Preview

Compare How ‘Who’s for the Game?’ and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ Present War and How They Reflect the Authors View Point

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare How ‘Who’s for the Game?’ and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ Present War and How They Reflect the Authors View Point
Compare how ‘Who’s for the Game?’ and ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ present war and how they reflect the authors view point. ‘Who’s for the Game?’ was written by Jessie Pope in 1915 (At the beginning of the First World War). Jessie Pope was an English poet who began writing for Punch; between 1902 and 1922 she supplied 170 poems to the magazine. She was a prolific writer of humorous verse, articles, and short stories, which were published in many newspapers including the Daily Mail, the Daily Express, the Evening Standard, The Queen, and the Westminster Gazette. The purpose of the poem ‘Who’s for the game?’ is to persuade men to become part of the army and fight for England. The main message in this poem is if you join the army then you will feel a true champion and it will be glorious. She describes the war as being a glorious and triumphant place and a place where you are very heroic and although it may be challenging you will have a laugh. This is an unrealistic poem of the reality of war.
‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ was written in 1917 during the last stages of the war. This poem was written by Wilfred Owen, an English poet who experienced the reality of war whilst fighting on the Western front. He died in action one week before the conclusion of the war. The purpose of this poem was to show everyone that war was nothing like what Jessie Pope had said it was. The main message in this poem is war makes you feel so tired you can hardly walk and if you happen not to be physically killed then you are mentally killed. This is a very realistic poem about how tired and frail the soldiers were and how it destroyed them.
In ‘Who’s for the Game’ the main purpose of this poem is to make you join up. Firstly the title of this poem shows this; it makes the men feel as if it is a competition and they want to prove to their families that they are strong and heroic. It also suggests that it is a bit of a challenge, which makes men believe that they must join up to become

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Weapons Training Analysis

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many techniques used in the poem by Dawe to convey that war is not a game. An example of this is how he uses rhyming, “If you had one more brain… open that drain”. This expresses the pointlessness of war mainly through the words “brain” and “drain”. It shows that Dawe wants to express that if you were stupid enough to go to war, you may as well throw your life away. This concept of futility is also expressed through the repetition of “dead, dead, dead” in the last line of the poem, which emphasises the tremendous loss in war that is inevitable. Dawe also shows that war is not a game through the technique of juxtaposition at the very end of the poem in the sentence “that's right grab and check the magazine man its not a woman’s tit”. This shows that the soldiers must take the weapons training serious in order to survive in…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DeNiro’s Game is a novel based around war and the effects it has both mentally and physically. The novel is set in the war torn country of Lebanon. The main characters, Bassam and George, are greatly affected by the war. Families are destroyed, there is major corruption, and they are forced to make the choice to either stay and fight or to leave the country. This essay will look at the sacrifices and choices made by both characters.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is an intriguing work of fiction that effortlessly combines both aspects of literary and commercial fiction. Connell was able to write a piece that successfully combines fast-paced action as well as upholding literary merit. Not only did Connell write this story with an exciting and adventurous component, he also managed to convey a deeper meaning within the story by allowing his readers to be pulled into the excitement of the story, while also giving them an insight to a darker, more primitive side of human beings. He creatively depicts a unique setting in which the main character has nothing to fear but mankind itself. Connell not only generates…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriotism, determined and controversial can all sum up the propaganda poem ‘’Who’s For The Game’’ which is jingoistic poem. Jessie Pope describes war duty as an honourable thing to do and uses rhetorical questions repeatedly to describe the men who don’t go as cowards. The opening line ‘’Who’s for the game, the biggest that’s played’’ which is a extended metaphor through the poem as the war is referred as a game. The word ‘’biggest’’ emphasizes the importance and fun which the war a waits them.…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the poem by Wilfred Owen “Dulce et Decorum Est” is written in regard of the speakers experience during the war in World War I. Owen writes about the repugnance of the war that the civilians does not know about and fully understand. He explains in his poem the naivety of people by encouraging young men to fight for their country, but in return sentence them to an unnecessary death. The poet makes it clear in the poem that he is personally against the war and the horror he witnessed was overwhelming. Owen illustrated his meaning through imagery, irony, and setting and situation.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War poems are made for the people in the present to know more about the war experiences in the past. But these war poems are to recruit young men to become soldiers. Comparing and contrasting the effects of these two poems about the civil war, one is describing how people need the courage to go into war, even though it means you risk your life for the country. The other poem is about the chaos of it all, how soldiers tried their best -- to being scarred from seeing people die. There are many differences and similarities between “Whos for the Game?” and “Dulce et Decorum Est,” but there are so many more meanings to the words than that are shown.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    War is presented in various ways in literature with each writer presenting it in their own unique way due to influences in their social and historical background e.g. Owen wrote poems about war as he was experiencing it. One of the factors on whether a piece, be it a poem or a play or a novel, was positive or negative towards war all depended on the writer’s attitude towards war e.g. Jessie Pope’s “Who’s For The Game?” is all about her trying to convince men it was all a bit of fun to join the war and fight for their country, which makes perfect sense for a woman to say as women during the time of world war one often encouraged men to join war as they stayed behind to look after the children ect. But the poems I want to discuss are “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen and “Who’s for The Game?” by Jesse Pope. The play i'm going to Discuss is “Macbeth” by William Shakespeare.…

    • 2592 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For there’s only one course to pursue, Your country is up to her neck in a fight, And she’s looking and calling for you. Who's for the Game Page 1 Extended metaphor comparing war to a game makes it seem light-hearted, not serious.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The poems I have chosen to compare in this essay are Wilfred Owen's “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and Jessie Pope's “Who's For The Game?”. The two poems I have chosen to compare are both about the first world war. Yet the two poems have very different opinions on the Great War. My first poem, Dulce et decorum, is against the war and the injustice of it all. It is narrated by one of the soldiers who is fighting in the Great War and having to face the horrors of war. On the contrary my second poem, Who's for the game, is a recruitment poem.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dulce et Decorum Est and Who’s for the Game? are similar and different in many ways, but are both great poems. While Dulce et Decorum Est, written by Wilfred Owen, didn’t believe that it is sweet and right to die for your country, Who’s for the Game?, written by Jessie Pope, does believe this quote is just. These poems both discuss their beliefs/ideas of war and support themselves very deeply and keen. Wilfred Owen says that the saying “it is sweet and right to die for your country” is an old lie. Meanwhile, Jessie Pope says that your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she’s looking and calling for you.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1914 poetry

    • 763 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Jessie Pope’s ‘Who’s for the game’, she gives us crude propaganda throughout the whole poem. She gives ordinary circumstances and links them in with war, showing who is heroic enough to ‘grip and tackle the job unafraid’ and who is too cowardly that ‘he’d rather sit tight’. Also, Pope subtly forces any man who decides to stay home to feel guilty and faint-hearted, she uses another form of propaganda. However, she tried to make the war seem easier than it was so she wrote the poem like a nursery rhyme, in a patriotic and jolly way. She relates the whole poem to a game to decrease the seriousness of the war. Pope uses subtle persuasion to further convince more men to go to war: ‘Who knows it won’t be a picnic -not much- yet eagerly shoulders a gun?’ In the last verse, Pope uses direct address (‘you’) to make the reader feel like she is talking to them. Also, direct address is subtle persuasion but it gets straight to the point. However Pope understates the whole concept of war which can be a kind of deception (propaganda). As we can seem, Jessie Pope’s attitude towards recruitment for war was ardent.…

    • 763 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although ‘Who’s for the game?’ Which is composed by Jessie Pope is about a serious topic, he helps us see the bright side to a war. This is done through rhyme. The use of rhyme gives a musical element in the poem and when combined with a serious topic it would feel as if the poem is trying to fire you up to go sign up and fight for your country in war. “Who’ll give his country a hand? And who wants a seat in the stand?” suggests exactly this.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Who's for the Game" is an optimistic take on war that generates a sense of pride and patriotism for the reader. "Dulce et Decorum Est", on the other hand, illuminates the shame regarding sending soldiers to war and the horrors that soldiers must go through to defend the country. Each poem addresses the topic in its own unique way. The topic, war, has been tackled in movies, TV shows, and literature. Every rendition seems to take a new approach, and not all are similar. War has been and continues to be a subject of either pride or shame for humanity. It will continue with few changes, but the way we perceive it can change. Poems like "Dulce et Decorum Est" remind us about what war truly is, and it gives us a reason to not fight in harmful, petty…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    jessie pope

    • 1516 Words
    • 4 Pages

    jessie Pope was a journalist who wrote recruitment poems for the Daily Mail during the First World War. The poems she did write were positive propaganda poems for the war; her objective was to stimulate patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. Pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared war to a game. This is illustrated in the title 'Who's for the game?' It shows that her attitude to war was that it was a great big event that everyone should take part in one way or another. The title is a short and punchy question inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong impression of the war, it is misleading and Jessie Pope - either intentionally or mistakably. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, but if she did write the actual reality of war, no one would really want to join, therefore the aim of the poem would not be fulfilled and the British army would have no chance of wining in the war.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Who’s for the game’ is a conversational poem through which Jessie Pope’s representation of war encapsulates the jingoistic opinion of her culture: that war was fun, jovial and full of glory that any young man could earn if only he had the courage.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays