According to Walter E. Requadt (2005) The Laocoon Group is a depiction of the death of Laocoon and his sons as punishment for Laocoon 's advice to the Trojans not to bring the Trojan horse within the walls of their city. The serpents unite the three figures, drawing you from one figure to the next. Every inch of Laocoon 's face depicts his pain: From his wrinkled forehead to half shut eyes and parted lips, the figure cries out in pain. Both father and sons are portrayed in a haunting state of agony. It seems that every inch of the sculpture depicts pain and torment, from basic human emotions while Augustus of Primaporta provides a visible testament to Augustus 's claim to authority. He stands proudly dressed in his military garb pointing to something unknown. The Laocoon Group 's subject matter is mythological, while Augustus is heroic.
The Laocoon Group is naked figures, whereas Augustus of Primaporta is clothed except for the small cupid at his feet. Augustus is shown wearing the cuirass, or breastplate of a military general. According to the University of Michigan, Augustus 's breastplate tells the story of his "pay-back" victory over the Parthians only it does so by means of a symbolic allegory, filled with gods and goddesses. This manifests Augustus 's role as imperator, or head of Rome 's military forces and the small cupid hints at Augustus 's divine descent from
References: Henry M. Sayre (2005), A World of Art. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Academy of Art University (1929-2005), writing a Compare/Contrast Art Essay retrieved Jan. 04, 2006 from the Academy of Art University website: http://arc.academyart.edu/writing/essay.asp Modern Art and Fine Art (2005), A Rational Juxtaposition retrieved Jan. 04, 2006 from the Rationality website: http://www.rationality.net/art.htm University of Michigan (2005), More on Roman Architecture retrieved Jan. 08, 2006 from the University of Michigan website: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mxb/romanarchit_part2.html