Preview

Free Will Vs Determinism Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1475 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Free Will Vs Determinism Essay
The Controversy Between Determinism and Free Will Determinism is a controversial topic to free will with multiple theories proving and disproving it. As printed in The Collins Cobuild Learner's Dictionary, determinism is defined as “...the belief that all actions and events result from other actions, events, or situations, so people cannot in fact choose what to do.” Meaning, all life choices are predetermined from the minute we are born, to the minute we die. In contrast, “freewill is an individual taking control and responsibility for his/her actions according to his personal will” (Freewill Verses Determinism). People who believe in Free will, accept the idea that life is not predetermined, and they can independently act however they see fit. Free will and determinism can be further simplified and have multiple differences as well as similarities. Determinism can be broken down into two major groups. …show more content…
Hard determinists believe that every event has a cause, therefore, no one can act freely. In the video, Free Will and Determinism, the speaker states that society, upbringing, culture, and environment all play key roles as to how we feel emotionally. These four concepts interfere with our lives, and establish our actions. In addition, Honderich offers, “It is not merely a chance [External situations that may occur] or random event.” Hard determinists believe we have unknown forces acting upon us that cause us to act in a certain way. Everything that happens to us has already been mapped out and we are forced to live the life we have been given. In contrast, soft determinist believe that every event has a cause.This results in the person being free (Vaughn, Lewis, and Theodore Schick, Jr.). As described in the video, Freewill and Determinism, soft determinists believe in two types of causes: internal causes and external causes.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One of the main questions that we face is whether or not, we as humans have genuine freedom. Are we free to make our own choices? Do we decide what happens in our lives in the future? Or are our lives set pathways in which we have no say at all? Are all our choices already decided? In other words, do we have free will or are our actions pre-determined, or both? Hard determinists, libertarians and soft determinists all set out to provide answers to these questions, holding different views on whether or not free will and determinism are compatible. Both hard determinists and libertarians believe that free will and determinism are incompatible but hard determinists reject the idea of free will whereas libertarians support the idea of free will and reject determinism. On the other hand, soft determinists believe that free will and determinism are in fact compatible.…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate between freewill and determinism stems from the apparent conflict between the universal rule of causality that is deeply rooted in nature, and between the apparent ability of human beings to choose between multiple courses of action in order to lead to the most desirable outcome. The universal rule of causality simply claims that inorganic matter such as tables, chairs and rocks are acted upon by whatever forces affect it, however, human beings seem to be an exception to this rule by their unique ability to ponder about how to go about making decisions in their life and which…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines philosophical determinism as “the belief that all events are caused by things that happened before them and that people have no real ability to make choices or control what happens; a theory or doctrine that acts of the will, occurrences in nature, or social or psychological phenomena are causally determined by preceding events or natural laws; a belief in predestination, the quality or state of being determined” (1). Does this mean that whatever action we make is a choice that doesn’t belong to us, but is rather a result of complex events that surround us? Do people have a right to justify some of their actions, and can be excused due to an idea that they do not act voluntarily?…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Determinism argues that every event is causally determined. For an event ‘A’ to occur casually means that there are antecedent causes that ensure the occurrence of ‘A’ in accordance with impersonal, mechanical causal laws. To clarify hard determinism further, let me present hard determinism as an argument. Basically hard determinism argues that: (a) Determinism is true (b) Determinism is incompatible with free will (Holbach, 451). In defense of premise (a), the hard determinist says that obviously everything is caused, therefore determinism is true. To prove that determinism is false, the opponent would have to come up with an example of an uncaused event. To defend premise (b), the hard determinist would say that no action is free if it must occur. Human actions result from wants, desires, motivations, feelings, etc. The human wants, desires, motivations, feelings, etc are caused by specific antecedent conditions that ensure their occurrence. Therefore, human actions are not free.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gary Gutting, the author of the article, What Makes Free Will Free? deliberates that we do not have free choice as we assumed which a researcher confirmed. By free choice, this means the conviction that our conduct is dictated by our own unrestrained choice and that we have complete power over our activities. Also, Gary Gutting examined various thoughts on determinism as the researchers suggested. Determinism refers to the conviction that all human conduct or any other occurrences have a cause. This is opposed to a person's will to accomplish an action. Gary Gutting discussed what David Hume, a philosopher, believed and the belief of David Hume is that both determinism and free choice are possible, they are compatible with each…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that free will is true in saying, the idea that humans can freely choose their actions rather than all our lives being predetermined like the way determinist believe. Determinist think free will is just simply an illusion, and that our thoughts come from our background, and we are unaware as to which we strive no conscious control. As Sam Harris philosopher, claims that our thoughts and desires impose instinctive circumstances that define the character of your consciousness in that moment.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hard Determinism

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hard determinists hold that if every human action is caused then humans cannot have free will in regards to the choices that we make. Determinism and free will are incompatible theories. If humans have free will then they have the power to properly choose between two actions as an extension of their will; they must to be able to do or choose the reciprocal with equal ability. Hard determinism does not argue that we do not make choices; no hard determinist would refute this obvious fact. But they bring to question whether our reasoning behind the choices is free will, or causally…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Soft Determinism

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Determinism currently takes two related forms: hard determinism and soft determinism [1][1]. Hard determinism claims that the human personality is subject to, and a product of, natural forces. All of our choices can be accounted for by reference to environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary (biological) causes. Our total character is a product of these environmental, social, cultural, physiological and hereditary forces, thus our beliefs, desires, values and habits are all outside of our control. The hard determinist, therefore, claims that our choices are determined by these factors; free will is an illusion because the choices and decisions we make are derived from our character, which is completely out of our control in creating. An example might help illustrate this point. Consider a man who has just repeatedly stabbed another man outside of a bar; the other man is dead. The hard determinist would argue that there were factors outside of the killer's control which led him to this action. As a child, he was constantly beaten by his father and was the object of ridicule and contempt of his classmates. This trend of hard luck would continue all his life. Coupled with the fact that he has a gene that has been identified with male aggression, he could not control himself when he pulled the knife out and started stabbing the other man. All this aggression, and all this history were the determinate cause of his action.…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freewill Vs. Determinism

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, one possible outcome is you if believe you have one choice but, you only have outcome. So, when you think of freewill it is incompatible with determinism. Freewill tend to be illusion we think were free but were not. Determinism tend to be that everything we do is cause.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causal Determinist

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the reading, Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, we learned that we have no control over our behaviors because they are made up of our beliefs and desires, which are influenced by our genes and environment. For instance in the reading we are compared to a computer, our behavior is the result of your beliefs and desires just as a computer’s behavior is the result of its programming (Sober). The program within the computer is our genetic code. Then a hard determinist would create this argument, P1) Free choices require that the agent can choose from more than one possible option. P2) Our…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Various philosophers have explained iterations of free will in more depth, resulting in a greater number of issues connected to it. When arguing against free will, the concept of determinism is advanced as the main argument. Determinism is the philosophical idea that every event or state of affairs, including every human decision, and action, is predetermined. The main perceived threats to our freedom of will are various alleged determinisms. These can be physical, psychological, biological or theological in nature. For example, suppose you meet a person you are instantly attracted to. Practically every thought and emotion in your body commands you to approach the person but for various reasons you hold back; the moment doesn't feel right.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most people, if asked, would like true freedom of choice, proper free will, but can we really have it? This defines the idea of freewill, freewill is similar to the idea of moral responsibility; to satisfy the metaphysical requirement of being responsible for one's action. Free will is the ability to select a course of action and being able to fulfill one’s desire. But more complex than that, it allows people to have a choice in what power they want to hold in this world. Determinism vs freewill poses the question of how humans hold power in our world.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinism

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Sider and Conee, determinism conflicts with the concept of free will. Since all events have single or multiple causes and are also caused by a prior event, the existence of free will is questioned. If a person woke up one day and felt energized, there would be a reason as to why he woke up that way and not any other way. Perhaps the reason would be that he had 12 hours of sleep, or that he woke up to a bright, sunny day. Determinism tells us that not only is there a reason why he woke up well rested, there is also a reason why he had 12 hours of sleep, such that it creates a chain of causes that leads to a time before his birth. On the contrary, if he woke up cranky, there would be a different cause, but it would still be a cause to answer why he woke up on the wrong side of the bed. This chain of causes gives him no other choice but to wake up and feel energized that day, proving that determinism and free will conflict with each other.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While there are several different viewpoints of free will in philosophy, the main theories are hard determinist, libertarians, and compatibilism. Determinism is the idea that every action you take is heavily influenced by outside forces and past events. A hard determinist has the belief that that people have no free will and therefore no one is responsible for their actions because they were predetermined. Conversely, people with libertarian views of free will believes that our choices are entirely our own and we are not bound by a determined future. Compatibilism is like determinism but with the belief that people do in fact have free will but those choices are largely influenced by past events and outside forces.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The metaphysical issue on free will is, perhaps, one of the most controversial issues in the philosophical world. There are three main positions that philosophers have taken on the free will debate. The first, and possibly the most supported position, is Determinism. Determinism argues that human actions are causally determined by pervious conditions or events. This theory also concluded that, because all actions are predetermined by pervious conditions and the laws of nature, then people do not act freely and are not responsible for their actions. This theory was supported by both Scientist, Sir Isaac Newton, and mathematician, Pierre Simon, Marquis de Laplace, because it followed the laws of nature. Philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre rejected this…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays