Comparison of Apple and Black Berry
Acknowledgement:-
This project is one of the most important piece of work for my whole educational carrier, while doing this Project I have been gone through various Phases, I was having a mix feelings of depression, motivation, Hope, fear, and the hope for better future. Writing of this thesis could never have been possible without the continuous support and the motivation of my parents and siblings. By taking this opportunity I would like to thank my tutors who always guided me in the right direction and because of them I have finished this thesis.
At the end, I just want to thank all of my friends who always motivated me whenever I was depressed and felt low, just because of them I could have gather enough courage and the will power to finish this longest ever thesis of my life
Abstract:-
Competitiveness at the global level is one of the most interesting and important topic in today’s business world, competitiveness is the key to overcome global economic recession and to prove this statement, competitive strategies of apple and black berry have been analyzed. With the critical analysis of the competitive analysis of both apple and black berry it has become evident that both the companies are at the path of continues growth trajectory, and with their innovation and creativity these two companies are still performing outstandingly well. Global economic recession has a strong connection with the competitiveness among international firms, like with the intense competition companies always tried to innovate and keen to introduce new and advanced products in the market, which brings the business in the market. As the sales of these organizations increases, it brings money circulation within the market which somehow plays crucial role in reducing global economic recession period. It have been noted that both of these apple and black berry have been involved in continues R&D technique , in this way they will be more capable to capture the whole market and
This project is one of the most important piece of work for my whole educational carrier, while doing this Project I have been gone through various Phases, I was having a mix feelings of depression, motivation, Hope, fear, and the hope for better future. Writing of this thesis could never have been possible without the continuous support and the motivation of my parents and siblings. By taking this opportunity I would like to thank my tutors who always guided me in the right direction and because of them I have finished this thesis.
At the end, I just want to thank all of my friends who always motivated me whenever I was depressed and felt low, just because of them I could have gather enough courage and the will power to finish this longest ever thesis of my life
Abstract:-
Competitiveness at the global level is one of the most interesting and important topic in today’s business world, competitiveness is the key to overcome global economic recession and to prove this statement, competitive strategies of apple and black berry have been analyzed. With the critical analysis of the competitive analysis of both apple and black berry it has become evident that both the companies are at the path of continues growth trajectory, and with their innovation and creativity these two companies are still performing outstandingly well. Global economic recession has a strong connection with the competitiveness among international firms, like with the intense competition companies always tried to innovate and keen to introduce new and advanced products in the market, which brings the business in the market. As the sales of these organizations increases, it brings money circulation within the market which somehow plays crucial role in reducing global economic recession period. It have been noted that both of these apple and black berry have been involved in continues R&D technique , in this way they will be more capable to capture the whole market and
References: Anderson, C.R., and F.T. Paine. 1975. “Managerial Perceptions and Strategic Behaviour.” Academy of Management Journal 18 (4): 811–823. Aldrich, H.E. 1979. Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Ansoff, H.I. 1965. Corporate Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill. Bell M, Pavitt K (1993). Accumulating technological capability in developing countries. in Summers LH, Shah S (Eds): Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992. World Bank: Washington DC: 257-81. Boulton, W.R., W.M. Lindsay, S.G. Franklin, and L.W. Rue. 1982. “Strategic Planning: Determining the Impact of Environmental Characteristics and Uncertainty.” Academy of Management Journal 25 (3): 500–509. Bourgeois, L.J., and K. Eisenhardt. 1988. “Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry.” Management Bourgeois ——. 1984. “Strategic Management and Determinism.” Academy of Management Review 9 (4): 586–596. Burrell, G., and G. Morgan. 1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis Begg I (1999). Cities and Competitiveness. Urban Stud., 36(5/6): 795- 809. Brown,William (1999) ‘Collective bargaining and employment in Britain in the 1990s’, ILO-Geneva Burns, T., and G Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989). Innovation and learning: The two faces of R and D. Econ. J., 99(397): 569-596 Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press. Campbell T (2009). Learning cities: Knowledge, capacity and competitiveness. Habitat Int., 33(2): 195-201. Cooke P (2004). The role of research in regional innovation systems: new models meeting knowledge economy demands. Int. J. Tech. Manage. 28 (3/4/5/6): 507-533. Coda, V. 1984. “La valutazione della formula imprenditoriale.” Sviluppo & Organizzazione 82 (March–April): 7–22. Daft, R.L., J. Sormunen, and D. Parks. 1988. “Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study.” Strategic Management Journal 9 (2): 123–139. Duncan, R.B. 1972. “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (3): 313–327. Duncan, R.B. 1972. “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (3): 313–327. ———. 1973. “Multiple Decision-Making Structures in Adapting to Environmental Uncertainty: The Impact on Organizational Effectiveness.” Human Relations Dean, J.W., Jr., and M.P. Sharfman. 1993. “Procedural Rationality in the Strategic Decision-Making Process.” Journal of Management Studies 30 (4): 587–611. Fagerberg J, Verspagen B (2002). Technology-gaps, innovationdiffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation Felker GB (2003). Southeast Asian industrialisation and the changing global production system. Third World Q., 24(2): 255-282. Fredrickson, J.W., and A.L. Iaquinto. 1989. “Inertia and Creeping Rationality in Strategic Decision Processes.” Academy of Management Journal 32 (4): 516–542. Fredrickson, J.W. 1984. “The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future Directions.” Academy of Management Journal 27 (3): 445–466. Green, D., King, R. and Miller-Dawkins, M. (2010) The global economic crisis and developing countries, Oxfam Research Paper, Oxford: Galbraith, J. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley. Hossain, N., Fillaili, R., Lubaale, G., Mulumbi, M. and Rashid, M. (2010) Social impacts of crisis: findings from community-level research in five developing countries, Hult, G.T.M.; R.F. Hurley; L.C. Giunipero; and E.L. Nichols, Jr. 2000. “Organizational Learning in Global Purchasing: A Model and Test of Internal Users and Hickson, D.J., R.J. Butler, D. Cray, G.R. Mallory, and D.C. Wilson. 1986. Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Hamel, G., and C.K. Prahalad. 1993. “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage.” Harvard Business Review 71 (2): 75–85. Ivarsson I (2002). Transnational corporations and the geographical transfer of localised technology: a multi-industry study of foreign affiliates in Sweden. J. Econ. Geol., 2(2): 221-247. IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2010a) World economic outlook update, January 26, 2010, Washington, DC: IMF. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. Kauppinen, T. (1999) The Impact of EMU on Industrial Relations in European Union, Finnish Labour Relations Association, Publication N°9, Helsinki.