Preview

God Knows The Ethical Decisions We Will Make Med

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2022 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
God Knows The Ethical Decisions We Will Make Med
“God Knows the Ethical decisions we will make” Discuss [35]

The question over the existence of free will has raged on over many years. Many feel that God, saw an omniscient being, must be aware of all that has happened and all that will happen. Supporters of the cosmological argument would suggest that everything has a cause and that god was the initial cause, “the unmoved mover” (Tomas Aquinus), this would support the idea that humanity has no free will as everything is pre determined. This highlights the idea that humanity is not free, and even when we think we have a choice our actions have already been determined.
Free will is the concept that humanity has the ability to make their own choices, this suggests that humanity has a moral understanding that is inherent and God given. Some people argue that you are born with this morality and it does not develop. Christians would argue that this morality is god given, and that we merely develop it through our upbringing. If Christians accept the concept of God, then it is necessary that they view God as omniscient, this would suggest he knows everything we have done and everything we will do, thus taking away free will. However, many Christians take the view that god gave us free will after he cast Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden. In this way moral responsibility can exist and there can be a differentiation between a person who acts morally and immorally because there is now the option of choice.
Libertarians would agree with this idea, suggesting we always have a choice. Christian Libertarians argue that God simply offers moral guidance but allows us to behave in the way we want to. Libertarianism is the theory that humans do have genuine freedom to make a morally undetermined decision, although our behaviour may be partially determined by external factors. Libertarianism is the view that when faced with the choice between right and wrong we do act as free agents. Generally libertarianists

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    were given a questionnaire to view their “general satisfaction” (Tierney 2). Tierney claimed that people who believe in free will “scored better job ratings” (Tierney 2). This proves that believing in free will can lead to a more ethical society through believing that a person has control on their actions. In other words, a teenager would understand that stealing is wrong; therefore, he knows that it’s his choice to steal. In the back of the teenagers head, he has to think of the consequences. This proves that when a person believes that he has free will, he is more likely to think of…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about how Christians think about determinism and free will many people think Christians would side with determinism. However, in the article “Free will and Determinism as it Relates to Christian Apologetics” by Joel Furches explains Christians believe in…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    SyllabusIP

    • 1163 Words
    • 3 Pages

    free will or is everything a matter of causal necessity?” or “Is there a God or an afterlife?”…

    • 1163 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The power of acting without the constraint of necessity or fate; the ability to act at one's own discretion is the official definition of free will. With free will, God gave us the choice to do whatever we want. With the devil tempting us, we are more inclined to choose evil over bad, but with God’s influence we choose good. Plus if humans were naturally evil everything we know about God is a lie. There are people who believe that the bible states that humans are born evil, however, it does not mentions the word evil. The bible states that humans are all born with original sin, the tendency to sin innate in all human beings, held to be inherited from Adam in consequence of the Fall. Because of free will and moral standards we choose what we know is right, deep in our hearts, human beings fear God ,therefore, it is in our nature to please…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Libertarians support the view that people have free will and so we are free to make moral decisions. For a Libertarian, the key evidence for this is the act of decision making in our daily lives. Hume states that “experience is what we see to be true”, each human being experiences the feeling of being free to make a decision. If experiencing any other action constitutes it to be true, then why not the same for free will? Libertarians argue that we have awareness of the choices we make; we can choose to do anything that we are capable of. Though we are influenced by our environment and experiences, ultimately we can make our own decisions, nothing is inevitable or determined. Libertarians hold the belief of a moral self; humans want to want to do things. For example, a smoker may think it would be a good idea to give up smoking, but their addiction is too strong for them to think it possible or in any way likely; they want to want to give up smoking. Humans are unique in this way and it is this which is called the moral self. Libertarians are dualists believing that the human mind is separate from the physical world. It is because of this that our reason and autonomy, our moral self, can transcend over other causal determinants. Kant argues that by applying reason to decisions we can escape any authority from cause and effect or desires and emotions, we are the agents of our own decisions. Libertarians believe in a forking path of choices rather than the straight road of determinism.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although the “free will” problem envelops a spectrum of ideas, I agree with the following belief: “The folk are compatibilists about free will.” While there are, of course, incompatibilists and indeterminists, for the most part, the general population consists of compatibilists. Now, I know experimental philosophy has a problem with the use of generalizations without actual statistics, but throughout this paper, I will explain exactly why the world revolves in a generally compatibilist manner.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Free Will In The Odyssey

