Preview

Compare And Contrast Christian And Byzantine Empires

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Christian And Byzantine Empires
Byzantine Empire : As the first Christian Emperor of Rome, Constantine claimed to have divine favor for his rule. He defined Christian practices and intervened in theological disputes. This policy came to be known as "caesaropapism", whereby the emperor ruled as both secular lord and religious leader. This tendency to exalt Byzantine emperors as absolute rulers of both state and church was reinforced by the appearance of Justinian in the 6th century. He was an energetic, capable ruler with an energetic, capable wife called Theodora, a very religious Christian.
• Extension of the political boundaries of the empire to regain most of the western territories again, only to be lost by later emperors
• The development of the Justinian Code, a law code that systemized Roman law going back to the Republic and continuing through the empire
• Of the accomplishments listed, the Justinian Code is the emperor's most enduring legacy, since it became the basis of law in western Europe and eventually the United States.
…show more content…
They controlled much of what is now France by the 5th century C.E. when their leader Clovis led his forces on a campaign that wiped out the remains of Roman authority a few years after Rome's fall in 476. Clovis converted to Christianity, under some pressure from his wife, and from then, the Franks' conquests were done in the name of Jesus. One of his descendants, Charlemagne, ruled a kingdom that spread across a huge part of Europe, including both modern day France and Germany. Charlemagne was able to rescue the Roman Pope from captivity, and the Pope returned the favor by crowning Charlemagne as the new "Holy Roman Emperor," uniting church and state. Still, the Pope was the one controlling the crown, and the ceremony took place in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He became the king of the Franks, the most successful kingdom compared the other kingdoms in Western Europe, in the year 481. Under Clovis’s rule, the Franks overtook the Roman province of Gaul. Later on, Clovis changed his religion to Christianity, which resulted him to continue having support from the Gauls, as well as gaining allies from the Roman Catholic…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    together with Justinian 's Digest and Institutes, it became the basis for civil law in almost every modern European nation.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justinian was known partly for rebuilding the Roman Empire; he restored what was left after the defeat between the Romans and the barbaric tribes. But according to document 2 Justinian was hypocritical, secretive by temperament, and two faced. But he was very clever and had a great ability to hide his real opinion. Justinian had such a great power over his empire that he was able to make the people of Constantinople convert to the Christian religion, making them believe in only one God. According to document 3 the emperor was equal to all men in nature of his…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The empire itself became to large for one central authority to govern. The emperor Diocletian split the empire into two separate parts: eastern and western. Constantinople was the capital of the East and Rome remained the capital of the West. Both were individually ruled by their own emperor. The split happened after Constantine died and did not become permanent until 395 CE. Separate political parties controlled the empires and they never unified.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    26. Justinian Code: a collection of laws and legal interpretations formed with the support of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How did the Byzantine empire differ from the Western Roman Empire? The Byzantine Empire was different in many ways from the Western Roman Empire, in that the leader of the Byzantine Empire has more power, not only does he rule the kingdom, he also was head of the church. Another difference between the two empires is, wile the western empire still spoke Latin, the peoples of the Byzantine Empire spoke Greek. There were many differences between the religious practices of both empires but the largest few being that they preached in Greek, the priests in the churches could also marry unlike the Western Empire. The churches in the Byzantine Empire additionally, created large mosaics that they used to convey their image of God.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Religion played a role in the governments of the Byzantine Empire and Western Roman Empire. The emperors were highly involved with the religion and had the ability to make the rules. In the Byzantine Empire, the emperors ruled by the church and the government. The Christian idea of Iconoclasm played a huge role during this time. The laws were created by the emperors and enforced through government and religion. Similarly in the Western Roman Empire, emperors were involved in both the religion and government. They used religion to make people obey the laws. Overall, religion played a huge role in the governments of the Byzantine Empire and the Western Roman Empire.…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Establishing peace and order gave Rome stability: Rome’s first code of law was established in 450B.C. On ten tablets, ten legal experts wrote down a list of Roman customs about property and punishment. However, due to plebeian pressure, two more tablets were added to satisfy them. The final code was called the Laws of the Twelve Tables.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide Final

    • 1127 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Complicated, unorganized. Organized and explained Roman Law in one text. Created a model for law codes used in many countries today. Defined and explained terms. Broke down laws into either natural, civil, national.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao theory

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Byzantine culture, political organization, and economic orientation help to explain the rift between the eastern and western versions of Christianity. Different rituals grew from Greek and Latin versions of the Bible. Emperors resisted papal attempts to interfere in religious issues. Hostility greeted the effort of the Frankish king, Charlemagne, to be recognized as Roman emperor. The final break between the two churches occurred in 1054 over arguments about the type of bread used in the mass and the celibacy of priests. Even though the two churches remained separate, they continued to share a common classical heritage.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundations of an ancient empire are shaped by many characteristics originating in a civilization’s social, philosophical, and theological values. Collectively these will bring about an empire that has aspects which will classify them in distinctive ways. The aspects that will be compared between Persia and Rome are the motives for expansion, methods of expansion, the administration, the impact on those conquered and the original empire, and the reasons for the decline of each empire. When combined, these aspects predispose the individual overall shape of ancient Rome and Persia. Both empires began with conquering larger rulers and creating vast empires which had never been seen before, but as they grew, their ideologies on diversification differed because of the characteristics of their empires. The Persians mainly decided to let those which they conquered remain culturally unaltered allowing for more acceptance and acknowledgement of their ruling entity. On the other hand, the Romans aggressively attempted to Romanize the conquered, creating unease and tension.…

    • 2331 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justinian had created a unique Byzantine empire propelled by god-complex fueled fist of ruling. “The Emperor is equal to all men in the nature of his, but in the authority of his rank he is similar to God, who rules all.” This means that Justinian had so much power that he was compared to the god who has the power who has the power to do anything. Also, Justinian was an artful, dishonest, reserved over temperament, two faced talented person with the astonishing skill to conceal his real judgment and lied all the…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One greatest Justinian’s achievement wa preserving the Roman law. While Justinian was a Consul he gathered all Roman laws and political views and put them in a code called Justinian’s Code(Poole 8) . This set of laws supports the idea that all people should be equal in the eyes of law (Poole 11). Many countries in the world have used the Justinian code as the basis for their own laws…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome’s classical period was distinguished by its belief in the laws: imperial law, God’s law and church laws. Rome also believed in human love and forgiveness. The latter…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Byzantine empire was the Eastern Roman empire. The capital of the Byzantine empire was Constantinople. The capital of Constantinople gave the Eastern Roman Empire significant strategic advantage,because it was right on the trade routes between Europe and Asia as well as the Mediterranean and Black Seas. The Byzantine Empire was located in where Rome was. The Byzantine Empire consisted of the Eastern Roman Empire and parts of the Western Roman Empire, which they had to reconquer part of the empire.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays