Comparing Marx, Mill's Views On Social And Political Conditions
In the present social and political conditions, theorists like Marx, Mills and Nietzsche have presented different understanding on individuals and conformity. All three theorists have offered varied responses regarding the rules we conform to today that are outdated and have lost meaning. For example, same sex marriage laws which are illegal in some developing countries can be viewed as meaningless. Mills developed his theories on these kind of laws. At the time the laws were set, they had justified meaning to the particular society then because the authority was strong but now they lost their meaning because the authority is weak (Edel, 1997). People will always comply with conventional demands of the society to actually fit in organised
…show more content…
According to Mills, this way of conformity limits our individuality. He suggests that everyone should follow the rules of Utilitarianism that derive intellectual happiness. This is because they maximise and increase everyone's pleasure and intellectual needs and are useful for survival. Mills claims that intellectual pleasures are better in nature and he advocated for women rights to vote in society, freedom of expression and the right to divorce. He thought everyone should have access to these intellectual pleasures in order for everyone to exercise their political beliefs and many are less controversial. Mills claims that the old rules which didn't make sense were based on pleasure (Mill, On Liberty, Chapter 4). These rules are animalist and are just based on power. Some pleasures are valuable than others and can be determined by individuals who are "equally capable of appreciating and enjoying both" (Mill, On Liberty, chapter 4). For instance, learning is a unique superior pleasure that the society has conformed to that brings long lasting effects for everyone. This is because it connects with individual's stored pleasure in the memory, diversifying, multiplying and re-creates new ideas that outer senses cannot give. The individual is taking steps towards development of individuality. It can be justified that Mills was a true classical liberal thinker. He advocates for civil liberties under the law which emphasis on economic
According to Mills, this way of conformity limits our individuality. He suggests that everyone should follow the rules of Utilitarianism that derive intellectual happiness. This is because they maximise and increase everyone's pleasure and intellectual needs and are useful for survival. Mills claims that intellectual pleasures are better in nature and he advocated for women rights to vote in society, freedom of expression and the right to divorce. He thought everyone should have access to these intellectual pleasures in order for everyone to exercise their political beliefs and many are less controversial. Mills claims that the old rules which didn't make sense were based on pleasure (Mill, On Liberty, Chapter 4). These rules are animalist and are just based on power. Some pleasures are valuable than others and can be determined by individuals who are "equally capable of appreciating and enjoying both" (Mill, On Liberty, chapter 4). For instance, learning is a unique superior pleasure that the society has conformed to that brings long lasting effects for everyone. This is because it connects with individual's stored pleasure in the memory, diversifying, multiplying and re-creates new ideas that outer senses cannot give. The individual is taking steps towards development of individuality. It can be justified that Mills was a true classical liberal thinker. He advocates for civil liberties under the law which emphasis on economic