Preview

Comparing Suarez's Obligation, Rightness And Natural Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Suarez's Obligation, Rightness And Natural Law
This perspective of Suarez as occupying an intermediate position between voluntarism and naturalism has been questioned by Terrence Irwin. In Obligation, rightness and natural law, Irwin places Suarez squarely in the voluntarist camp when it comes to moral obligation and moral law. Despite lending a greater degree of coherency to Suarez's position, I believe that Irwin is fundamentally mistaken for characterizing Suarez's philosophy as voluntarist. Most notably, the rhetorical move is mistaken for failing to recognize the degree of difference between Suarez's position and the moral voluntarists that preceded him. I will attack Irwin's position with the help of Thomas Pink's position that the characteristic force of obligation leaves us responsible for and open to blame. …show more content…
Reducing Suarez's position on law and obligation to mere voluntarism fails to do him justice. The content of the natural law is something that is created by nature itself, a position that voluntarists of the time would surely disagree with. I then go to show that, under the blame model, sinful acts are blameworthy and thus obligatory. I will first make the claim that this is more philosophically consistent than making a distinction between obligation and duty (as Irwin does). I will conclude by stating that Suarez's system can still be rendered comprehensible without this distinction. It is crucial to Suarez' legacy that his notion of obligation and law were equally influenced by naturalists, with obligation heavily relating to practical reason. We are given additional but important reasons to perform a given act when we are obliged

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    “Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Ciero's Problematic Legacy,” Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1999): 1-31.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Aldrich, Roy L. “Causes for Confusion of Law and Grace Confusion of Law and Grace.” Bibliotheca Sacra 463, no. Jul (1959): 222–229.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He continues to say that one “who escapes their burden of responsibility for their actions through an appeal to a supernatural belief as it is to avoid responsibility by claiming that one’s actions fall under natural law”.(279)…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural law is a law based upon the observations of natural occurrences. While moral action is the actions you chose to perform because they agree with your sense of right and wrong. In the way Natural law is presented to the majority of people is as a step by step guide to living a “good” life, in the eyes of god.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lenn Goodman Essay

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of this essay is to tell you what I think about an author name Lenn Goodman, the author of ‘”Some Moral Minima”. In this essay I will explain what Lenn states and argues that there are certain things that are simply wrong. And I will explain if agree with him or not.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Augustine’s theodicy is mostly influenced by the creation stories found in the Genesis. Augustine had a traditional view of God and thought God was omnipotent and good. The genesis mentions that everything God made was good, therefore the universe that God created is good. Augustine believed there were higher and lower goods but everything was good in its own way.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mackie’s ‘Ethics: Inventing right and wrong’ critically assesses the idea that there are, or even can be, objective moral truths, and exposits Mackie’s ‘moral relativist’ stance. I intend also in this essay to criticise the idea of moral objectivity, and to deal with the objections that could be potentially raised to a relativist stance.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke's concept of the social contract is to protect people's rights. According to Locke the contract is between the people and these branches of government that they set up. The reason government arises the social contract between people, is because that people want to live longer and better. The legitimacy of the government comes from the fact we consent to set up that authority and protect our natural rights. For example, if we designate a group of people as the executive power to enforce our law, in that case they will be part of the contract, and we contract them to do certain job since they are protected by the natural right. But if the executive power will abuse the system, by brutalize someone or be racist to them, then we will be able to remove them, and that's how rebellion and political change is built into Locke's system, which will be very important for a revolution.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first chapter; ‘The Law of Human Nature’ the author tells his reader how the law of nature is seen by today’s thinkers, and of older thinkers. That the law is not merely another natural law as to gravity is, but how it is more of a way of thinking. Showing how all people of a way of knowing how to act, for example when he had said “.. The human idea of decent behavior was obvious to everyone”. In this chapter he also talks about, how the natural law has much criticism and how some say it could not be true, because of different ages and civilizations have had different ideas about how to basically think and act. He disagrees with this claim because; despite where you come from you will always know what is real right and wrong.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pereboom agrees with Baruch Spinoza, who maintains that, in accordance with the nature of the universe, all human beings lack the sort of free will required to be praiseworthy for works of good or blameworthy for works of wrongdoing. That is, Pereboom agrees that all human beings lack the sort of free will required for moral responsibility. In this essay, Pereboom first attempts to argue in favour of hard incompatibilism by rejecting the logical alternatives, libertarianism and compatibilism. He then advances to demonstrate how hard incompatibilism can be compatible with both morality and life…

    • 2114 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    being: Christus Victor, Moral Influence and the Penal Substitution. I will be giving a brief over…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: the Conscience

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In his second essay of the Geneaology of Morals, Nietzsche attempts to identify and explain the origin of the conscience. He does not adopt the view of the conscience that is accepted by the “English Psychologists”, such as Bentham, J. Mill, J.S. Mill and Hume, as the result of an innate moral feeling. Rather, it is his belief that the moral content of our conscience is formed during childhood under the influence of society. Nietzsche defines the conscience as an introspective phenomenon brought about by a feeling of responsibility, in which one analyzes their own morality due to the internalization of the values of society. This definition holds the position that the conscience is not something innate to humans, rather it has arisen through evolution. In light of this, this paper will give insight into how Nietzsche reaches this conclusion, as well as what results from it. In order to do this there will be discussion of guilt, punishment, the will to power and implications from society.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Law Essay

    • 886 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A) Explain how a follower of Natural Law might approach the issues surrounding abortion. [25]…

    • 886 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Emanuel Kant

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The third proposition is that duties should be undertaken out of "reverence" for "the law." Any organism can act out of instinct. Chance events could bring about positive results. But only a rational being can recognize a…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although Aristotle did not use the term ‘natural law’ many medieval philosophers considered him as one of the first exponents of the fundamentals of natural law. Stoic philosophy was the first to introduce the term ‘natural law’ with the Stoics emphasising nature and the moral requirement to accept and conform to what is given in nature. This Greek philosophy spanned several centuries and greatly influenced the Roman philosopher Cicero. Cicero (d. 43BC) was a strong advocate of natural law and spoke of natural law as the innate power of reason to direct action. Catholic natural law theory was formulated by St. Thomas Aquinas over seven centuries ago. He identified one fundamental norm of natural law: do good and avoid evil. Doing good in this context is following reason’s lead to actualise human…

    • 2320 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays