering protection to LGB people. It is also the cause of unease for some employers in the modern world in discussing (not to mention dealing with!) this issue, and consequential bullying, suffering and fear which make life and work unbearable for so many LGB
References: Anderson, V. (2009) Research methods in human resource management. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007) Business research methods. Oxford University press. Colgan, F., Creegan, C., McKearney, A. and Wright, T. (2007) Equality and diversity policies and practices at work: lesbian, gay and bisexual workers. Equal Opportunities International 26 (3): 590-609. Day, N.E. and Schoenrade, P. (2000) The relationship among reported disclosure of sexual orientation, anti-discrimin¬ation policies, top management support and work attitudes of gay and lesbian employees. Personnel Review 29 (3): 346-363. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Jackson, Paul R. (2008) Management Research. Sage Publications Ltd. Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A. and Swartz, E. (1998) Doing Research in Business and Management: an Introduction to Process and Method. London: Sage. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2003) Research methods for business students. Pearson Education Ltd.