In order to compare Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism one must first try to understand the meaning of both. In Judicial Restraint judges technically limit their power and preserve all laws of congress, unless they are unconstitutional. In other words, judicial restraint means, that a judge, that is deciding constitutional law, should defer it to the legislative and executive branches. Furthermore, judges should only interpret the law ad not make new policies. A Judge that is judicially restrained decides on cases not airing his personal view or any ideas they may have because they cannot be heard and if the two other branches of government cannot resolve a conflict the
In order to compare Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism one must first try to understand the meaning of both. In Judicial Restraint judges technically limit their power and preserve all laws of congress, unless they are unconstitutional. In other words, judicial restraint means, that a judge, that is deciding constitutional law, should defer it to the legislative and executive branches. Furthermore, judges should only interpret the law ad not make new policies. A Judge that is judicially restrained decides on cases not airing his personal view or any ideas they may have because they cannot be heard and if the two other branches of government cannot resolve a conflict the