Preview

Comparing James Madison's Letter To The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
801 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing James Madison's Letter To The Constitution
Twelve years after declaring independence, the American people were struggling to articulate their vision for government. They were acutely aware of the shortcomings of a weak central government under the Articles of Confederation, yet they still felt strongly that the individual states maintain their power. James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan in 1787, with a goal of stabilizing the budding nation by according more authority to a central government than before. These resolutions would ultimately become a new Constitution. It was in January 1788, after five states had ratified but eight were still skeptical, that Madison penned a letter to the Independent Journal, wherein he detailed his rationale for the larger federal government. …show more content…
He envisioned a system where the powers of the federal government were “few and defined,” and acting mostly upon external affairs and foreign relations. Thus, the federal government would be most active in times of war; however, if it did its job well and kept war to a minimum, “the less frequent [would] be those scenes of danger” where it would have greater authority. The states, on the other hand, would possess more power during peacetime, as they would be more concerned with “numerous and indefinite” tasks, among them the “ordinary course of affairs concern[ing] the lives, liberties, and properties of the people.” Again reflecting John Locke, Madison reminded the people that the new government was indeed formed around the best interests of the people. Madison went on to describe the two new powers accorded to the federal government, namely, the powers to regulate commerce and impose taxes. The former, he asserted, everyone was in agreement on; the latter was also necessary. In order to achieve its purpose of controlling foreign affairs, taxation would be required. Madison’s careful treatment of taxation was likely an attempt to encourage Massachusetts, which was very skeptical of taxes, to ratify the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In response to the formidable factions fear, Madison explained in Federalist Paper 10 how the proposed government would be able to control the effects of any one faction or group. He stated that the larger the government, the better to control factions as it would be more difficult to deceive all the people, and there would be more factions in a larger government and nation, effectively weakening them. In addition to the faction fear, Madison addressed the public’s concern about the strength of the presented government by depicting the checks and balances that were to be implemented. Madison justified the need of a strong, central government by illustrating the practicality of checks and balances and a representative republic…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison speaks in favor of expanding the role of the federal government because he believes that to do so would improve the quality of…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Creating the new Constitution would bind the states into one alliance and allow the country to run smoothly. Hamilton thoughtfully accepts the notion of the government allowing the states running themselves is not foolish. However, the states would be “depending for its execution on the good faith of the parties”(8), and only take laws created by the national government as “mere recommendations” and “disregard at their option” (8). The states selfishness about their own well being and not considering that of the nation is a clear factor that the power of executing in a correct manner as a union is important for the future of the country in order for us not to fall under an anarchy. Furthermore, the flaws of the Articles of Confederation increased overtime causing there to be numerous issues.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson, for example, could not immediately abolish Adams' national bank because it would be too drastic a move for someone with his popularity, despite the fact that it was established without the Constitution granting that power to the federal government (Blum). Jefferson's most grand defiance of his strict interpretation of the Constitution was his purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Even though he was not given the power to purchase land in the Constitution, Jefferson couldn't pass up the opportunity to double the nation's size at a time of such large-scale westward movement. After his presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (document G) that gave his support for change to the Constitution with change to the times, which is a very far leap from claiming that nothing could be done in the national government without the Constitution granting them the power to do it. Madison is guilty of the same deviations from typical Republican strict constructionist policy. He was attacked by John Randolph (document F) for being too much like a Federalist, particularly when using the national government's power to set tariffs like the one proposed in 1816. This was not the first time Madison was attacked for his pseudo-Federalist policies. He received abundant criticisms…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Federalist paper 51, Madison responds to the fear that a national government will lead to the dissolution of a republic, and the creation of a monarchy or despot where the people will no longer rule. His answer to the Anti-Federalist’s rightful fears were to institute three branches of government that would check and balance each other at all times so one branch would…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of Federalism in the United States was a gradual event that had definitions of federal government being given in federalist 46 and 28 which gave definitions of a federalist government to the United States. As stated by James Madison one of the architects of the federal kind of government, “the state and national governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers." The purpose of such a kind of government was to protect the rights of the people in all its earnestness.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On February 6th, 1788 in the state of New York, James Madison, wrote the famous Federalist Paper, “Federalist No. 51”. The Federalist Papers were a set of 85 documents, promoting the ratification of the constitution led by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. Specifically, this documents purpose was for Madison to inform the ideals of the separation of powers and it’s ability to sustain liberty. In order for this to happen, the three branches must be separate from each other and independently run their own department of government. Madison stressed this ideal throughout the first portion of the document because he believed that it should be an equal power balance between the three. No member of a branch should rule over another…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    UNIT III APUSH STUDY GUIDE

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Virginia delegate James Madison's plan of government, in which states got a number of representatives in Congress based on their population…

    • 3331 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist No 10 was an essay written by James Madison and published through many news papers along with many others for the decision to have the United States Constitution ratified. Madison believed that the constitution formed a government that was in enough power to do away with the chaos caused by groups of people known as factions. In Madison's terms factions were people who gathered together to protect and promote their special economic interest and political opinions.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As soon as the Americans first broke away from Britain, they wanted their government to not resemble Britain’s at all. By doing this, they adopted the Articles of Confederation that had no national executive branch. However, because the government under the Articles of Confederation had about no power because it couldn’t raise money through taxes, the people who led the national government came to realize that a more centralized government was needed. As the constitution was written and it was in the process of being ratified by all the states, the federalist papers written mostly by Alexander Hamilton were written. In one paper by James Madison, he writes “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition” (Doc I), which shows the concept of checks and balances could be used to keep the national government in line and controlled. The Constitution, finally ratified, was similar to Britain’s government but also different in its more active system of checks and balances.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson’s inauguration in 1800 lead to the defeat of the Federalists and the resurrection of republican control. The Judiciary Act of 1801 expanded and packed the Judicial branch with Federalists. The case of Marbury v. Madison (1803) led to the creation of judicial review, which allowed the Supreme Court to rule previous decisions unconstitutional and go against them. Jefferson strengthened forces in the Mississippi through Lewis and Clark’s expedition during his first term. Napoleon also offered him the whole of Louisiana, doubling the size of the United States for $15 million. American trade flourished from 1793-1807. The Chesapeake Incident in June 1807 ceased trade with the British after an attack on an American ship. In place of a declaration of war, the Embargo Act of 1807 was proposed, forbidding trade with any nation.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the Constitution while Federalists, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part of what separated the two parties from one another, Jefferson and Madison are both guilty of not adhering to these ideas on many occasions. Jefferson writes in a letter to Gideon Granger expressing his idea that the United States is too large to have only one central government, and the states should receive more power, which goes against the fact that the Constitution was created in order to unite a new country. Also, when passing the Embargo Act, Jefferson demonstrates the federal power over the people, which goes against his Republican belief of allowing the states to have more power. As Madison prepares for his term in office, the citizens of the United States were most likely expecting him to be more open to suggestion in his interpretations of the Constitution. However, during a speech by Daniel Webster, a Federalist speaking on behalf of the entire Federalist Party, and a veto on internal improvements, Madison proves that he truly is not a loose constructionist as his party would have preferred him to be. Both Madison and Jefferson are guilty of frequently going against the general ideas of their parties in order to meet their needs at a certain time.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As his friend, Jefferson, had done in the presidential term before him, Madison would have to lean towards a strong central government in order for the United States to prosper. As the Indians continued to receive help from the British, the embargo was placed on Britain, impressments of American merchant ships were out of control, and the war hawks expressed their desirability to go to war, war was seemingly unavoidable. His power enabled Congress to regulate commerce and equalize tariffs on the whole United States. He did this because as unorganized states regulated commerce, the nation was financially struggling. Plus, the loss of British trade was weakening the US greatly; a strong central government was needed. Unfortunately, Madison's decision to give more power to the federal government was not seen beneficial to all: "Their principle now is old Federalism, vamped up into something bearing the superficial appearance of republicanism…for this government created and gave power to Congress to regulate commerce and equalize duties on the whole of the United States, and not to lay a duty but with a steady eye to revenue…"(Doc F). Many Democratic-republicans questioned both Madison and Jefferson's decisions for a strong central government. However, the effects of war were primarily positive, which would highlight…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays