Preview

Comparing Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, And Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, And Jean-Jacques Rousseau
1. State of nature, defined differently by all of us according to our own understanding, made lots of importance to English philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean Jacques Rousseau. In the state of nature, there is no above authority or government for everyone’s safety and peaceful living; everyone is in their own matter, and there in no unity of people even living in the same city. Every individual is judge of their own deeds. Strong individual is allowed to crush the weak in any or every way possible. According to few philosophers, having an authority above you keeps the society in peace; while, others think that being on your own makes everyone’s living better. In my opinion, having an authority to control the body of people, but giving equal freedom and rights to everyone, is the best way of keeping the society in peace.
According to Hobbes, no one is free, of fear, in state of nature. Since every …show more content…
According to Hobbes it is necessary to have a common wealth, because individuals in the state of nature are always in war with each others. According to Locke, individuals have freedom in the state of nature, and they get locked to everyone’s opinions if they are under a common wealth. Same as Locke, Rousseau also thinks that men are free in the state of nature. I like Hobbes’ beliefs, because having an authority above you, keeps you humane and provides equality to every individual. French Revolutionaries were influenced a lot by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau in the sense that their government system was improving through their ideas or theories. At the end, France ended up with the greatest leader in the history, Napoleon Bonaparte. He was superior above all, gave equal rights to the people under him, and proved that the man in the state of nature is not always in
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Revolutionary Leaders: Thomas Hobbes And John Locke
    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page

    Revolutionary Leaders: Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

    he founding fathers immerged from the British Colonists to become pillars in American history. The revolutionary leaders were immersed with knowledge of educational writings from scholars such as, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, among many more. The knowledge had an immense impact, on the foundations, principles and rights, the revolutionary leaders fought so passionately to establish.…

    • 185 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau

    Locke and Rousseau both believed in a form of direct democracy, including freedom, equality, and independence. One of Locke’s important philosophies was that people are born with a blank slate, the “Tabula Rasa”, so everyone deserves political respect from birth, but with bad actions such privileges can go away. Rousseau pushed for a social contract to govern society, which took away rights but promised safety. Also, they both valued the human mind much more than past rulers, hence why they set up many ways for citizens to express their own ideas in their government. By including their philosophies in the Enlightenment age it helped push more countries in Europe to become a direct…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing and Contrasting Thomas Hobbes and John Locke
    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing and Contrasting Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

    Hobbes and Locke did not have many of the same views on government. Though it is not directly stated in his text, most historians believe Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy. He believed the government should have absolute authority over all the citizens. He believed if such a government did not exist, we would live in a world of turmoil. The sovereign (government) has the obligation of keeping the peace and, when need be, national defense. The sovereign establishes all the laws, and has complete legislative,…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final
    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Phil 103 Final

    1D. The state of nature is Hobbes’ description of what human beings lived like prior to the existence of a state or civilized society. In this existence, all humans were equal in that they all wanted to achieve their ultimate end and they all had the right to do what they thought necessary for survival…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke

    Hobbes was a philosopher who saw humans as a purely physical being. He believed that all human actions can be explained through the motions in our bodies. According to Hobbes all feelings and emotions are a result of phantasms, our perception of the objects around us. This perception is a motion within our bodies and each person perceives these phantasms differently causing love, hate, desires, and what we think is good and bad. Every feeling that comes from ones perspective has a physical feeling, such as desires can cause certain pains and it is only human nature that one does whatever is needed in order to relieve those pains. Hobbes therefore sees humans as being able, by their state of nature, to take or do whatever necessary for themselves even if it shows no regard for the other people their actions may harm. This inevitably would end up in a fight for survival or “the war of all against all”. In order to prevent such a war from happening Hobbes thought it necessary that the individuals must promise each other to give up their right to govern themselves to the sovereign for the mutual benefit of the people. This sovereign then has absolute power to rule with no questions asked and not to only act on behalf of the citizens but to completely embody their will. In summation, Hobbes believed that society could only exist under power of the sovereign and that life in the state of nature is violent, short and brutish, as all men act on self-interest.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes State Of Nature Essay
    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes State Of Nature Essay

    It is a brutish and violent nature. In the absence of culture, arts, science, reading or writing, humans, possibly, are more related to animals, since animals also live in the state of nature, and who always fight for domination. This rather negative view is Hobbe’s main reason why there should be a government. There should be an authority to establish peace. In peace, numerous achievements can be obtained. In peace does humanity progress. It might be argued that Hobbes demands a despot, an autocracy. Still, is not that better than the state of nature? There might be many opposing arguments especially that of the anarchists, yet Hobbe’s examples might not be conquered because they are succinct and feasible. They are plausibly impregnable because they are factual, not idealist. Leviathan does convincingly argue, and this monster in the state of nature does devour…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx
    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Compare and Contrast the Philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, and Karl Marx

    In the idea of human nature; origin of state, the nature of government, the rights of regulation can be drawn as the reflection of insightful philosophies of John Locke, Thomas Hobbes and Karl Marx. By understanding this within the context of human nature, we can see their ideas play to how they perceive a modern philosophy. Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto illustrates the desire to build "a society without economic classes". John Locke's Political Theory claims the establishment of natural rights which will assist protest against unjust rulers. Thomas Hobbes's most famous publication, the "Leviathan" defines a government which unifies the collective will of many individual and unites them under the authority of sovereign power. Although the three philosophers desire the same result through their theories, its practices and use have indicated that there are difference and similarities both present. All are saying that there should be absolute government, but their areas of specialization are different.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Locke And Thomas Hobbes
    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Similarities Between Locke And Thomas Hobbes

    Thomas Hobbes was an absolute monarchist that believed human beings were organisms that were in constant motion, and needed to have some sort of authority or restraint, so they could be stopped from pursuing any selfish act. In contrast to John Locke were he believed in a democratic rule and constitutes that human nature was identified by reason and tolerance. The political ideology that Hobbes obtains is precise regarding the following points: people are naturally born with rights but must give up any right to the monarch so in return they receive protection, humans are naturally wicked, cruel, inhumane and selfish, no individual can be trusted to govern themselves and cannot maintain order, and the main purpose of a government body is to implement law and order. It is normal to be in a state of war knowing the reality of human nature, being in constant conflict amongst…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast John Locke and Thomas Hobbes
    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Compare and Contrast John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

    John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two main political philosophers during the seventeenth century. Hobbes is largely known for his writing of the “Leviathan”, and Locke for authoring "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding." Included in their essays, both men discuss the purpose and structure of government, natural law, and the characteristics of man in and out of the state of nature. The two men's opinion of man vary widely. Hobbes sees man as being evil, whereas Locke views man in a much more optimistic light. While in the state of nature and under natural law, they both agree that man is equal. However, their ideas of natural law differ greatly. Hobbes positions himself with the view that the state of nature is a state of war where every man is for himself and loyalty to another being will only bring dismay. Contrastingly, Locke sees natural law and the state of nature as a place of equality and freedom for all. Locke therefore believes that government is necessary in order to preserve natural law, and on the contrary, Hobbes sees government as necessary in order to control natural law.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes and Enlightenment Ideas
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes and Enlightenment Ideas

    Thomas Hobbes contribution was the suggestion that the social order was made by human beings and therefore could be changed by human beings. Hobbes looked on the individual as selfish, concerned with self-preservation, searching for power, and (potentially at least) at war with others. For Hobbes, in the state of nature, there was a war of all against all and life is nasty, brutish, and short. Since individuals are rational, they agree to surrender their individual rights to the sovereign in order to create a state whereby they can be protected from other individuals. Locke and Rousseau further developed this idea of a social contract, although in a somewhat different form than Hobbes.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Leviathan Lord Of The Flies Quote Analysis
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leviathan Lord Of The Flies Quote Analysis

    Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan speaks of a state of nature: a consequence of human nature where there are “no legal or moral limits, and the only limiting factor is ones’ own power” (Masroori). This is mankind living in a condition absent of government or authority, where right and wrong do not apply. In the state of nature what matters is surviving in a world where vulnerability breeds fear, and everyone is a possible threat. “One doesn’t know for how long he/she can stay alive. At any moment another individual can attack and can kill you. Fear of unexpected and violent death, that sudden, brutal death is terrorizing.” (Masroori). In order to survive, one must be always on their guard, suspicious of their…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes VS. Locke VS. Rousseau
    • 10874 Words
    • 44 Pages

    Hobbes VS. Locke VS. Rousseau

    “I am at the point of believing, that my labor will be as useless as the commonwealth of Plato. For Plato, also is of the opinion that it is impossible for the disorders of the state ever to be taken away until sovereigns be philosophers . . . I recover some hope that one time or other this writing of mine may fall into the hands of a sovereign who will consider it for himself, for it is short, and I think clear.”…

    • 10874 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    Two of the most influential political philosopher and social contract theorists of all time, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both used ‘The State of Nature’ as a medium in order to understand the basic human nature and natural human rights in their writings. Both, then used their own understanding of the human nature in order to determine and justify the ideal form of government, its role and its powers. However, Locke and Hobbes reach markedly different conclusions. Hobbes argues that every man should concede all of his natural rights to the government and allow it to assume absolute power, while Locke argues that man is entitled to keep his natural rights and a government body is required only in order to protect those certain natural rights.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy of Fear
    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosophy of Fear

    In the pure state of nature, all humans are of equal mind and body, meaning that no one has a distinct advantage or disadvantage against another. The state of nature is also referred to as the state of war in which every man will fight and try to protect what they deem as theirs. Thomas Hobbes, a seventeenth century philosopher, described this as bellum omnium contra onmes, meaning the war of all against all. Due to everyone attempting to fight everyone else to stay alive in a pure state of nature, societies and civilizations cannot form. So is there a way to keep the peace and let mankind develop into its full potential? Hobbes uses an idea of giving up individual powers to one person or an assembly of men as in the form of sovereignty. The sovereignty will be able enforce the peace with unlimited power. The sovereignty acquires these powers as individuals give up particular freedoms.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics