Preview

Compare And Contrast Senate And House Of Representatives

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
186 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Senate And House Of Representatives
The great compromise was an agreement between the states that government should be split into the two houses, House of Representatives and Senate. Document D, a section of the Constitution, explains what each of the two houses can do. In article 1, section 2, about the House of Representatives, it states, “Representatives...shall be apportioned...according to…(population)”. Later in article 1, section 3, this time about the Senate, it writes, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the legislatures thereof for six years…”. Two of the sections from the Constitution reveal the houses of government. The first house was the House of Representatives. This house was based on population of a certain
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq Essay
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ap Us History Dbq Essay

    The economic problems troubled the thirteen states of the Confederation set the point for the formation of a strong central government under the federal constitution. Even though the original objective of the convention was to improve the Articles of Confederation. Immediately the ones who attended decided to build a new plan for a national government. That plan was known as the United States Constitution, and the Philadelphia convention became known as the Constitutional Convention of 1787. (Openstax, 202) One of the problems that the delegates talked about was about the way the representatives of the new government would be chosen. How would they be elected, and who would elect them. James Madison put forward a recommendation known as the Virginia Plan, which was about having a strong national government that could void state laws. The Virginia Plan also called for the addition of an executive branch and a judicial branch, both if which were not included in the Articles of Confederation. William Paterson brought in the New Jersey Plan to counter Madison’s plan, recommending that all states have equal votes in a unicameral national legislature. He also stated the economic problems by requesting that Congress have the power to administer trade to raise revenue through taxes on importations, and through postage, and to reinforce Congressional demands from the states. From Connecticut, Roger Sherman suggested an understanding known as the Great Compromise outlining a…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Period/Critical Period/Federalist Period
    • 6730 Words
    • 27 Pages

    Constitutional Period/Critical Period/Federalist Period

    The government’s inability to tax and raise an army, as well as their lack of central power, led to what became known as the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The Founding Fathers met to fix the problems with the Articles, but ended up drafting the Constitution instead. During the convention, several different plans were discussed. The first was the Virginia Plan, written by James Madison, which suggested the existence of both an executive and legislative branch. The legislative branch was to have two houses of Congress, each with representation based on population. In contrast, the New Jersey Plan was to have a unicameral legislative branch with equal representation for each state. With the help of Benjamin Franklin, the Great Compromise was created, which combined the two plans. It called for three branches; including a legislative branch comprised of two houses. The Senate was to have equal representation from each state, while the…

    • 6730 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    14th Amendment Structure
    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    14th Amendment Structure

    The issue still was how congress would allot for its representatives given the numbers of constituents in each of the states; originally they attempted one for every thirty thousand which if initially ratified would have fell short of the necessary three-fourths (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). Direct representation Madison would point out during the attempt to find a solution is impossible, even a tiny state like Rhode island would find it difficult to be at every assembly, he insisted on a smaller select group (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). The one in every thirty thousand would be later changed to one in every forty thousand and would be adjusted every ten years as the population grew (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). This mathematical formula made little sense as Mr. Amar states “if the population grew from eight to nine million in a decade the house would be 200 delegates” which would negate the condition that there not be more than one for every fifty thousand (Amar, Akhil Reed, 1992). This section changed in 1910 the basis of representation was one for every 210,000 inhabitants, and it wasn’t till the 1930’s by the act of June 1929 that the house was restricted to 435 members, now they just continue to divide the population to meet the electoral quota (Corwin et al., 1978). The senate allocations are extremely less problematic provided by section 3 of article one it simply states there will be two senators for each state, and even the addition in the 17th amendment does not change much but adds the basis if there are any vacancy (Corwin et al.,…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The US Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?
    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The US Constitution Guard Against Tyranny?

    In the House of Representatives, the amount of representatives is based on the population of the state. Larger states have more representation and smaller states have less representation. For example, Delaware only has one representative, but Virginia has ten. If all of the states with a large population agreed on something small states won’t favor the vote will definitely pass because the smaller states have less representatives. The Great Compromise solved this problem by adding another house in Congress, the Senate. In the Senate, each state has two representatives, making the polls much more fair for the states with a smaller…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis
    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

    Each state according to population got a number of representatives (each state had at least one representative), and two senators. This is what caused the big states v. small states issue. Why was this an issue? Well the large states obviously would have been happier with their representation in the House like, Virginia. “Representatives…shall be appointed…according to……

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the Claim That the Senate Is Far More Powerful Than the House of Representatives
    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evaluate the Claim That the Senate Is Far More Powerful Than the House of Representatives

    Evaluate the claim that the Senate is far more powerful than the House of Representatives…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Dbq Analysis
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tyranny Dbq Analysis

    This document talks about the population of some states. Such as New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia. ¨Representatives shall be apportioned, according to population.¨ ¨The state of New Hampshire shall be entitled to three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode Island ... one, Connecticut five, New York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.¨ Every state shall be composed of two senators, and each state shall also have a random number of representatives. This was the last document as which you have read, now as you can see so far this also balances out because depending on the population they get a certain amount of…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Our Founding Founders Influence The Creation Of Separation Of Power?
    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Our Founding Founders Influence The Creation Of Separation Of Power?

    Meanwhile, the representative in the house depends upon the state population. But every state is entitle to one representative. 7. The bills involving raising revenue originated in the House Of Representative. 8.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Can The Constitution Prevent The Centralization Of Government Power
    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Can The Constitution Prevent The Centralization Of Government Power

    The Constitution intended to create a new self-controlling central government of the United States. The country’s power was divided into three branches: legislative, executive and judiciary, and the strongest legislative branch was further divided into two houses: House of Representatives and Senate. This allowed them to check and balance each other, thus prevented the centralization of power in one branch. Therefore, by creating a government structure where no single group of people could seize absolute power, the state’s power over people and especially minorities was restrained. Under the Legislative branch, the House of Representatives “shall be composed of Members chosen every second year by the People of the several States” (Article…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Most Significant Issues Facing The New Republic
    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Most Significant Issues Facing The New Republic

    In addition, the states were focused on different ideas that did or did not coincide with a central government or its distribution of power. As a result, delegates in both a big and smaller state came up with two different strategies, the Virginia and New Jersey Plan. The Virginia Plan wanted the representation be based on population and the New Jersey Plan wanted equal representation for each state. With both plans being rejected, the Great Compromise was issued, allowing the Senate to deal with equal representation, while House took on the representation of the population…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Three Branches Of Government
    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Three Branches Of Government

    The United States government is made up of three branches; the Judicial, the Executive, and the Legislative branch. These branches were put into order by our founding fathers of the United States, and our framers of the US constitution who realized, problems were beginning to emerge because under the Articles of Confederation, our government did not have enough power. “The states were basically taking control of themselves; printing their own money, conducting foreign trade that was in violation of national law, and building and organizing their own armed forces” (“The Constitution.” The Judicial Learning Center). These actions led to a meeting known as the “Constitutional Convention” in 1787, where delegates from twelve of the thirteen states met to discusses the matters at hand. However, they decided to start fresh; pushed the AOC to the side and began discussing what type of government they truly needed.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Dbq
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tyranny Dbq

    Another method the Constitution protects against tyranny is The Great Compromise, which was organizing Congress into two houses: one based on population, and the other on equality of states. The evidence used for The Great Compromise came from document D, titled The Great Compromise, explained that Congress is divided into two houses, with one based on equal representation in the Senate, the other based on states’ population. The argument associated with The Great Compromise is that the compromise prevents the large states from over-controlling the small population of small…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Great Compromise Definition
    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Great Compromise Definition

    The Great Compromise or “Connecticut Compromise”, is the result of two plans in one. It consists of the New Jersey Plan and Virginia Plan, in order to satisfy both large and small states. The Great Compromise is made of two house legislatures, the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Senate gratifies smaller states by having a legitimate number of representatives for each state. The House of Representatives gratifies the larger states with larger populations by appointing one representative for every 30,000 citizens.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Revolution's Effects on American Society
    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Revolution's Effects on American Society

    The Connecticut Compromise was passed in 1787, which guaranteed that all states would be represented equally despite their state’s size. This compromise partially defined the representation that states would have as well as the basic legislative structure in the Constitution, which was ratified…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Informative Essay: The Constitutional Convention
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Informative Essay: The Constitutional Convention

    This is also included in the Connecticut plan. No one could agree on if representation should be based on population or if it should be equal. Impressive points were made on both sides, such as, how population based representation could result in only a few states running the country, while the smaller ones have no say. On the contrary, bigger states that have more people have more viewpoints from their state, creating the need for more representation. In the great compromise, proposed by Roger Sherman, the lower house delegates would be determined by population, and the upper house would be an equal amount of representatives from each state. One minor topic discussed along with this was if slaves should count as population. This was just to gain power, as many states had about as many slaves as they did citizens. I particularly loved what Benjamin Franklin said about the proposal. “If you treat them as people, they count as people.” However, he apparently was not influential enough and the 3/5s compromise was made. This allowed each slave to be worth 3/5s of a person when determining population. There were definitely many problems with this, one being the fact that you can actually buy political power, but it was the only thing almost everyone could settle…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More