Preview

Confrontation Clause Essay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1191 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Confrontation Clause Essay
In the United States criminal justice system, the defendant is innocent until proven guilty.

There are three ways that actually help the defendant from being wrongly accused and gives

them a fighting chance to win in case they are innocent; the confrontation clause, cross-

examination and the burden of proof. The confrontation clause is an important part of the 6th

amendment which gives the defendant the right to confront their accuser. Cross examination

helps to find out more about the witness and the incident and the burden of proof falls upon the

prosecutor to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offense. All three

of these have importance because they help lead to the conviction of the offender.
…show more content…
They can be the reason the defendant wins or loses. When the person who called

the witness questions the witness they are directly examining them When the other party

questions the witness, that is called cross examination. Both the defense lawyer and prosecutor

try to discredit the person who is being cross-examined. When the prosecutor questions the

defendant their initial goal is to get something out of the defendant. They try to get the
…show more content…
Different states

have different procedures regarding the confrontation clause even though it violates their state

constitutions

The burden of proof falls upon the prosecutor. They have to prove beyond a reasonable

doubt that the defendant is in fact guilty. There is only one case where the burden of proof falls

on the defense. The burden of proof falls on the defense when trying to prove that the defendant

is mentally ill therefore, not fully responsible for their actions. In these cases, if the defense

proves that the defendant is in fact mentally ill then the defendant is sent to a mental institution

instead of prison. Until that moment that the prosecutor proves that the defendant is guilty, the

defendant is presumed innocent. The reason as to why the burden of proof is extremely important

to the criminal justice system is because it is there to protect people from being wrongly

convicted. The defendant can’t be convicted unless the majority of the jury gives the verdict that

he or she is guilty. However, there have been countless cases where innocent people have spent

decades in prison for a crime that they didn’t commit. While the burden of proof doesn’t

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "It must be a jury determination that [he] is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt." (515 S Ct. 506 (1995)…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapters 5-9 Study guide

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages

    7. Prosecutors have discretion in charging decisions. What is the general burden of proof that a prosecutor…

    • 2328 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    This process is where witnesses are called to give their statements. They are questioned and cross examined by all lawyers/attorneys. Cross examination is being questioned by each lawyer/attorney they may ask the same questions but in different words. The prosecutor is there to make the jury believe the criminal is guilty whereas the defense attorney is there to make the jury question if the criminal is really guilty. There are also three types of witnesses which are; ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses. “Ordinary witnesses can testify only as to their personal observations. Expert witnesses, on the other hand, are allowed to offer their opinions in their area of expertise. Chartacter witnesses may testify only to the general good reputation of the defendant” (Zalman,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years now, there has been an enormous increase in the accusations of innocent defendants of wrongful convictions. Research has shown a number of common factors that appear frequently in wrongful conviction cases, including forensic error, prosecutorial misconduct, false confessions, and eyewitness…

    • 44 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Ramona French 2011. The court has to prove that the defendant has committed the murder, that the killing was premeditated and done intentionally, or that it was done with complete disregard for human life. If the court of law has enough evidence to…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosecuting Arguments

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The prosecution must establish the facts and elements of each crime to prove a defendant's guilt. The elements of crime are the basic components of the crime, and the essential features of that crime specified by law or statute. These elements include actus reus, mens rea, and a concurrence of the two. To convict the defendant of a particular crime, the prosecution must establish that each of the required elements are present in the facts to prove criminal liability (Schmalleger, Hall, & Dolatowski, 2010). In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the prosecution must establish the facts and elements of the charges for homicide, assault of a police officer, kidnapping, burglary, and crimes related to drugs.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Convictions

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    way. Honest attorneys present all evidence and information that has been gathered for the case.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    When a defendant is pursuing a self-defense defense there are five elements or principles that must be proven. The burden of the proof is on the defense. The proof and/or evidence is required to be beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury before a self-defense action is labeled as legal self-defense. If the defense cannot prove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, the prosecution is not required to disprove the…

    • 3363 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In criminal cases, the burden of proof rests entirely with the prosecution. The defence is not required to prove innocence as there exists a presumption of innocence.…

    • 2649 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Actus Reus - Paper

    • 3016 Words
    • 13 Pages

    It is the fundamental duty of the prosecution to prove both of these elements of the offence to the satisfaction of the judge or jury beyond reasonable doubt. In the absence of such proof the defendant will be acquitted.…

    • 3016 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The burden of proof is greater in criminal proceedings and the SFC will generally only recommend criminal proceedings where there is admissible, substantial and reliable evidence that an offence has been committed and there is a reasonable prospect of a conviction. Where there is a lack of sufficient evidence to meet the criminal burden of proof, the SFC is likely to initiate civil proceedings.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due Process

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though this process cannot prove innocence or guilt it is a better way to gather…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Presumption Of Innocence 3

    • 3586 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The collapse of Western Modern Empire gave way to the rise of feudalistic justice system. Within it, there was no concept of presumption of innocence. Rather, it was the duty of the accused to prove his innocence, either by means of taking an oath of innocence or through undergoing life-threatening ordeals. It could thus be reasonably inferred that the defendants were required to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt.…

    • 3586 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays