Comparing Kant's Philosophy And Antinomy

Kant, realized that questions about the world led directly to contradictory and rigorously proven assertions. Indeed, when reason discourses on the world, or more precisely, when it seeks the unity of the phenomena of the world, it naturally produces two opposing theses since both can be demonstrated by proofs that are as which it is likely to believe, because they can be demonstrated equally. Theses and antitheses seem necessary, as they impose themselves and are both contradictory and demonstrated. Cosmological ideas fall under the influence of two rival adversaries. On one hand, we always find a rational metaphysical thesis and, on the other, an empirico-skeptical antithesis. It is the discovery of antimony that leads Kant to the Critique, in order to take a stand on the scandal of
By refusing to admit a single causality to explain the series of phenomena, that of the laws of nature, reason is created the idea of an absolute spontaneity which begins to act of itself, a transcendental freedom. The thesis of the third antinomy states that there must necessarily exist in the world, in addition to natural causes, a free causality. However, the antithesis, meanwhile, the possibility of free act, is only an illusion that from our mind since the world universally obey to a certain rigorous determinism. Thus, there exists in the world only natural causes; a free causality therefore seems an impossible thing. The thesis proves itself by refuting the antithesis and showing that if everything happens by following the simple laws of nature, then there is always a sort of second start, but never a first. The antithesis proves itself by showing the absurdity of the these. And is also endowed with an implacable argument by reminding the thesis of a cosmological problem that arises at the level of the third antinomy in which the idea of liberty, is demanded through the research of an explication of the phenomas in the world, which