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What is the nature of free will? Are gods or humans responsible for what happens?…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will discuss if freewill is compatible with determinism. The concepts surrounding free will and determinism will be examined. The concepts are: incompatibalism, compatibalism, moral responsibility and libertarianism. Each concept has sub categories falling under the titles of hard or soft depending on the views. I will argue that freewill is compatible with determinism as there are certain things that are determined by physical process’s stemming from the formation of the universe resulting in the formation of the “laws of nature.”…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Calvinism and Arminianism are two different systems of theology that attempt to explain the relationship between God’s sovereignty and man’s free will. What differentiates these views is the issue of free will and whether people have any as compared to God’s will. Some people claim that God’s will supersedes human will in all situations if God’s will is different. On the other hand, some people claim God created man with free will and He would not intervene. However, there are those who do not believe man was created with free will and the sovereignty of God causes everything to occur. The Scripture teaches both the sovereignty of God and the free will of man. It appears unconditional in some places and conditional in other. Although, both systems are based on the Word of God, and both contain truth, neither system can be substituted for reading and believing the Word of God.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘There seems to be a considerable contradiction and inconsistency between God’s foreknowledge and the existence of free will.’ (Boethius).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally believe that we as human beings are given free will. For instance, lets say there is an all omniscient God and lets say he knows what we will do and what our destiny is but he sends you a problem to over come such as,…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Determinism and Sartre

    • 3716 Words
    • 15 Pages

    We do not live our lives in despair, constantly worrying about what may happen unexpectedly. For many people, life does seem like something that we control handedly. Life seems to be something we can direct, or at least influence. Supposing there are circumstances beyond our control, they rarely seem to present us a problem; we live contently believing that we are at least partly responsible for our fates. Seldom do we question the truth in this, of whether or not we have some say in the direction of our lives. Some would argue this is not so. Some of these people would happen to look at a deity or hard sciences to lead us to a cogent determined purpose. The fact remains that whether or not purpose lies in causality, a chain of events full of causes and effects may be explained perfectly if we had the knowledge. Determinists would argue that our free will is simply an illusion and we are deluding ourselves if we believe we have control. Sartre would argue that even the most seemingly random of occurrences are in fact entirely our fault; no matter what we do, who we talk to, and regardless of the circumstances, everything happens because it is our will because in some way or another our choices have allowed the event to happen. Each side of the debate has its merits and each side its flaws. As such, it becomes particularly difficult to choose between one and the other. I think that such a choice is not necessary. Though the choices seem at first to mark a dichotomy, they are in fact quite compatible with the truth of the matter lying somewhere in between. We do have choice; however, this choice is only between limited options, as determined by both the mental and physical worlds.…

    • 3716 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Schopenhauer On Free Will

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I believe most people have some sort of consensus to what free will is; the ability to make choices. Free will cannot be simplified down to a single absolute definition because in this age, we don’t entirely know why or how we make these decisions. To my beliefs, free will is the sense where individuals can consciously think for themselves on what they want to do, whether that is getting the fish instead of chicken for dinner or deciding to run for president. Even though we have the option to always make the right decision, we often make the wrong one. This agrees with the principle that we do not have free will, because if we did have the ability to make our own choices, we would always make the right one.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traditionally, God has been conceived as possessing the property of omniscience, or perfect and infinite knowledge. His omniscience covers all events – past, present, and future. However, this presents a potential problem for the argument that humans have free will. If God has knowledge of all future actions performed by agents, then in what sense do agents have genuine choice? If God already knows the outcome of every agent's choice, then it seems that no agents are truly free to make choices other than those that they actually do. Alternatively, if agents are genuinely free then it seems that God cannot have prior knowledge of how they will act. This could threaten the status of God's omniscience. The knowledge of what free agents would do…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays