Preview

Confederate Statues Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
455 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Confederate Statues Research Paper
There has been a lot of fighting in the united states over the keeping or removal of confederate statues, with all the discussion that have of occurred over events such as Charlottesville. After doing research on the topic and forming my own opinion of the matter, for the following reasons I will explain why I am for the removal of confederate statues.
Confederate statues production was not during or at the end of the civil war but years after during times of segregation, People such as San Antonio Councilman Robert Trevino claim that "This is not an important art piece, but a monument to power, it was put in to remind people of that power. It is an unfortunate message of hate, and we think it's important to relocate it." This shows that
…show more content…
Boston university professor who is knowledgeable about the civil war says "The idea that this somehow is about Southern Heritage, I think that ship has sailed." This shows that the idea that this gives any form of learning or culture is not true, and that it may even send a bad message. Some may argue that the statues do give culture and that's why the people in Charlottesville went to the rally, however this argument is flawed as most of the people at the rally where not from Charlottesville in the first place but actually from around united states, these factors show that it was not about the statues but about the message the racist were spreading, and as a symbol for neo-Nazi's.
Overall the removal of confederate statues would cause no loss, if not beneficial. Not only because when the statues were built they were made as a message of hate and segregation but also the fact that the statues are now being used as a symbol for people like Neo-Nazis. The statues should no longer be on the streets to be honored, they should be removed from the public's view and instead be added to places like civil war museums to give proper context on what the statues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cherry and Edmonds, do not like the idea of the monument, but they agree that now is not the time to make a decision on the issue. They want to wait for the courts to come back with a decision and feel that they are wasting time bringing this issue up on a regular…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reaction: I understand why people would want the statues of Columbus taken down, seeing how Columbus is no longer viewed…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Regan Montgomery Thaddeus Stevens Reflection. Thaddeus Stevens was not in favor of an easy re-entry into the Union for former Confederate states. He was in favor of punitive action against the South because he believed it was necessary to ensure justice and protect the rights of freed slaves. Stevens also thought that without consequences, the former Confederate states might revert to their old ways and continue to oppress the newly freed African Americans. Without violence involving punishment principles, two positions have been suggested: the Southern states should be treated as they never left because the Constitution doesn’t allow secession, and the Southern states, by seceding from the Union, had positioned themselves as enemies of the…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that the monument should stay in its rightful place. Since it’s been located there for more than 80 years it was built there in 1925. I feel that the people that do not like the monument should not drive by it, or go visit it. These complaints started in 2010 in Prince George’s county in the state of Maryland.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The portrayal of Christopher Columbus as a statue caused an uproar of left wing citizens because of the negative factors Columbus brought into America regarding slavery and his greediness to find success within his journey. However, this doesn't give the right for these citizens to destroy his statue just because it offends them, which is technically taking away the freedom of speech. On the other hand, this Christopher Columbus holiday is another reason these liberals are furious because of the idea of celebrating an event that is looked upon as a negative one. Essentially this is a part of history and the citizens have no possibility to change it, but only learn from the mistakes to shape the present day into a better…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, the lower South should be able to secede peacefully. As a Southern Democrat, I believe that it is not only the right of the lower South states to secede, but secession is needed now. This secession is very important to the development of the lower South. The Constitution gives states’ rights, and just because the lower South is not in 100% agreement with the Northern states, that does not mean that our rights can be taken away (page 336 in our book). Now, let’s fast forward to President Taylor’s plan to allow California and New Mexico to choose if they want to be a slave state or a free state (page 635 of our assigned readings).…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Finally. It's time everyone in the United States understand the larger implications of when we have a significant American population celebrate a racist symbol and history. By waving the Confederate Flag proudly, by allowing Confederate history to be cemented through statues and buildings, essentially we are all implicating what the Confederacy did and the principles they stood for, were…

    • 60 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Canadian Figures

    • 6186 Words
    • 25 Pages

    The statue of Private Watson does not belong at city hall because it no longer represents its original intent. The statue has become meaningless over time. Its meaning was only relative for the first thirty years that it stood there. During that time it stood as a memorial for fallen soldiers, which was not the original intention as stated in the Johnston and Ripmeester article, “Moreover, for about 30 years the memorial served as a focus for efforts to remember fallen soldiers. Time, however, has not been kind to the monument.” This is very true as many people do not know what the statue actually stands for or the history behind the statue of Private Watson. In the article by Johnston and Ripmeester, their survey result proves this in saying, “Only 6% of those surveyed were able to identify the monument’s purpose.” The survey was taken of residents who live near the statue and yet they did not even know what it stood for. Clearly, the meaning of the monument has been lost, rendering it pointless. Therefore, removal of it is crucial.…

    • 6186 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    states his many interpretations of the actual meaning of the First Amendment. Universities all over the Untied States are finding it difficult to clarify the controversy over free speech. Bok 's purpose in writing the essay is to bring out the differences between free speech and offensive material such as the display of Confederate flags and Swastikas, which was the situation at Harvard University. This made students in the community uneasy and offended. Those who exposed the symbols argued that if they were forced to remove certain symbols, it was against their right to free speech and expression. 
Bok explains that many other colleges and universities have had to deal with accusations such as these. Many groups have responded negatively in enforcing restrictions was wrong and against the First Amendment. The fact of the matter is that the students that are uncomfortable with displaying such images as a Confederate flag or a swastika, clearly out numbers the amount of students that find pride in such a thing. The students must have known that retaliating by exposing the swastika would result in upsetting others at the university. Bok explains that the U.S has been struggling with complications to the free speech rights. It’s an issue of whether to honor the freedom of speech completely or only to focus on developing a nation built on mutual respect.Works Cited…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Lost Cause” advocates stated that their work was not political, there is truth in this statement as there work was primarily social. The primary purpose of the “Lost Cause” was to maintain the preexisting and an idealistic social life of the south. The United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) were an example of a group that advocated for the “Lost Cause”. In “The United Daughters of the Confederacy Constitution, 1894” it is stated that one of their main duties was “to collect and preserve material for a truthful history of the war” and to honor those who fought in the war. Additionally, many monuments were made to honor the soldiers, such as the one pictured in the “Commemorative postcard of living Confederate flag, Robert E. Lee Monument, Richmond, Virginia, 1907”. Furthermore, reunion gatherings…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederate Symbols

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Unfortunately, this answer raises serious questions concerning legality issues, as government intervention appears the only option. Under the editorial’s reasonings, both private and public Confederate symbols would be removed from the public. Plus, it is unfair to those suffering from the racist behaviors of Confederate flag supporters to only remove the artifacts from the public, but allow those same artifacts to be owned by the very people who discriminate them. Indisputably, however, human beings are both prideful and stubborn, and the entire population of America will not allow symbols of the Confederacy to be simply removed from their own private property. Government action –laws announcing that it is prohibited to own or display these…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reaction that the sculpture received was unexpected. He did not anticipate controversy that would soon come. He believed the outcome would be quite the opposite, and that the public would be in total awe. When the Tiled Arc was completed, people were surprisingly irate. WNYC.com stated, "Two months after its installation, a petition requesting the removal of the sculpture was signed by 1,300 federal employees working in and around the plaza". The workers thought of the piece as rubbish, and that it was hazardous and could attract terrorists. In my opinion, I believe their view is ludicrous. What would be the difference if it were an enormous eagle made out of steel or something of that nature? They would have not blinked an eye. The dilemma here is that these people do not grasp the concepts of art. Their interests lie in politics, law enforcement, etcetera. According to Serra, " This is the point, "The viewer becomes aware of himself and of his movement through the plaza. As he moves, the sculpture changes. Contraction and expansion of the sculpture result from the viewer's movement. Step by step the perception not only of the sculpture but of the entire environment changes". Unfortunately, the viewers did not visualize it in that aspect. I think this situation is ironic, because American's always preach about free will and free speech but yet when others put out something into society they reject it…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Last Conquistador

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the movie The Last Conquistador, there is a controversy going on between John Houser, a sculpture who successfully attempted to create and mount the tallest bronze equestrian statue in the world, and people who funded the building of the statue and Native Americans living in Texas. The Native Americans don’t want the statue of a long-forgotten Spanish conquistador Juan de Oñate, branded a terrorist and a genocidal architect by some, to be built. The Native Americans think that Juan de Oñate is anything to celebrate. He killed thousands of the Native Americans’ ancestors and took their lands. While the Native Americans have their points, Houser and his helpers are trying to help out the city of El Paso, Texas. El Paso Texas is one of the poorest cities in the United States. With Houser Building this statue, Revenue from tourists would help the city out. I honestly think that in this situation, everyone needs to understand where everyone else is coming from. The statue was not meant to be demeaning to the Native Americans in anyway and it is a beautiful piece of art that is very well sculpted. But then again, Houser should have done his research and understood how bad of a man Oñate was and realized that putting that statue up where eighty percent of the people living there are of Native American decent wasn’t a good idea. Even though the Oñate statue is beautiful, I believe it should have never gone up in the first place.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Confederate monuments are a vital part of history and eliminating them is like eliminating history. The past is the past and the monuments do not stand for racism it stands for a part of history and it definitely wasn't a good part of history but it was a learning experience for it to not happen again. The statues and flag stands for history of the south and every time someone see a flag or monument it reminds them of what the ancestors of the south did and fought for in the civil war. If that is taken away eventually the whole memory all together will be forgotten. They stand for the south and the way of life , the struggle they went through in order to obtain states rights, and the past events and without them the nation wouldn’t be where it is now.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Crow Museum

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Jim crow museum depicts very accurately how racist southern america used to be. It is astonishing how much hatred people can have for something as messily as the color of someone's skin. Jim Crow was developed as a fictitious character that…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays