Henry David Thoreau uses many examples of the logos, ethos and pathos appeals in his essay titled “Civil Disobedience”. Thoreau’s ideals and opinions on the state of the government in 1849 are represented throughout his essay, and he uses logical reasoning, credible examples, and draws on the emotional appeals of his audience to represent his thesis.
Thoreau’s uses multiple analogies presenting logical appeal, or logos, throughout his essay. In particular, Thoreau compares the government to a standing army, “objections which have been brought about against a standing army, and there are many, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought about against a standing government” (Thoreau 1). Thoreau’s point is that our Constitution states that raising or having a standing army during times of peace is illegal and unconstitutional, so government should be as well. Thoreau uses logical reasoning to prove his opinion that government is useless and takes power away from citizens.
Thoreau uses credible evidence, ethos, to back up his thesis as well. An example of credible evidence is when Thoreau uses the Mexican war as an example of an “abused and perverted” government. Thoreau claims that the American citizens would not have wanted to engage in such an agressive war if government had not pushed the issue. He uses the war as an example of a domineering government when he states “witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for, in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure” (Thoreau 1).
Lastly, Thoreau draws on emotional appeals to further his point. He speaks on the immense quality of American character, and how the government has stood in the way of this character. Thoreau draws on emotional appeals when stating “the character inherent in the
American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes gotten in its way” (Thoreau 2). This is an example of the pathos appeal because Thoreau draws on the emotions of the American citizens by showing how the unjust government has shaped and obstructed the American character.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Thoreau applies rhetoric in his proclamation against the government, “It does not keep the country free. It does not…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Voice = textual features such as diction and syntax, that contribute to a writer’s persona Syntax and tone are formal, academic, eloquent. Sentences tend to be longer, complex sentences punctuated with frequent commas and semicolons (to indicate pauses) which lends the pacing of a speech, almost as if even though we’re reading a written word, it’s Thoreau himself speaking to us, lecturing even. Also, parallelism (more precisely in the following example, anaphora): Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished. (paragraph 2) (The last “It does not…” with the “The…American people has done” is antithesis) Diction is academic and intelligent, supporting the same tone mentioned above (“alacrity” is a lesser-known word for “speed”). Repeated use of the “machine” metaphor when referring to the government and politicians/lawyers who work for it. Sets up an “Us” (free-minded, free-thinking citizens who rebel against slavery) versus “Them” (the government machine and…
- 1570 Words
- 45 Pages
Powerful Essays -
One can argue that the Mexican-American was an unprovoked and unjustifiable war of aggression and territorial aggrandizement. It could also be argued that the war was not unprovoked nor was it territorial aggrandizement. Realistically the war provoked, justifiable, and not territorial aggrandizement. This notion is exemplified through the document provided.…
- 528 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” he describes his night in jail while he is also writing about the government. I strongly agree with Thoreau’s claim “That government is best which governs least.” to tell the readers that he feels that the government would be enhanced if it “governed” less. I agree because usually when a government is strict about everything and is in people's business and it easier to adapt to a government that does not put so much pressure on people in America. Another example would be a personal experience I had, when I was arrested for simply looking “suspicious” and i had failed to provide…
- 517 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Thoreau begins his essay by arguing that the government intervenes too much and it would be better if they were not involved at all. He believes men are too absent minded and do whatever the government says without thinking about their morals. Those who listen and follow the government are not wise and do not trust their conscience.…
- 351 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
-Thoreau prefers a “neutral” government, but he does not mean for the government to be set aside. Rather than that he “wants” a better government.…
- 272 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Henry David Thoreau wrote “Civil Disobedience”, in 1849, to explain his distrust for the government. He focuses greatly on how the government is actively working against the people. Thoreau also discusses all throughout his essay about how the ones who serve our country are not considered as important as the ones within the cabinet. In an excerpt from “Civil Disobedience”, Thoreau uses pathos to show how the government is corrupt by using strategic syntax, similes, and metaphors.…
- 502 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Individuals of good conscience should actively oppose unjust government policies through nonviolent resistance, such as refusal to pay taxes. If an individual felt that a law was unjust, he/she should then break it. According to Henry David Thoreau’s essay Civil Disobedience, the United States government back in the time of slavery, and the era of the Mexican War, was corrupt, weak, and abused its powers. Thoreau had strong feelings toward the abolition of slavery, and he also felt that the Mexican War was an unjust conflict. He believed that individuals should stand up and take action against the group that promotes their own selfish interests at the expense of morality, ethics, and individual rights; otherwise known as the government.…
- 1246 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
`In "Civil Disobedience," Thoreau begins an attack on the philosophy of a strong ruling government by saying, "I heartily accept the motto 'That government is best which governs least;' and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically." (Thoreau 1614) Thoreau further states that he holds the belief that man will be able to have a government that does not govern at all. He believes that the need for government really arises from the requirement of people to have a sort of "machine" to control things and make their decisions for them. Thoreau explains that the only time government has helped is when it has stood aside. In fact government does not: keep the country free, settle the west, or educate; rather such achievements come from the character of the people. The message I received from reading Thoreau is to avoid associating with government all together, that people should live by their conscience not the laws of an unjust government. When people do this they can explore new ideas and be creative. Thoreau is trying to challenge the average person to live up to their potential, which…
- 786 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Thoreau also uses imagery in order for his argument to make sense to the reader. He states, "...they would deserve to be classed and punished with those mischievous persons who put…
- 167 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In his essay, Civil Disobedience, Henry David Thoreau introduced his audience to his personal thoughts regarding the injustice of the American government. Moreover, he sought to encourage individual action to boycott any law or institution instilled by the government that was in any way conflicting with a person’s beliefs. A true revolutionary at heart, Thoreau put his words into action by refusing to pay his poll tax for 6 years and was forced to spend the night in jail because of it. Rather than seeking reform by cooperating with the corrupt institutions of his time, he refused to become a part of them and condemned their existence.…
- 615 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man?” By this, we all know Thoreau is accentuating his own needs, rather than those of the majority, because as he has already stated, “A majority are permitted.” Instead of distinguishing the fact that the “majority” of people are satisfied with the government formation, he insists on irritating them and trying to change their motives, in reproofing the fulfilled ambitions they have accomplished, and hopes for tomorrow. His unawareness in this and other perspectives are clearly visible.…
- 1684 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
similar to Remarques book thinks that going to war for your country is an act of honour. Telling…
- 734 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for, in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure.” (Thoreau 385)…
- 831 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Yet ask those same people whether they would be willing in cold blood to start another civil war now to gain another similar possession, and not one man or woman would vote for the proposition. In modern eyes, precious though wars may be, they must not be waged solely for the sake of the ideal harvest (95).…
- 1134 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays