Preview

Comparing Parliamentary and Presidential Systems of Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Parliamentary and Presidential Systems of Government
2. Compare and Contrast a parliamentary system a presidential system, analyzing their strengths and weaknesses. Use specific examples. Do you think one system is more or less “democratic”. Why? Which system do you prefer? Why? In a parliamentary system of government the head of state (usually called a prime minister) is the head of the party with the majority of legislative representation. That is, unless one party fails to win a majority of the legislative seats or 50%+1. In that case the party with the highest percentage of legislatures attempts to form a coalition government by promising members of lesser parties a role in the government in turn for their support. This is done until that group has 50%+1 legislators backing the head of state. In a presidential system the head of state (the president) and the legislative branch of the government are elected independently. The winner in both the legislative and executive elections is decided in a “first-by the-post” fashion. In laymen terms the candidate with the highest number of votes wins. The strength of a parliamentary system is that the executive and most powerful party in the legislature are always in agreement. As a result of the guaranteed agreement more legislation is likely to pass and changes in policy are enacted swiftly, political party’s are forced to enact policy that they promised when they were elected.. The availability of swift change could also be seen as a weakness as well because it could lead to more uncertainty within the country regarding taxation changes, federal funding, and governmental programs. An example of swift change is in England where the conservative party now has formed a coalition government with the liberal democrats (in most cases the lesser parties in a coalition government just have token powers, like heading legislative committees). The conservative government was elected on a platform of spending cuts, deficit reduction, and taxation reform. While holding power

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, Cabinets still hold an enormous amount of power over their Prime Minister. Prime Ministers require the support of their ministers or they risk a party revolution and replacement. For example, Margaret Thatcher lost the support of her Cabinet in her third term and was eventually replaced by John Major. This shows how much power Cabinet can wield over Prime Ministers. Also, the Prime Minister’s power is linked to the backing of the so-called ‘unsackable’ ministers in Cabinet. These ‘unsackable’ ministers are ‘unsackable’ as they have their own little faction in the party behind them to support them in any issue over their ability. For example, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown did not have the best personal relationship but Gordon Brown had…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each state, by use of electors will vote for the president in the general election. Each state's legislature will determine how that state will provide electors. This system prevents large population areas from controlling the presidential…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly the PM proves that he has dominance through the power of patronage. The PM has the power to appoint ministers, Bishops and, in theory, can dissolve parliament and call elections. This means that, for the benefit of their parties’ ideology the PM can choose those who are loyal to him/her which makes them look stronger. The PM also has the power of royal Prerogative. There are PMs who have taken the power of patronage to their advantage like Gordon Brown who Fired 11 members of his old cabinet. Having the power of patronage mean he can change his cabinet to make it more to his liking. Also having the power of patronage means that the PM can give bonuses and promote back benches, making them less likely to rebel and support the choice that the pm makes. This shows that the pm dominates the system as they have the decision to have certain mps in their government, having loyal members makes him/her look stronger and more popular within his/hers own party. However there are limits and conditions to the power of patronage.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historically, the Prime Minister is head of government, chief policy maker, and party leader. The power of the Prime Minister included the appointment and the reshuffle of the Cabinet, power of dissolution, and other prerogative powers like Honor recommendations. The…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Safe State vs. Swing State

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the voting world, the president is decided through representative votes by the states. This is called the…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    III. Is Representative Democracy Best?A. For a representative democracy government to work their must be:i. A opportunity for genuine leadership competition1. individuals and parties be able to run for office2. free communication 3. voters perceive that meaningful choices existii. Guidelines for fair leadership campaigns.B. Framers of the constitution -i. Thought that representative democracy was best because -1. less chances of it offices being manipulated2. help prevent political offices being used for private gain3. reduce the need for constant pollsii. Set up government to protect -1. Civil rights of all people2. Minorities 3. From concentration placement of power. IV. How is Power Distributed in a Democracy?A. Elitei. Persons who possess…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many systems of governments that can be classified into different types. Some of them being common amongst countries and some of them not so much. The two main organizations and/or alternatives that are most familiar are the presidential systems and the parliamentary systems. Various distinctions between these two types of systems can be distinguished. In a presidential system, the president is set apart from the legislative branch where as in the parliamentary system the chief executive (prime minister) is part of the legislative branch (the parliament).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the U.S. political system, the president is the official head of state. The president is elected under the electoral college system. In the U.K., although the prime minister usually has the spotlight on political matters and is the official head of government, the queen or king is the official head of state. The queen officially signs off on acts of parliament and, just as the U.S. president delivers the State of the Union Address every year, the queen reads the "Speech from the Throne," which is written by the prime minister. In U.K, the monarch is more of a…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    And it is that sense of individuality that leads to the second main difference between the two. In a parliamentary government, the Prime Minister and his cabinet (The leaders of the nation) are chosen from the majority party in the country's parliament. Thus, if the members of that party begin voting against their party's ideals in the body, the entire government can come apart, forcing an election of a new Prime Minister. With this in place, many parties very carefully restrict the freedoms of their delegates to ensure the safety of their Prime Ministers. In a congress, however, the executive branch…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparisons between different forms of government and their respective advantages and disadvantages have been made throughout history, and will continue to be relevant. Aristotle famously compared forms of government based on two main criteria: how many people hold power, and who’s interests are they serving (Wikipedia, 2018).…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparitive Politics

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The American Presidential system is a uniquely fantastic structure that is ran by three equally important mechanisms. These mechanisms are the three branches of American Government which are: Legislative, Executive, and the Judicial branch. The Executive branch is ran by the President of the United States commonly referred to as the Chief Executive. The President has to be separate from the Legislative branch due to the separation of powers. The separation of powers were formed in of America’s most early documents, The Constitution. Article 1 of the Constitution lists that congress may only possess legislative powers; Article 1 Section 8 displays what particular powers congress wields and Section 9 narrates what Congress may not do. Article 11 states the role of Executive power upon the President of The United States of America known as the “vesting clause”. Article 111 lists states the privileges of the Judicial Branch. That is the American government’s three branches in a nutshell.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A president serves as the head of state and a prime minister is the head of government. After governmental elections, the leader of the majority party is normally elected prime minister by the assembly. The president is chosen to a four year time by popular vote. Local government leaders are selected at the aimag (provincial) and soum (district) levels.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presidential System

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A presidential system is a system of government where an executive branch is led by a person who serves as both head of state and head of government. That person is usually elected and titled "president", but can also be an unelected monarch.[citation needed] In a presidential system, the executive branch exists separately from the legislature, to which it is not responsible and which cannot, in normal circumstances, dismiss it.[1]…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The author claims that president with limited political power should appointed by the prime minister and an opposition leader, and confirmed by majority of the parliament member as Australia does. In this case the author does not highlight is it better for one party system or multi-party system countries. In the first case, selecting the head of the state is doubtful without opposition and popular vote. It may involve to the biased action of the party to appoint its representor. In the second case, it depends on collaboration of the parties and political literacy of the party…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A presidential system is a system of government where an executive branch is led by a president who serves as both head of state and head of government.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays