Preview

Compare And Contrast Judicial Activism And Judicial Restraint

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
229 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Judicial Activism And Judicial Restraint
Compare and contrast Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint.
In order to compare Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism one must first try to understand the meaning of both. In Judicial Restraint judges technically limit their power and preserve all laws of congress, unless they are unconstitutional. In other words, judicial restraint means, that a judge, that is deciding constitutional law, should defer it to the legislative and executive branches. Furthermore, judges should only interpret the law ad not make new policies. A Judge that is judicially restrained decides on cases not airing his personal view or any ideas they may have because they cannot be heard and if the two other branches of government cannot resolve a conflict the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism in McDonald v. City of Chicago Judicial Restraint is when the Supreme Court restricts their powers to avoid making any changes to public policy, unless that policy is unconstitutional. When applying judicial restraint to cases, the courts stand by stare decisis (previous decisions of the court), uphold current law, and hold strictly to the text of the Constitution. They think that by only interpreting the constitution and not creating new laws, that they are preserving the laws that this country was founded on. Judicial activism is the opposite.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is defined as the least “powerful branch.” In Federalist No. 78, Alexander Hamilton said, that the courts had “neither force nor will, but merely judgment.” Despite his opinion, the judicial branch managed to gain respect and power throughout the years. Despite one’s opinion of the judicial branch, it is a part of the checks and balances system, an important component that was designed to prevent any…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The lower courts tell the high court what they have and that helps the Supreme Court decision more easier. Also all justices have oral arguments to hear one another's saying to making the decision. 5. Briefly discuss the cases of Plessy V. Ferguson (1896) and Brown V. Board of Education (1954). Explain why each is an example of “activism” or “restraint”…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judiciary is the body that interprets and applies the law in the name of the state, they operate under the separation of powers, they do not make laws nor enforce laws but rather they interpret the law and help in its application.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges of the supreme Court.” The Legislative was a check on Executive rights such as making treaties and appointing judicial officers. Therefore, the power of the government was divided, restrained, balanced and checked by itself and especially by the Congress, which provided security to individual’s…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Choice, Happiness, and Spaghetti Sauce was a well thought-out brain teaser type of video. Author and writer Malcom Gladwell introduces the audience to the food industry’s pursuit of the perfect spaghetti sauce, but ends up making a larger argument about the nature of choice and happiness in a comical yet intelligent manor on TEDTalk. Gladwell uses his friend and Psychophysicist Howard Moskowitz’s crazy idea with Pepsi, and breakthrough formula for success with Vlasic Pickles and Prego spaghetti sauce to expose diversity, variability, and finding the true meaning of happiness. Based on the company’s Dr. Moskowitz worked for and inspired, this video has shown me some personal changes in my life that need to be changed.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The storm sets in motion the chain of events that leads to the characters adultery. Do you think the storm excuses the characters in any way from responsibility for their actions?In her short story The Storm, Kate Chopin creates a situation where two people give in to their sexual desire with the help of the outside setting. Although the threatening appearance of the storm does incite the deep rooted emotion; the couple is not excused from their treacherous act since they are well aware of their sin.…

    • 779 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial branch is one of the three branches of the federal government. This branch includes criminal and civil courts and helps interpret the United States constitution. At the constitutional convention of 1787 the birth of the judicial system was born and soon after became adopted to the future of the federal government judicial system. Because of this, the convention it went down in political history and showed the United States how organized and prepared the government was when it came to the court system. But despite the fact that the government was prepared there is a slight controversy that the Judicial branch happens to be the most powerful branch out of the three. What is your belief on the ability and capability of the judicial…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Judicial Branch is the most important branch of the United States government, due to the significant role it plays in interpreting and determining if laws are constitutional. Even though the Judicial Branch is the smallest in size and has smallest budget of any branch in our nation’s government, it exercises enormous power and is equal to other branches of the government because it has the power of Judicial Review. Judicial Review is the review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The judicial restraint theory is based off the idea that judges should limit the exercise of their own power. For example, it would make judges think before shooting down laws, just because they can, with the exception being that they are unconstitutional. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. Judicial activism is when judges make rulings based on politics or personal beliefs rather than the law itself. The main difference between these two philosophies is judicial restraint is a bit more ethical then judicial activism. Both Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor are minorities to the Supreme Court. However, they both have very different viewpoints when it comes to how their race and background play a role in their rulings.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Apparently a great many people have forgotten that the framers of our Constitution went to such great effort to create an independent judicial branch that would not be subject to retaliation by either the executive branch or the legislative branch because of some decision made by those judges."said by Sandra Day O'Connor, former associate justice of the supreme court. The judicial branch translates the importance of laws, applies laws to induvial cases, and chooses if laws disregard the constitution. This legal branch is involved the supreme court and other government courts. Even though people argue that the judicial branch has too much power, the Supreme Court should still have the ability to declare laws passed by congress unconstitutional…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout American history, decisions made by the Supreme Court have profoundly affected society. According to the idea of judicial review, the Supreme Court is able to make final determination on whether or not a law is constitutional or unconstitutional. With this idea of judicial review, the Supreme Court made many influential decisions which has shaped society into the way it is today. Decisions of the Supreme Court can have a huge impact on the country. Throughout United States history, court decisions have rocked the nation and have totally changed how the government runs things.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Definition of judicial restraint, mention Marbury V Madison (1803). Set out argument strict constructionists argue that the SC should stick to the original intentions of the FF whilst loose constructionists argue that the SC must reinterpret the Constitution in order to move with the times and bring it up-to-date. Judicial restraint has an impact on many members of US society that are not protected under the original Constitution. Main- All decisions whether restrained or activist have huge political significance. E.g. abortion, Rights of African Americans, etc. If restrained, the court can turn away cases and choose not to even hear them. The SC can pick and choose (they only choose between 90-100 cases to hear a year). Liberals argue…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the judicial restraint philosophy is more appropriate for federal judges to follow because, unlike judicial activism, it does not allow judges to expand vague Constitutional principles to fit their own viewpoint and principles. Judicial restraint does not authorize judges to interpret Constitutional texts and laws (conservative or liberal interpretation) in order to serve their own principles, policies, and considered estimates of the vital needs of contemporary society. The judicial restraint policy also ensures that separation of powers is applied justly so that different branches of government do not intervene with the power of the other branch. Also, because the Stare Decisis has a huge impact on future decisions and precedent,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neda was a free spirited individual who was against, and even rebelled against the complete government control of Iran who unfortunately lost her life because of it. As the filmed mentioned a few times, she was a rebel. In my eyes she was not a rebel in a negative way, but a rebel in a way that she wanted to be able to show her individuality, her own personal style, and did not want to be under the complete control and dictatorship of the Iranian regime. She stood for independence, individuality, and a free-spirit lifestyle that we are so very fortunate of in this country. She unfortunately lost her life because of her desire for independence as a woman, in my opinion she was assassinated, it was not just a random act of violence that claimed her life but rather a cold blooded murder! I believe that she was targeted! As the film stated she was an extremely beautiful woman, and beautiful woman like Neda are…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays