Preview

Comparing Thoreau's The Apology And Civil Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
300 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Thoreau's The Apology And Civil Disobedience
The Apology and Civil Disobedience are two famous literatures that depict the principles or basic premises of Socrates and Henry David Thoreau, respectively. The Apology, however was written by Plato based on his depiction of Socrates’ defense speech when he was put on trial for “corrupting the youth and impiety.” Principles found in Socrates’ speech to the men of Athens (jurors) can be compared and contrasted to principles of Henry David Thoreau which can be located in his essay, Civil Disobedience.
In Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, he says, “ The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right.” Both Socrates and Thoreau seem to agree with the principle that humans are obligated to do what they believe


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The essay Civil Disobedience, written by Henry David Thoreau has much to do with Thoreau’s own experiences than a general perception of people as a whole. Thoreau, a stellar student from Harvard believed one key idea: change begins with the individual. With this belief Thoreau in 1846 spoke out against the Mexican American War and slavery. His response resulted in the deliberate obliviousness to his taxes. In July of 1846 Thoreau was arrested for not paying his taxes and spent a night in Jail. During this time Thoreau wrote about the laws enforced by the government must be based on conscience rather than majority appeal.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and, Socrates hold altogether different assessments with regards to matters of obeying just laws and how unjust laws ought to be taken care of. I concur with Martin Luther King Jr's. way to deal with common defiance and I additionally agree that steps should be taken towards changing unjust laws. A nation's headway starts from the changing of laws – that is the delayed consequence of people going to stand up for what is right…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tim Dechristopher

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thoreau, a Harvard philosopher, wrote in 1849 an essay explaining himself, who spent a night in jail to protest taxes that funded the Mexican-American War. Likewise, Tim Dechristopher, an environmental activist in 2008, disrupted the bid for oil drilling leases, to hinder and protest the destruction of the environment. Thoreau explains his antithesis, “If [U.S. Citizens] pay the tax from a mistaken interest in the individual taxes, to save his property, or prevent his going to jail, it is because they have not considered wisely how far they let their private feelings interfere with the public good” (Thoreau 3, 10). Hence, he states that doing unjust and illegal activities is justifiable, if it boosts public welfare. Similarly, Dechristopher’s illegal act of fraud is justified in the New York Times article, “Activist said the sale would threaten Utah’s wild lands and spoil the view from some of the state’s spectacular national parks with drilling rigs” (Associated Press 11). As many environmental activists agree, the public welfare of the people relies on the health of the environment. Seeing Dechristopher verbally support his own act of civil disobedience, and in like manner, Thoreau justifying his act and accepting it, it is deducted that they are both embodiments of civil disobedience. If civil disobedience was construed, Thoreau and…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "Civil Disobediance", by Thoreau, Thoreau claims that there should be improvement from the government, and that people should fight for it. Thoreau uses paradox, and similes to convince his readers that they should take the initiative to speak up.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human law and government are subordinate and antagonists to each other. Thoreau proposes that in an instance when each odd is against one another, an individual must choose their own moral path instead of the government path if necessary. Thoreau explains that people are not put in this world to make it a better place to live in, rather than to simply live it. He then describes that it is not man’s duty to devote himself to the moral wrong. It is man’s duty to avoid the moral wrong. For instance, if the government tells you to either kill your family members or be sent to jail, it is your duty to obey your conscience. Furthermore, Thoreau explains that the majority is not always correct either and thus, do not accurately determine justice. Although government has a place in human existence, man must eventually follow his own moral decisions and disregard human…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, in his essay, civil disobedience, argues that when a person is not in comfort with the government, then we have a right as humans to act against its injustice. Thoreau supports his argument by first stating that unjust laws exist and that we shall endeavor to amend them instead of being content to obey them. His purpose is to inform the reader about the way they are being mistreated by government and to persuade them to act against their injustices in a civil disobedient way inn order to see the government acting up more rapidly and systematically. Thoreau establishes a critical and righteous tone for those who are against…

    • 2786 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is using nonviolent protest to boycott government in an attempt to influence the legislation to change the policy. Henry David Thoreau created a writing called "Civil Disobedience", talking about its meaning and how he had experienced civil disobedience. He had been sent to jail for not paying a poll-tax for six years (Thoreau par. 7). When he was released, he paid the tax; obeying the law, but had still thought that government is biased for making him pay it (McElroy par. 2). Wendy McElroy stated "He listened to the inner voice of his conscience, a voice all men possess but few men follow (McElroy par. 5). Thoreau listened to his belief and did not pay the tax because he did not believe it was something that he should have to do. Overall, Thoreau was a simple man who relied on nonviolent nature and his own beliefs to disobey the government and its laws. Thoreau would have recognized the Singing Revolution in Europe and the Kent State University protestors as significant acts of civil disobedience considering…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The main purpose of this article is to argue that change isn’t made through votes and discussions, but rather through actions. 2. The key question that the author is addressing is how we should stand up to the government. 3.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ralph Beachum

    • 3085 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Martin Luther king Jr. once said, “They will be the young high school and college students, the young ministers of the gospel and a host of their elders, courageously and non-violently sitting in at lunch counters and willingly going to jail for conscience sake.” Men follow their conscious until their perspective of conscience being is distorted. They often see the moral light but are side-tracked by the world at large. Ultimately, every man is a product of their surroundings; thus, they tend to assimilate to what they know. The conscience innovation is throbbing with potential, impetuous, once asserted; it can reconstruct the foundation of all statutes. In Thoreau’s, “Civil Disobedience”, and King’s, “A Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” there are direct references to the methods and reasons for civil disobedience; however, the backgrounds of these letters, although distant, converge from different settings.…

    • 3085 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thoreau uses tone and imagery to make his theme stronger in Civil Disobedience. He uses the rhetorical devices in a convincing matter.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Likewise, Emerson would spend life in prison then obeying law Against his nature. Emerson, a transcendentalist has stated that “ All I must do is all that concerns me, not what people think.”, judging superior of his beliefs over others opinions. He would rebel the law that goes against his beliefs, then conforming it, often resulting in prisonment, Which he would willingly accept because he takes decisions based on his conscience. He would fight and serve prisonment then obey law against his beliefs. Emerson tells us that “No laws can be sacred to me, but that of my nature.”…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    13,000 people died in the Mexican-American war. Is this what one considers a victory? In the essay, Civil Disobedience, by Henry David Thoreau, the author sets his opinion on the government (as well as their influence) in the Mexican-American War. This war was raged because the United States were seeking manifest destiny and they wanted part of Mexico’s land. The author, Thoreau, distastes the government as well as the power the government is given. The author furthermore believes the government was the initial cause of the Mexican-American war. To add, it is said that Thoreau did not pay his taxes because he believed that the money was supporting the war. Thoreau writes, in Civil Disobedience, “I heartily accept the motto ‘That government…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A free thinking society ought to exercise its right to think freely; without doing so, civilization halts at a precipice. For instance, Thoreau, in his argument for Civil Disobedience, argues that citizens simply…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau uses many examples of the logos, ethos and pathos appeals in his…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays