According to Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, by Sober, it mentions three views of freedom: hard determinism, libertarian, and soft determinism. Being a hard determinist means you do not have free will, an incompatibilist, and causal determinist. Libertarians are free and incompatibilist; soft determinist are people that say that we do have free will and are causal determinism. An incompatibilist has many options and is free to pick any one of the choices. A causal determinist is when events turn out the same even if you go back in time. In this essay I am going to argue that we should be hard determinist because we do not have free will to choose our genes and environment.
In the reading, Freedom, Determinism, and Causality, we learned that we have no control over our behaviors because they are made up of our beliefs and desires, which are influenced by our genes and environment. For instance in the reading we are compared to a computer, our behavior is the result of your beliefs and desires just as a computer’s behavior is the result of its programming (Sober). The program within the computer is our genetic code. Then a hard determinist would create this argument, P1) Free choices require that the agent can choose from more than one possible option. P2) Our …show more content…
Free action is when an action is free if there are at least two open, possible options that one could choose, in other words, one could have done otherwise (Wright, 2015a). Even though we say that have free action, the outcomes will still be the same after all the events have occurred and if you rewind the time and replay it, the events will still take place in the same chronological order due to the present physical state of the universe and the laws of nature (Wright,