Preview

Compare And Contrast Grutter And Gratz

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1320 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Grutter And Gratz
Grutter and Gratz Distinguished, set apart from, or excelling others of its kind. Or in other words, special treatment. The law likes to stand by a claim that no group of people receives special treatment, while coincidently, no group receives unfair treatment. However, the world we live in is not a perfect one, so discrimination is a common thing. The most common form of discrimination our country experiences is racial discrimination. Minority groups living in America often feel that they are discriminated against. The Constitution of the United States has strived to create a world where people from every race and ethnicity can enjoy the same natural rights in our country.The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, states …show more content…
Bollinger, and Gratz v. Bollinger, and in both cases, caucasian applicants felt that they had been unfairly denied admission. They believed they were being reversely discriminated against, as they watched applicants from minority groups receive benefits they did not have access to. These benefits helped the minority students get into specific universities, while caucasian applicants were beat out. In these situations, I do not believe obtaining a critical mass of minority students is that important. If the fact that they are a minority has not put them at a financial or educational disadvantage, than there is no reason that only a certain group of people should be given automatic benefits, just for their race.
Let’s take a closer look at the court case Grutter v. Bollinger. In this case, justices upheld the affirmative action policy that the University of Michigan had in place. In previous cases, colleges were allowed to consider race as a factor in the admissions policy. This is what is known as a precedent, which is defined as an earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances. In Grutter v. Bollinger, the members of justice decided to continue to allow race to be considered as a factor in the admission

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    G.This case is significant because it reinforced the precedent that race if a factor has to be a small factor and it also decided the in lower education race should not be a factor in deciding who can go to what…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the present case, the question is whether Joe Smith parent can file a lawsuit because he was discriminated against due to his race, sex, national origin, religion, and/or financial means. Like in the Yick Wo case, Smith is discriminated due to his national origin. Even though, his origin is white and the admissions policy might appear neutral to some, but it is applied unequally to whites. In DeFunis v Odegaard, this case was ruled moot because Defunis was in his last year of law school, so the courts would have to wait for a later case to set a precedent. In Bakke v. UC Board of Regents, the court would decide that at place of higher education can use race in their admission policy, but it cannot be the lone deciding factor. When the university…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article sheds light on the last affirmative action case which was 10 years ago. The article goes into detail about the 13 page dissent that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy issued after the ruling. The article also talks about whether or not colleges should be allowed to take race into consideration so that they can have diverse classes.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    OPINION: The special admissions program is unconstitutional, but race may be considered as a factor in the admissions process. Justice Lewis Powell (J. Powell), writing for the court, says that the Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) should not pay attention to past discrimination in reviewing the policies of the University, as this is equivalent to allowing political trends to dictate constitutional principles. J. Powell determines that accepting a minimum number of minorities simply to reduce the traditional deficit of such individuals in the medical profession is unconstitutional, as it gives preference to an individual on the basis of race alone. The major determination of the Supreme Court is whether or not racial preference may be used to promote diversity of the student body. J. Powell argues that setting aside a specified number of minority slots is not congruent to the purported goal – minority students in…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The effect of this case was that racial quotas were ruled to be unconstitutional, while affirmative action programs would remain constitutional. These affirmative action programs would rule as constitutional as long as race is one of many admission factors, it is used to remedy past findings of discrimination, or to promote the school’s diversity levels. This also allowed more diversity to be added to universities and this topic would be brought up once again in Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) where Bakke’s case requirements allowed the University of Michigan’s affirmative action program to pass through by having the interest of a diverse student body and giving significant but not determinative weight to its applicants’ race. ("The Supreme Court. Expanding Civil Rights. Landmark Cases. Regents of California v. Bakke…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On June 23rd 2016, the judges of the supreme court gathered to analyze a challenge about the University of Texas of Austin’s race-conscious admissions program. This case, known as Fisher II v. The University of Texas, was brought about when senior Abigail Fisher applied to the University of Texas and did not get in. She was not accepted in the top ten percent program as well( a program in Texas Law stating that top ten percent students from all schools in Texas get automatic admission into UT Austin), and firmly believed that she had the academic status to get in. She implied that the fact that she was white and had a good financial status reduced her chances of admission into the university and that she was heavily racially discriminated.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    V. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN THE COURTS - Any program, whether enacted by a government or by a private organization, whose goal is to overcome the results of past unequal treatment of minorities and/or women by giving members of these groups preferential treatment in admissions, hiring, promotions or other aspects of life…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court accepted that the “critical mass” concept was not an “outright racial balancing”, where race was used as a factor in the admission process (Alexander 151). Therefore, the Court held that diversity is a compelling interest for the University of Michigan Law School as long as race is not the only factor considered for admission. In addition, the Court concluded that the “benefits of diversity are substantial” and “promotes cross racial understanding, helps to break down racial stereotypes, and enables students to better understand persons of difference races” (Chemenrisky 772). Moreover, “the Court accepted the university’s argument that the education of all students is enhanced with a diverse student body”…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution contains the Citizenship Clause, the Due Process Clause, and the Equal Protection Clause. The Citizenship Clause maintains the citizenship of individuals who were born or naturalized in the United States. The Due Process Clause maintains that a state is prohibited from denying an individual of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The Equal Protection Clause prohibits a state from denying an individual “within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” As it seeks to safeguard the liberties of citizens, the Fourteenth Amendment has been utilized to prevent discrimination against individuals based upon gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, etc. since…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion was “the Court held that the Law School flexible admissions program does not unduly harm members of any racial group, because all applicants have the opportunity to demonstrate how they would contribute to the diversity of the entering class” (Summary of Supreme…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lesley Oelsner, "Court to Weigh College Admission That Gives Minorities Preference," New York Times, 23 Feb 1977, pg…

