Preview

Comparison of Federalist Party to the Whig Party.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison of Federalist Party to the Whig Party.
AP US History

Evolution: Federalists to Whigs

America's early history is marked with drastic changes in political situations and public opinions, leading to the inception and termination of various political parties. These parties came and went, but at any single moment in time, America's government was controlled by one party, with a second vying for power. One such party was born out of the controversy over the adoption of the proposed Federal Constitution - the Federalist Party. It dominated congress and, therefore, America for approximately twenty-five years until it disintegrated and its members scattered throughout various other factions. Fourteen years after the Federalists' dissolution the Whig party rose as another prominent political group. The Whig party, although historically considered absolutely independent of any other previous American parties, was a partial continuation of the Federalist Party.

The Federalist Party's initial prevalence in American politics was first noted during the adoption of the Federal Constitution in 1787 to 1788. It yearned for a nation in which the states had far less authority than the federal government. However, the party's opponents (the future leaders of the Democratic-Republicans) wished for a greater power to be granted to America's states. These clashing opinions were soothed by the Bill of Rights, a compromise that checks and limits the federal government's power.

Nevertheless, a well-defined Federalist Party did not exist before 1794. After George Washington's inauguration in 1789, Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton proposed a plan that would force the national government to assume state debts, fund the national debt, and charter a national bank. Followers of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison opposed this idea, stating that it gave too great a power to the national bank and government. Furthermore, the Hamiltonians' refusal to form an alliance with France fused the Democratic and Republican parties,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two-party system was formed by the end of Jackson’s presidency. [1] Although both parties, Jacksonian Democrats and Whigs, grew out of the same roots of the Jeffersonian republicanism, each bore different political philosophy and policy. For example, the Whigs welcomed the involvement of government and favored protective tariffs. They believed in internal improvements, schools and black colonization with the federal finance. They also advocated the regulation of currency and credit based on the similar idea of the Bank of the United States. Furthermore, the party supported moral, intellectual, economic advance, and the state school systems as well as a soft approach to the Indian removal. The Whigs emphasized principles of system and disciplines…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the Whig party fell, the Republican party was erected and focused on the political…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In general, the Federalists were those who supported a stronger centralized government. The Federalist movement was motivated by the idea that the national government under the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that a new, stronger form of government must replace it. The founder of this party was Alexander Hamilton, George Washington's Secretary of the Treasury during his first term as President. Hamilton's network of supporters grew into what would become the Federalist Party. Hamiltonian Federalists wanted a fiscally sound and nationalistic government that would intervene in the economy. Hamilton's proposal toward this…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When the Federalist party was organized in 1791, those people who favored a strong central government and a loose constitutional interpretation coagulated and followed the ideals of men such as Alexander Hamilton. The first opposition political party in the United States was the Republican party, which held power, nationally, between 1801 and 1825. Those who were in favor of states rights and a strict construction of the constitution fell under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson. These Jeffersonian republicans, also known as anti-federalists, believed in strict adherence to the writings of the constitution. They wanted state's rights and individual rights, which they believed could only be granted under strict construction of the constitution. Thomas Jefferson, the third president, and James Madison, his successor, were close friends and lifelong political associates. Long regarded as advocates for liberty, Jefferson and Madison believed in the principles of government and sought to restore the spirit of the revolution of 1776. These republicans spoke out against anti-monarchial attitudes and opposed the aristocratic and elitist attitudes of the federalists (Peterson, 1975). A weaker central government by the people was the goal of the republican party. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, were two presidents who believed in the theory of the republican party, but due to circumstances within the parties and the increasing conflicts between Britain and France abroad, they found it increasingly difficult to act in a manner which coincided with their republican beliefs and at times had to reconcile their actions.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    American populace was partitioned to two groups. One group comprises of the federalists who were living in the north. Their advantage was in favor of the merchants, ship-owners, and the industrialist. They are currently known as the Democrat party. The North was experiencing a modern upset and Democratic Party was supportive of this change. The Second group comprises of the anti-federalists, who were living in the south and were in light of a legitimate concern for state and farmers right. They are presently known as the republican. History of the Americans demonstrates that the two political vested parties had/have their own particular thoughts. Those thoughts were planted to the most youthful era by the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the late 1700s, after the American Revolution, George Washington became the first President of the United States. In 1789 when Washington assumed the presidency, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson both served as cabinet members. Hamilton served as Secretary of the Treasury and Jefferson the Secretary of State. Alexander Hamilton is well known as the founder of the Federalists, a group of people who favored adopting the Constitution as the backbone of this nation. That view was opposed by Jefferson, founder of the Democrat-Republican Party, and by virtue anti-federalists.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the election of 1796 two parties emerged. The Federalist who were formed by Hamilton and his associates to promote shared political ideas who believed in a strong centralized government and felt the Constitution was open for interpretation. The Democratic Republican party who Thomas Jefferson and James Madison lead and believed in state rights, strict interpretation of the Constitution, and limited government. After looking at both sides I believe Hamilton and the Federalist is the best side. The Federalist seem to want all the states to pitch in together with things such as debt, creating a national bank, etc.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Washington and Alexander Hamilton the secretary of treasury, and one of the federalist paper writers, knew that the economy could not prosper in the present chaotic atmosphere. Congress told Hamilton to write a report on the economy of the states. Hamilton analyzed in his report, the financial standing of the United States of America, and made a recommendation for the retirement of the national debt. During the American Revolution, the country under the article of confederation acquired a very large debt. America borrowed a lot of money from other European countries, mostly the French and the dutch. Hamilton’s financial plan in 1791, organized the debt in three categories, debt owed to foreign nations, debt owed by the national government to private citizens and debt owed by states to private citizens. Some states were also in debt. Hamilton calls for assumption which means that he wants to assume all the state debt into the national debt. This financial plan made the southerners angry, especially who believed in states rights. Hamilton comes to a compromise with Thomas Jefferson, the secretary of state, in order to get assumption which is what Hamilton’s wants,but Jefferson wants something for the south. The assumption is very controversial because the southern states are starting to become a state right and they are afraid that if you allow the federal government…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist Party came to an end after Daniel Webster’s last speech at the Hartford Convention. Soon thereafter, Andrew Jackson became president and as a result of some of his choices, many people in the South began to dislike him. These Jackson-haters joined together to create the Whig Party, formed to go against Jackson’s Democratic Party. Much like the Federalists, the Whigs supported a high protective tariff throughout the U.S. in order to raise more money for the government. The Federalists viewed Clay’s American System as a good structure and later, this system became the basis of the Whig Party. Also like the Federalists, the Whigs believed in a strong central government, supported the BUS, and were willing to compromise on the issue of slavery. Ultimately, the Whig party was just another name for the previous…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the Federalists and Democratic differences were that they both had a different leader Federalists had Alexander Hamilton and Democratic Republicans leader was Thomas Jefferson. Federalists, lost interception of the constitution and they, and also the federal constitution. The Federalist was in charge to protect the Tarrifs. Federalist thought that it should be educated men who should own their own property and would also protect everyone's rights. The Democratic Republicans differences were that the they wanted the limit the government power.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton believed that since The United States was growing as a new nation, they could take advantage of it and use it as a source of energy and cohesion. Furthermore, his main goal was just to spark up the economy and revive it to the point where it was normally flowing. So, his first idea was to completely eradicate all national and stately debt. He wanted to look at the accumulated debt of the Revolutionary War at face value and completely do away with it. Also, he wanted to create a budget for the country with allowed them just enough money to get by and not create any more debt. A federal tax system was also thought of to help bring the nation into financial clearance. The nation would…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The statement “Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups, and proposed similar programs and policies” is partially true. Both the Federalists and the Whigs shared common political ideas of the same interests groups, and proposed similar programs and policies- such as Clay’s American system and Hamilton’s economic plan. Both parties also believed in the National Bank because they thought it was necessary and proper. But, both parties had many differences as well. These differences consisted of representation, leadership and origination.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two major political parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, seemed unable to deal with the differences between North and South. By the 1850s, however, most Americans considered those sectional divisions too fundamental to ignore. The Republican Party, conceived out of the great political crisis and the disagreement over the fate of slavery was the prime force behind this crisis, but European immigration, westward expansion, industrialization, and political corruption troubled Americans as well. A handful of Republicans fought against slavery because they believed it was wrong, and hoped for equality for blacks. Most, however, thought that African-Americans were inferior but did recognize their basic humanity and required fundamental human…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans provided the U.S. with permanent political parties due to their interpretation of the Constitution, which would evolve and merge the beliefs of the two as time went on. When the political parties were created, people they might believed weaken the unity of the U.S., but they checked and balanced each other out to make sure there would be no tyrannical party ruler. As the Federalists interpreted the Constitution loosely, mainly using the elastic clause, they were able to create and pass laws that were not directly stated in the Constitution, which the Democratic-Republicans would then argue as invalid. During the period from 1800 to 1824, both the Federalists and Democratic-Republicans stayed true to their traditional principles; however, both parties evolved and compromised their ideals during the endless conflict of the strengthening of the governments powers and adaptation to the never-ending disagreements political parties, according to what was needed at the time.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays