In response to the American historical context of the 1930s, To Kill A Mockingbird demonstrates the irrationality of societal attitudes society’s through a modal voice and enlightens the responders’ viewpoint. In Atticus’s culminating statement at the trial, characterization and moral voice is displayed to enforce the power and worth of the viewpoint presented. In his direct speech, “the evil assumption – that all Negroes lie, that all Negroes are basically immoral beings, that all Negro men are not to be trusted around our women…” Atticus delivers the prevalent assumption against disenfranchised individuals of the 1930s. Here, repetition, substantiated by italics, emphasizes his forceful tone in regards to the word ‘all’. By providing a high modal voice, Lee challenges responders to realize that ‘all’ used in this situation is fallacious. While disenfranchised individuals in both texts suffer prejudice, in To Kill A Mockingbird the accused is convicted although
In response to the American historical context of the 1930s, To Kill A Mockingbird demonstrates the irrationality of societal attitudes society’s through a modal voice and enlightens the responders’ viewpoint. In Atticus’s culminating statement at the trial, characterization and moral voice is displayed to enforce the power and worth of the viewpoint presented. In his direct speech, “the evil assumption – that all Negroes lie, that all Negroes are basically immoral beings, that all Negro men are not to be trusted around our women…” Atticus delivers the prevalent assumption against disenfranchised individuals of the 1930s. Here, repetition, substantiated by italics, emphasizes his forceful tone in regards to the word ‘all’. By providing a high modal voice, Lee challenges responders to realize that ‘all’ used in this situation is fallacious. While disenfranchised individuals in both texts suffer prejudice, in To Kill A Mockingbird the accused is convicted although