Beowulf and the 13th Warrior are two stories that are centered around the Anglo-Saxon culture and even though they have many things in common, there are a few key differences to the stories. These are two great stories that portray the Anglo-Saxon culture very well. The two stories both show good and evil, different companions, and how they memorialize the dead. The written story, Beowulf, can only describe some of the gruesome details. The movie however brought out some of those details into full light. Such as, when the North Men pass around their "community bowl." It does not seem vastly surprising if that had actually occurred in the barbaric culture. Even though the Anglo-Saxon people seem barbaric they are still quite an organized culture.…
The Filibusters Group of soldiers of fortune led by William Walker who invaded Nicaragua in an attempt to set up english speaking colonies under his control. At the time this practice was called filibustering, hence the name for the soldiers. This was important at the time period because it led to the strenuous ties involving the Clayton- Bulwer treaty. This caused discontent not only in Washington but in England as well with each thinking there might be a breach in the treaty. Clayton-…
Between the 1930’s and the 1950’s, a lot of things happened in the NFL. The draft was introduced to the league in 1936 to acquire college players. The first televised professional game occurred in 1939 between the Philadelphia Eagles and the Brooklyn “Football” Dodgers. In 1941, the NFL would name it’s very first commissioner. During World War II, teams would merge as there was a major player shortage. In the late 1940’s and early 1950’s would a lot more teams end up joining the league.…
Another similarity between the battles is that Beowulf is unable to defeat them with mortal weapons. In his battle against Grendal, he attempts to use the weapons from his men , but nothing harms Grendal, which forces Beowulf to fight him with his own hands. While fighting Grendal’s mother Beowulf attempts to use his sword, a mortal weapon, but it…
There are many vast differences and many similarities between the story of Beowulf and The 13th Warrior written by a Christian Monk and the story called Eaters of the Dead what was later know as The 13th Warrior written by Ibn Fadlan who was Moslem which was later written by Michael Crichton. Then there was a movie called The 13th Warrior. The two things that will be compared and contrasted are going to be the movie of The 13th Warrior and the Epic of Beowulf.…
Differences are more common than similarities when Beowulf is compared with Sir. Gawain. The Similarities are small things like both lead characters are renound heros, both characters have fought galiantly in many battles, both characters are mighty warriors, both characters were considered perfect by their society's standards. The differences on the other hand were major things like Sir Gawain was a knight and remained a knight, therefore was subject to his king. Beowulf, on the other hand, started as a subject of kings, even though he was admired by kings, yet he eventually became a king himself. Another major difference is in the spiritual realm. Beowulf, as with all warrior societies, seemed to rely on spiritualism and ancient spells or relics. Whereas Sir. Gawain was a knight, and as such maintained a devout christian faith relying only on God.…
Many books subsist that have been made into films to go along with them, but they somehow never genuinely thoroughly match. In today's society, Beowulf and Grendel (Gunnarsson), the movie integrated material to relate it to a more modern audience. Engenderments companies predicated the way they make their movies on the way society accepts things and on the cultural views of their audience. For example, in Beowulf (Heaney) the apes Beowulf subjugated the “demon monster”, Grendel just for glory. In antithesis, the film Beowulf was more compassionate and cared to ken what they Danes had done to upset Grendel for him to optate to kill their people. Not only did characters differ from the epic to the movie, but many incipient ones were withal introduced.…
As the epic poem Beowulf involves arms getting ripped off, heads being decapitated, and monsters being slayed, the movie Beowulf has more of a detailed, twisted view. Reading and watching Beowulf presented multiple differences. Although Grendel and the other monsters were just known as villains in the written version, the movie included more symbolic characters.…
The change from a tenth century hero to a modern hero in pieces of literary was one who was the strongest, smartest, best fighter, and compassionate to his people to a hero who is much meeker, compassionate, caring, empathetic, has others help when it is needed, and tries to help his friends when they needed it. The change in a hero from the tenth century to a more modern hero does show a change in our humanity. These works of literary reflect the values that their society holds. I feel that with the changes of the heroes in these two stories do reflect an improvement in our humanity. In Beowulf the only way you could have any type of glory was that when you killed someone, in The of Lord the Rings you just have to be well known or have a great destiny that was fated to them. The next thing is that Frodo can empathy with other characters as opposed to Beowulf who really does not empathy with others. Women have a little more value in the modern hero's story, they have names, play a role in the story, and somewhat independent. . Beowulf on the other hand did not treat women with respect, most of the female…
In conclusion there were many changes to the epic poem, Beowulf. Hollywood will change the original stories and poems to a movie that people will watch and actually like more than reading the book. Hollywood did this to make it more appealing to different audiences. The good versus the evil was made present in the movie. Personal relationships were made more complex, a way to get more people interested in watching the…
There are a lot of differences the two stories have to one another. In the book King Hrothgar seems as if he would be more put together and a gentleman but in the book he is a drunk and messy man. In the book they make Grendel react to the word of God and that is what angers him and makes him want to kill and destroy the hall. In the movie he attacks because the loud music hurts his ears, and that makes him shrink if it gets too loud which is how Beowulf was able to cut off his arm and kill Grendel in the movie. Another difference that was very noticed was that in the movie Grendel’s mother is very sexy and seductive and she convinces Beowulf to sleep with her and have a child and he will have all power and the whole Kingdom of Denmark, which is what had happened to Hrothgar too. Which means that Grendel was actually Hrothgar’s son that he created when he was seduced by Grendel’s Mother when he went to kill her. In the book that never happened, he actually killed Grendel with the sword that Unferth had given him. The movie added a lot of different details to make the story much more interesting and adding a sexy monster definitely grabbed the people’s attention. Especially if Angelina Jolie played Grendel’s Mother's…
For over thousands of years, a poem has been told and has been passed on through generations of families. This poem is called Beowulf. Beowulf is an old Anglo Saxon poem that got told throughout many years by scops and would be accompanied by a lyre. It was very famous and would be told often at different places where there were a lot of people. This poem is one of the first to be told in the old-english language. However after various years of being told it finally got written down. But recently, there have been various movies that have been produced that tell the poem of Beowulf, the warrior who fought bravely against monsters. In the Beowulf movie and poem, there are similarities and differences in the comportment of a hero, gender roles, and in the role of religion, which reveal themes that reflect both Anglo Saxon and modern societies.…
Throughout the film, it isn't hard to notice that Beowulf is more noble and slightly a more gentlemen. It shows him fighting to protect the people of the kingdom; he doesn't just do this for the fame, glory, or rewards. That is what we did know of Beowulf in the book though. His fighting was just to be self-centered and selfishly misusing his abilities for his own good, not for the good of others. Both Beowulf vs. Beowulf have completely different personalities in the film and book, and do each task in a different way. All that was just discussed of Beowulf was all regard to the concept of honor, good and evil.…
Firstly, both stories’ main protagonists represent the positive expectations of good individuals in their respective societies. In turn, the monsters and antagonists of the stories represent the marginalities of Anglo-Saxon society and the lowly peasants of English society. Lastly, both books explore similar themes of greed and wrath through the characterization of a dragon, and Tolkien builds upon social commentary present in Beowulf to create a statement about the social illnesses that lead to the Great Depression. At first glance, these works of art seem vastly different and unconnected. However, careful observation reveals that pieces of prose and poetry written throughout history have a tendency to repeat literary themes, borrowing from one another and morphing ideas to create more relevant and more compelling…
Beowulf and Hercules are both extremely heroic characters with tons of characteristics that make them that seem that way. Both Hercules and Beowulf are very well known heroes that have had stories told about them for hundreds and hundreds of years. They both have similarities and differences but the similarities definitely outweigh the differences.…