    • 4130 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil rights law in the United States is a complex system that includes both constitutional and statutory elements. The Fourteenth Amendment, a landmark constitutional provision, prohibits states from denying equal protection of laws to persons within their jurisdictions. Since the 1940s, the Supreme Court has ruled that all state-sponsored racial discrimination is inherently suspect, and the principle of equal protection applies to the federal government and its agencies via the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In the modern era, the Supreme Court has recognized that the constitutional principle of equal protection applies to other forms of intentional, official discrimination, including gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, and immigration status. Congress has enacted laws to enforce the constitutional principle of equal protection, affecting not only governmental agencies but also private institutions receiving federal funding.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ We came equals into this world, and equals shall we go out.” Based on the Constitution, it is possible for individuals in society to achieve equality because the First, Nineteenth, Third and Thirteenth Amendments give citizens of the United States freedoms that were not originally given in the Constitution. Most of the Amendments give reasons for equality in the U.S. For Example, the First Amendment gives freedom of speech, religion, press, and the right to assemble and petition. The Constitution gives equality in the United States because they give citizens freedoms that were not originally given in the Constitution. On the other hand, people may think that the Constitution does not give equality because some of the Amendments do not sound like they give for equality, but in a way they do. The Constitution does give for equality and freedom in the United States because of the Amendments today.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act was signed, many Asians immigrated from Asia to America and have been taking over college applications. In result, of many Asian immigrants wishing to live the American dream, they work hard and their college applicants are highly qualified. When majority of the students are Asian many questions and problems arose. In response, requirements for each ethnic group were raised or lowered in order for more diversity in some colleges. This caused more anger from the Asian community and many colleges, universities and ivy leagues received many lawsuits for discrimination. In order for colleges to reverse the problems they have created and have the same results, they need to cap the amount of students…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Affirmative Action especially causes a reverse discriminate effect against Asian Americans, although also against Caucasians. The reverse discrimination caused from preferential treatment to African Americans, Latinos, and Native Americans discriminates against Asian Americans because they lose spots at colleges that they would have otherwise received. At the UC San Diego Medical School “chicanos were offered admission at five times the rate of whites and nineteen times the rate of Japanese Americans. [Asian Americans are a] nonwhite, racialized minority [that are] being hurt by [Affirmative Action]” (“Race and Representation: Affirmative Action” 273). If the goal of Affirmative Action is to reverse discrimination done to minorities in the past then Asian Americans should be included in Affirmative Action programs, not discriminated against further. College Affirmative Action programs completely ignore, if not intentionally harm, Asian American students. Statistics shown from the “University of California Berkeley show that 41 percent of the students attending are from an Asian American background [up from 20 percent before affirmative action was forbidden]. On the other hand only 14 percent of the students attending Harvard University” (College Reviews by Students for Students – College…

    • 2888 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays